Time: Tue Nov 26 07:39:33 1996
To: Jonathan Craft <jcraft@hitel.com>,dminer1380@aol.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: The Kick-Back Racket
Cc: 
Bcc: 

At 08:27 AM 11/26/96 EST, you wrote:
>Salutations.
>
>Could you e-mail me a copy of "The Kick Back Racket?"  I
>lost my e-copy.

merged at end of this message

>
>An accountant I know is in prison.  She was convicted
>of some ludicrously bogus "embezzelment" charge.  I
>was told the prosecutor received $25,000 (tax free)
>for her conviction and another $5000 for putting it
>in the paper.  I know she doesn't file 1040.

Mark L. Zolton in IRS admitted, 
in writing, that PMRS awards
were paid in cash (no records).
See his letter merged below.


>
>I know of a few other people who would be interested
>in the "Kick Back...". 

see "Supreme Law Library" at URL

  http://www.supremelaw.com


 Could you also mail a copy
>to "dminer1380@aol.com".

consider it done.


 David Miner is a friend
>of mine.  He has written a book "Tax Answers
>the IRS doesn't want you to have" which is probably
>on of the best "introductory" books to the income
>tax fraud.

How much does he sell it for?


>
>Any word from the IRS re: statutes imposing a liability
>on individual/entites under FOIA?

Yes, the letter is waiting in 
my inbox to be processed.  They
mentioned the 16th Amendment.


>
>Jonathan Craft
>jcraft@hitel.com


[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


For Immediate Release                            November 4, 1996

                      The Kick-Back Racket:
                   Performance Management and
                       Recognition System

                               by

                      Paul Andrew Mitchell
                       All Rights Reserved
                         (October 1996)


     It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of
a conspiracy  of silence which has descended upon the District of
Columbia in  recent months,  that President  Clinton has a lot of
explaining to  do, in  quite a few executive departments.  One of
the best  suppressed stories  of his  administration thus  far is
evidence of  White House  kick-backs from  the  Internal  Revenue
Service ("IRS")  for each  and every indictment issued by federal
grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are.

     The term  itself is  an oxymoron,  because protest has never
been illegal  in America.   Protest  is even  recognized  by  the
federal  government's   precious  Uniform   Commercial  Code  for
repudiating presentments  in a lawful manner.  So, for the phrase
"illegal tax  protestor" to  withstand the obvious constitutional
challenge (yes,  the First  Amendment is still the supreme Law in
America), the  adjective "illegal"  must modify  the noun  "tax."
This is  a telling  admission on the part of our vaulted Congress
of what  many Americans  have known  for a long time, namely, the
federal income  tax is  a total  and utter  fraud, from  stem  to
stern.   Our Ship  of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with
loop-holes and sinking fast.

     What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which
the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak
the truth.   A  key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM")
clearly shows  that the President routinely receives $35,000 from
the Performance  Management and  Recognition System ("PMRS").  We
have a  political prisoner  in federal  custody right  now who is
prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and
every time  a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any
illegal tax  protestor ("ITP").   U.S.  Attorneys receive  a mere
$25,000 per indictment of ITP's.

     Now, if  the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task
force in  place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the
former Pilot  Connection Society  which has been reported to have
over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if
his hench-persons  in the  DOJ succeed  in  bringing  grand  jury
indictments against  all 5,000.   Let's  see, 5,000 times $35,000
equals $175,000,000.   The bad news for President Clinton is that
the IRM  provides absolutely  no authority for these "performance
recognition  rewards"   (read   "kick-backs").      Courts   have
consistently ruled  that the  IRM has  no more  authority than  a
pizza recipe,  when it  comes to  authorizing salaries  and other


               The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 1 of 3

compensation for  federal government employees.  Federal employee
salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a
far cry from that high standard of law.

     Furthermore, the  Constitution forbids  the  President  from
receiving any  other "emoluments" during his term of office.  See
Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within
that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of
them."   A FOIA  request by  this author  for  all  PMRS  records
produced an  admission, on  Treasury Department  letterhead, that
some records  do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash.
This is  bad enough.   But, when you couple these kick-backs with
the perjury  racket now rampant within the Department of Just US,
and with  a grand  jury system  which badly needs either complete
overhaul or  abolition, you  quickly find  that  the  indictments
issuing from  federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the
Internal Revenue  Code, are  really threats,  engineered  by  the
biggest extortion  racket  this  planet  has  ever  seen.    Jury
tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do
a far better job of describing what is really going on.

     In one  recent grand  jury case,  involving a  subpoena  for
certain books  and records,  a federal judge in Arizona conspired
with the  Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of
mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction
of justice,  and 27  counts of  conspiracy to  commit all  of the
above.  When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to
investigate probable  violations of  federal law by the AUSA, the
judge intercepted  this certified  request,  and  all  subsequent
pleadings which  were then  directed to the grand jury by Counsel
in order  to keep  them informed  of what  was really  going  on.
These pleadings  contained crucial  evidence -- you guessed it --
of the  PMRS kick-back  racket, and  of a pattern of pathological
lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for
repeatedly lying  to a  federal  court  in  Phoenix.    This  was
unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own.

     Last but  not least,  the evidence  is now overwhelming that
the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries,
both grand  and  trial,  is  horribly  defective  for  exhibiting
obvious class  bias against  state  Citizens  who  are  not  also
federal citizens.    The  courts  have  consistently  ruled  that
Americans can  be  state  Citizens  without  also  being  federal
citizens,  whether  or  not  the  federal  government's  precious
Fourteenth Amendment  was properly  approved and  adopted (and we
now know  that it  was not).   Unfortunately  for Congress,  this
class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title
28 United  States Code  Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each
and every  federal grand  jury indictment,  and  each  and  every
federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War.

     The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so
many Americans  in federal  prisons, with  absolutely  no  lawful
authority whatsoever  to do  so.   Couple that with the fact that
the U.S.  incarceration rate  is twice  as high as it is in South
Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita.



               The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 2 of 3

     Do you  think maybe  that  the  federal  government  may  be
running an extortion racket here, just for money?  I think so.  I
know so.  I can prove it.  I am appalled.


Common Law Copyright
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Counselor at Law, federal witness
and Citizen of Arizona state
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
November 4, 1996


                             #  #  #






               The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 3 of 3


                           #  #  #


Instructions for viewing the two files
IRM1229A.PCX and IRM1229B.PCX:

As the story goes, these two files were
originally faxed into a fax/modem, then
converted into .PCX format, so they can
be viewed with the Microsoft Windows 
PAINT program, which all Windows users
should have.  For MS-DOS users, the files
should come in .EXE format, which only
needs to be copied into its own DOS 
directory and executed like any other
DOS command.

The file IRM1229.EXE decompresses itself
and writes three files:  

     README.TXT   (the file you are reading)
     IRM1229A.PCX (page 1 of the fax)
     IRM1229B.PCX (page 2 of the fax)

Except for the obvious annotations, the
page from the Internal Revenue Manual is
a faithful copy of the original.  This is
the page which contains evidence of the
cash awards to the President and other
government agents, paid through "Treasury".

If President Clinton has been receiving
these cash awards of $35,000 each, then he
is violating Article I, Section 1, 
Clause 7 in the U.S. Constitution, which
states that "... he shall not receive
within that Period any other Emolument
from the United States, or any of them."

Rumor also has it that an anonymous 
Freedom of Information Act Request has
been filed to obtain all financial 
records associated with the Performance
Management and Recognition System (PMRS)
which is mentioned in the IRM.  This 
rumor remains unconfirmed.

It is also rumored that the Department
of Defense is intervening to protect 
the agents who first filed this FOIA
request, because the results are likely
to cause widespread exposure of the multiple 
frauds being perpetrated by the IRS against
the American People on behalf of foreign
principals involved in a criminal syndicate
of extortion, mail fraud, and outright
terrorism.  This rumor also remains 
unconfirmed.


                           #  #  #


                   Department of the Treasury                    
                    Internal Revenue Service
                     Washington, D.C. 20224
                                
                                
                       September 12, 1996
                                
Mr. Paul A. Mitchell                           Person to Contact:
2509 North Campbell - #1776                    M. Zolton
Tucson, AZ 85719                               Telephone Number:
                                               (202) 622-6250
                                               Refer Reply to:
                                               96-1911

Dear Mr. Mitchell:

     This is in reponse to your July 26, 1996, Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request for all financial records of the
Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS).  Your
request was forwarded to us by the Office of Disclosure Services,
Department of the Treasury, so that we can respond to you
directly.  We apologize for the delay in responding.

     Unfortunately, your request is not specific enough to allow
us to conduct a search for the records that are of interest to
you.  For example, you have not stated the years for which you
are interested in obtaining records.  Please be advised that the
PMRS has not existed for the last 3 years.  In addition, it is
our understanding that awards made under PMRS took the form of
cash payments or quality step in-grade promotions.  Therefore,
the types of financial records associated with awards made under
PMRS did not include the kinds of records mentioned in your
request.  It would be helpful if you could be more specific in
descibing the desired records.

     Accordingly, you may wish to reformulate your request to
assist us in finding the responsive material.  If you decide to
do so, your perfected request will receive our close attention.

                                               Sincerely yours,

                                               /s/ Mark L. Zolton

                                               Tax Law Specialist
                                               FOIA Branch


                           #  #  #


                                      c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776                                                     Tucson [zip code exempt]
                                                 ARIZONA REPUBLIC

                                               September 19, 1996
Mark L. Zolton
Tax Law Specialist
FOIA Branch
"Internal Revenue Service"
Washington [zip code exempt]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Subject:  FOIA for PMRS Records
          Your Ref. No. 96-1911

Dear Mr. Zolton:

Thank you for your letter to Me, dated September 12, 1996.

In that  letter, you  say that  We failed  to state the years for
which We  are interested in obtaining records.  In answer to that
point:   We want  records for  the years 1776 Anno Domini through
and including  2020 Anno  Domini.  The latter year (2020) appears
on the  IRS assessment records for a client of mine.  Under oath,
the IRS  agent who  signed these records testified that this date
(2020) was not a mistake.

We are  desirous of  obtaining  any  and  all  financial  records
associated with  the PMRS, including but not limited to the names
of all  persons who  received any kind of "recognition" from this
system, e.g.  the President  as mentioned in the Internal Revenue
Manual page in question, employees of the federal government, and
all others,  without exception.   We presume the IRM reference is
to the  President of  the United  States.   Your  records  should
confirm whether  or not  any Presidents of the United States have
received any  "recognition" from this system, how much, when, and
which ones.  See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
and Counselor at Law


                           #  #  #


                                      c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
                                         Tucson [zip code exempt]
                                                 ARIZONA REPUBLIC

                                                 November 5, 1996
Mr. Kenneth Starr
Independent Counsel
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 490-North
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone <20004>

Subject:  IRS Kick-Backs to President from the
          Performance Management and Recognition System
          ("PMRS")

Dear Mr. Starr:

I have  evidence in  my  possession  which  implicates  President
William Jefferson  Clinton in  the receipt  of illegal  IRS kick-
backs  from   a  defunct   federal  program   called  Performance
Management and Recognition System ("PMRS").  As of yesterday, the
Alta Vista  search engine found some 20 documents on the Internet
which mention this system.

To obtain more information about PMRS, I have already submitted a
Freedom of  Information Act ("FOIA") request to the Department of
the Treasury  for all financial records of the PMRS.  Quite to my
surprise, Mr.  Mark L.  Zolton wrote  back to  explain that  some
records do not exist, because the rewards were paid in cash.

For your information, I have decided to become rather politically
active in  this matter.   Enclosed  please find my essay entitled
"The Kick-Back  Racket: Performance  Management  and  Recognition
System," which I enclose for your consideration and review.

Please accept this as my firm offer to testify before a competent
and qualified  federal grand  jury in  this matter.   I wish this
matter to  be investigated fully, and that is the main reason why
I have brought it to your attention at this time.

If I  can assist you, or any others in your office, in the course
of investigating PMRS, please contact me immediately.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Counselor at Law, federal witness
and Citizen of Arizona state

enclosures

copy:  Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit


                           #  #  #






























































      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail