Re: Does our government still represent and serve State Citizens???

Subject:

Comments:
: : : You will note, with some interest (I hope), : : that not a single federal court has ever : : admitted that we have two (2) classes of : : citizenship in America, even though state : : courts have done so, in so many words. : : If I am wrong here, please correct me : : immediately (and I do WANT to be wrong : : about this!) Despite its obvious importance, : : I do not recall that Alla v. Kornfeld actually : : issued this key holding ("two classes" [sic]), : : even though the existence of two classes can : : be inferred easily from that correct case. : : I hope, by now, that the far-reaching : : implications of two classes are beginning : : to be understood, and appreciated, by everyone : : who participates in this forum. Take, for : : example, the fundamental principle of equal : : protection. Are the two classes receiving : : equal protection today? My answer: NO! : : One class can vote, the other cannot vote! : : One can make law, the other cannot make law! : : Moreover, the notion of a "national citizen" : : is simply not supported by the relevant : : history and pertinent cases. For the same : : reason, we have a "federal" government and : : not a "national" government. The term : : "national of the United States" is the product : : of federal statutes (which Congress CAN change) : : and not a term found in the Constitution : : (which Congress can NOT change). : : The term "United States" in the Qualifications : : Clauses means "States United". See People v. : : De La Guerra for authority. It does NOT refer : : to the "nation" [sic] (i.e. one of the other : : meanings for that term, as defined in Black's, : : which cites Hooven & Allison v. Evatt). : : Pablo De La Guerra was a California judge who : : signed the original California Constitution : : of 1849. He would know! : : : : /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : : Counselor at Law, Private Attorney General

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: