PUBLIC NOTICE TO COPYRIGHT VIOLATORS


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on July 21, 1998 at 19:15:01:

In Reply to: Re: PUBLIC NOTICE TO COPYRIGHT VIOLATORS posted by Pi on July 21, 1998 at 16:34:28:

See URL:

http://supremelaw.com/wwwboard/messages/1194.html


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Author of "The Federal Zone: Cracking
the Code of Internal Revenue" (all editions),
under a pen name


: Paul,

: With all due respect I hereby offer a little background on my particular
: situation that may enable you to understand the futility of your current
: course of action.

: First, because you are "attacking" me with your "threat" of legal action
: you "force" me to respond to your notice of alleged copyright violation.

: Second, I have "infinite" legal resources so you will not win an extended
: legal battle. I say extended legal battle because if I do not win quickly
: then my automated legal response system (ALR) will bury you. If you also
: have an ALR then the "battle" is useless, we are both infinately capable.

: "Would you like to play a game of chess?" :o)

: Okay, now onto the more specific issues:

: 1) You, or your author/client, gave me written permission to use
: the bibliography via e-mail.

: 2) Since I no longer have a copy of that written document in my
: possession I am willing to remove the page if desired and
: requested IN WRITING.

: 3) If you fail to advise me as to a course of action that would
: be agreeable to you short of an actual court action then you
: forgo any possibility of winning this case.

: 4) I did not personally profit from the utilization of your
: legal bibliography on my website.

: 5) I can document that the bibilography has been on my website
: ever since the publication of your book online and you DID
: NOTHING to advise me of copyright violation since then
: therefore you did not "agressively" defend your copyright
: "against me" therefore I can show that I am not a "threat"
: to you.

: 6) Since I am willing to comply with your desired course of
: non-legal action then any further communication by you to
: me that does not specifically express this action will be
: documentation of harassment.

: So, in conclusion, I would like to say that any legal action against me
: will simply a fun exercise for me and a large expense to you.

: 4) I did not personally profit from the utilization of your
: legal bibliography on my website.

: 5) I can document that the bibilography has been on my website
: ever since the publication of your book online and you DID
: NOTHING to advise me of copyright violation since then
: therefore you did not "agressively" defend your copyright
: "against me" therefore I can show that I am not a "threat"
: to you.

: 6) Since I am willing to comply with your desired course of
: non-legal action then any further communication by you to
: me that does not specifically express this action will be
: documentation of harassment.

: So, in conclusion, I would like to say that any legal action against me
: will simply a fun exercise for me and a large expense to you.

: My personal goal in life is to exist in harmony with those around me.

: Do you want harmony or do you want a battle (I can provide either)?

: Your move...

: - pi -
: pi@PiPhD.com





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]