Once valid links are contributory infringements

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on July 22, 1998 at 13:53:37:

In Reply to: Re: Can you say IDIOT? posted by Eat my shorts, dude. on July 22, 1998 at 11:24:01:

[Editor's Note:
There is now an important Editor's Warning
in the following message:
with special emphasis on standing court precedent concerning
links to stolen property as contributory copyright infringements.
The damaged author also emphatically objects to the defamations below.]

We regard as contributory infringements
all links which did (or still do) point
to a valid URL. Such violating links
have now been found pointing to the
following Internet Domains:


(and others not shown here)

Please confer at the glossary and related
documents of the Software Publishers
Association at Internet URL:


Last but not least, I object emphatically
to the defamation, per se, which is found
in the message below.

Perhaps the guilty party will have enough
courage to publish his (her) name here.

Until then, you can count yourself among
the many criminals who pollute the Internet
with the very same kind of garbage which now
spews from your keyboard.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

: What a total loser. I got one of these
: harassing legal threats about a web page that
: doesn't even have the "link of doom" on it.

: I would expect that Mr. Mitchell would
: "do his homework" before threatening people
: on this.

: I would also expect any lawyer that didn't get
: a degree from a crackerjacks (tm) box to
: understand the concept of harassment.

: I wonder if a class-action harassment suit from
: all of the tortured parties would deterr him
: from sending out any more of this crap.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]