Time: Sun Nov 24 18:37:42 1996 To: liberty@hollyent.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Nora Manella Cc: Bcc: >Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 18:28:25 >To: Dr.No@mbhbbs.playcom.com (Dr No) >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: Nora Manella >Bcc: Liberty Law > >Some of the Libertarians I have met >over the years remind me of sailors >who, upon seeing their first ice berg, >remark how amazing it is to be seeing >floating ice, never bothering to ask >how much of the ice berg is actually >under the water, out of sight, and >out of reach. > >Lots of warrants issued by Elizabeth Broderick >entrained lots of marginal real estates >in southern California; many of those >people were poor Hispanics, Vietnamese, >and other ethnic minorities. I addressed >two of their weekend seminars, and many >of them could barely speak English, much >less understand lectures on constitutional >law, commercial banking, and current affairs. > >At the back table where I sat, prior to >speaking on one occasion, nobody was speaking >English, and when I tried to speak to them, >they gestured to me that they did not understand >my language. These people were very vulnerable >targets for a property conversion racket >orchestrated by agents within the Department >of Justice, most probably in Los Angeles. > >My very rough estimate is that approximately >5,000 people were entrained in this racket, >via entrapment. Broderick had recorded her >Orange County lien in the "U S CRIMINAL COURT", >which simply does not exist. See Title 28 >of the United States Code for proof positive. > >Do you now see what I mean here? > >Or do I need to elaborate more of the ugly >details? > >By sending Broderick to "study" under LeRoy >Michael Schweitzer in Montana, the racket >had, as one of its main purposes, a goal of >impugning Schweitzer's lien practices, which >were a great deal better than what the >Federal Reserve has been doing against the >American People ever since 1913. At least >Schweitzer's liens were based on unrebutted >affidavits. The Federal Reserve is using >commercial lien practices which are fraudulent, >stem to stern. > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail