Time: Tue Nov 26 07:39:33 1996
To: Jonathan Craft <jcraft@hitel.com>,dminer1380@aol.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: The Kick-Back Racket
Cc:
Bcc:
At 08:27 AM 11/26/96 EST, you wrote:
>Salutations.
>
>Could you e-mail me a copy of "The Kick Back Racket?" I
>lost my e-copy.
merged at end of this message
>
>An accountant I know is in prison. She was convicted
>of some ludicrously bogus "embezzelment" charge. I
>was told the prosecutor received $25,000 (tax free)
>for her conviction and another $5000 for putting it
>in the paper. I know she doesn't file 1040.
Mark L. Zolton in IRS admitted,
in writing, that PMRS awards
were paid in cash (no records).
See his letter merged below.
>
>I know of a few other people who would be interested
>in the "Kick Back...".
see "Supreme Law Library" at URL
http://www.supremelaw.com
Could you also mail a copy
>to "dminer1380@aol.com".
consider it done.
David Miner is a friend
>of mine. He has written a book "Tax Answers
>the IRS doesn't want you to have" which is probably
>on of the best "introductory" books to the income
>tax fraud.
How much does he sell it for?
>
>Any word from the IRS re: statutes imposing a liability
>on individual/entites under FOIA?
Yes, the letter is waiting in
my inbox to be processed. They
mentioned the 16th Amendment.
>
>Jonathan Craft
>jcraft@hitel.com
[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
For Immediate Release November 4, 1996
The Kick-Back Racket:
Performance Management and
Recognition System
by
Paul Andrew Mitchell
All Rights Reserved
(October 1996)
It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of
a conspiracy of silence which has descended upon the District of
Columbia in recent months, that President Clinton has a lot of
explaining to do, in quite a few executive departments. One of
the best suppressed stories of his administration thus far is
evidence of White House kick-backs from the Internal Revenue
Service ("IRS") for each and every indictment issued by federal
grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are.
The term itself is an oxymoron, because protest has never
been illegal in America. Protest is even recognized by the
federal government's precious Uniform Commercial Code for
repudiating presentments in a lawful manner. So, for the phrase
"illegal tax protestor" to withstand the obvious constitutional
challenge (yes, the First Amendment is still the supreme Law in
America), the adjective "illegal" must modify the noun "tax."
This is a telling admission on the part of our vaulted Congress
of what many Americans have known for a long time, namely, the
federal income tax is a total and utter fraud, from stem to
stern. Our Ship of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with
loop-holes and sinking fast.
What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which
the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak
the truth. A key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM")
clearly shows that the President routinely receives $35,000 from
the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). We
have a political prisoner in federal custody right now who is
prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and
every time a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any
illegal tax protestor ("ITP"). U.S. Attorneys receive a mere
$25,000 per indictment of ITP's.
Now, if the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task
force in place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the
former Pilot Connection Society which has been reported to have
over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if
his hench-persons in the DOJ succeed in bringing grand jury
indictments against all 5,000. Let's see, 5,000 times $35,000
equals $175,000,000. The bad news for President Clinton is that
the IRM provides absolutely no authority for these "performance
recognition rewards" (read "kick-backs"). Courts have
consistently ruled that the IRM has no more authority than a
pizza recipe, when it comes to authorizing salaries and other
The Kick-Back Racket: Page 1 of 3
compensation for federal government employees. Federal employee
salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a
far cry from that high standard of law.
Furthermore, the Constitution forbids the President from
receiving any other "emoluments" during his term of office. See
Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within
that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of
them." A FOIA request by this author for all PMRS records
produced an admission, on Treasury Department letterhead, that
some records do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash.
This is bad enough. But, when you couple these kick-backs with
the perjury racket now rampant within the Department of Just US,
and with a grand jury system which badly needs either complete
overhaul or abolition, you quickly find that the indictments
issuing from federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the
Internal Revenue Code, are really threats, engineered by the
biggest extortion racket this planet has ever seen. Jury
tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do
a far better job of describing what is really going on.
In one recent grand jury case, involving a subpoena for
certain books and records, a federal judge in Arizona conspired
with the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of
mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction
of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the
above. When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to
investigate probable violations of federal law by the AUSA, the
judge intercepted this certified request, and all subsequent
pleadings which were then directed to the grand jury by Counsel
in order to keep them informed of what was really going on.
These pleadings contained crucial evidence -- you guessed it --
of the PMRS kick-back racket, and of a pattern of pathological
lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for
repeatedly lying to a federal court in Phoenix. This was
unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own.
Last but not least, the evidence is now overwhelming that
the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries,
both grand and trial, is horribly defective for exhibiting
obvious class bias against state Citizens who are not also
federal citizens. The courts have consistently ruled that
Americans can be state Citizens without also being federal
citizens, whether or not the federal government's precious
Fourteenth Amendment was properly approved and adopted (and we
now know that it was not). Unfortunately for Congress, this
class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title
28 United States Code Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each
and every federal grand jury indictment, and each and every
federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War.
The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so
many Americans in federal prisons, with absolutely no lawful
authority whatsoever to do so. Couple that with the fact that
the U.S. incarceration rate is twice as high as it is in South
Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita.
The Kick-Back Racket: Page 2 of 3
Do you think maybe that the federal government may be
running an extortion racket here, just for money? I think so. I
know so. I can prove it. I am appalled.
Common Law Copyright
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Counselor at Law, federal witness
and Citizen of Arizona state
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
November 4, 1996
# # #
The Kick-Back Racket: Page 3 of 3
# # #
Instructions for viewing the two files
IRM1229A.PCX and IRM1229B.PCX:
As the story goes, these two files were
originally faxed into a fax/modem, then
converted into .PCX format, so they can
be viewed with the Microsoft Windows
PAINT program, which all Windows users
should have. For MS-DOS users, the files
should come in .EXE format, which only
needs to be copied into its own DOS
directory and executed like any other
DOS command.
The file IRM1229.EXE decompresses itself
and writes three files:
README.TXT (the file you are reading)
IRM1229A.PCX (page 1 of the fax)
IRM1229B.PCX (page 2 of the fax)
Except for the obvious annotations, the
page from the Internal Revenue Manual is
a faithful copy of the original. This is
the page which contains evidence of the
cash awards to the President and other
government agents, paid through "Treasury".
If President Clinton has been receiving
these cash awards of $35,000 each, then he
is violating Article I, Section 1,
Clause 7 in the U.S. Constitution, which
states that "... he shall not receive
within that Period any other Emolument
from the United States, or any of them."
Rumor also has it that an anonymous
Freedom of Information Act Request has
been filed to obtain all financial
records associated with the Performance
Management and Recognition System (PMRS)
which is mentioned in the IRM. This
rumor remains unconfirmed.
It is also rumored that the Department
of Defense is intervening to protect
the agents who first filed this FOIA
request, because the results are likely
to cause widespread exposure of the multiple
frauds being perpetrated by the IRS against
the American People on behalf of foreign
principals involved in a criminal syndicate
of extortion, mail fraud, and outright
terrorism. This rumor also remains
unconfirmed.
# # #
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Washington, D.C. 20224
September 12, 1996
Mr. Paul A. Mitchell Person to Contact:
2509 North Campbell - #1776 M. Zolton
Tucson, AZ 85719 Telephone Number:
(202) 622-6250
Refer Reply to:
96-1911
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
This is in reponse to your July 26, 1996, Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request for all financial records of the
Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS). Your
request was forwarded to us by the Office of Disclosure Services,
Department of the Treasury, so that we can respond to you
directly. We apologize for the delay in responding.
Unfortunately, your request is not specific enough to allow
us to conduct a search for the records that are of interest to
you. For example, you have not stated the years for which you
are interested in obtaining records. Please be advised that the
PMRS has not existed for the last 3 years. In addition, it is
our understanding that awards made under PMRS took the form of
cash payments or quality step in-grade promotions. Therefore,
the types of financial records associated with awards made under
PMRS did not include the kinds of records mentioned in your
request. It would be helpful if you could be more specific in
descibing the desired records.
Accordingly, you may wish to reformulate your request to
assist us in finding the responsive material. If you decide to
do so, your perfected request will receive our close attention.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Mark L. Zolton
Tax Law Specialist
FOIA Branch
# # #
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA REPUBLIC
September 19, 1996
Mark L. Zolton
Tax Law Specialist
FOIA Branch
"Internal Revenue Service"
Washington [zip code exempt]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Subject: FOIA for PMRS Records
Your Ref. No. 96-1911
Dear Mr. Zolton:
Thank you for your letter to Me, dated September 12, 1996.
In that letter, you say that We failed to state the years for
which We are interested in obtaining records. In answer to that
point: We want records for the years 1776 Anno Domini through
and including 2020 Anno Domini. The latter year (2020) appears
on the IRS assessment records for a client of mine. Under oath,
the IRS agent who signed these records testified that this date
(2020) was not a mistake.
We are desirous of obtaining any and all financial records
associated with the PMRS, including but not limited to the names
of all persons who received any kind of "recognition" from this
system, e.g. the President as mentioned in the Internal Revenue
Manual page in question, employees of the federal government, and
all others, without exception. We presume the IRM reference is
to the President of the United States. Your records should
confirm whether or not any Presidents of the United States have
received any "recognition" from this system, how much, when, and
which ones. See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
and Counselor at Law
# # #
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA REPUBLIC
November 5, 1996
Mr. Kenneth Starr
Independent Counsel
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 490-North
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone <20004>
Subject: IRS Kick-Backs to President from the
Performance Management and Recognition System
("PMRS")
Dear Mr. Starr:
I have evidence in my possession which implicates President
William Jefferson Clinton in the receipt of illegal IRS kick-
backs from a defunct federal program called Performance
Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). As of yesterday, the
Alta Vista search engine found some 20 documents on the Internet
which mention this system.
To obtain more information about PMRS, I have already submitted a
Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") request to the Department of
the Treasury for all financial records of the PMRS. Quite to my
surprise, Mr. Mark L. Zolton wrote back to explain that some
records do not exist, because the rewards were paid in cash.
For your information, I have decided to become rather politically
active in this matter. Enclosed please find my essay entitled
"The Kick-Back Racket: Performance Management and Recognition
System," which I enclose for your consideration and review.
Please accept this as my firm offer to testify before a competent
and qualified federal grand jury in this matter. I wish this
matter to be investigated fully, and that is the main reason why
I have brought it to your attention at this time.
If I can assist you, or any others in your office, in the course
of investigating PMRS, please contact me immediately.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law, federal witness
and Citizen of Arizona state
enclosures
copy: Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail