Posted by Dean Arthur on April 29, 1997 at 11:23:14:
I studied common law under George Gordon's (Basrrister's Inn School of
Common Law, Boise, Idaho, 1985) tutelage. His theory of procedure was to
pull up the tracks the engine of "justice" runs on, wait til the engine
ran off the tracks, then bash out its headlight.
Carl Miller of Michigan says that the Citizen cannot lawfully be
convicted of doing what the Constitution and the Supreme Court say is
protected. And he provides a string of Supreme Court cites to back up
his claims. (i.e., Murdock v. Pennsylvania "No state may convert a
constitutional secured right into a privilege, issue a license for its
exercise and charge a fee for its use." Shuttleworth v. City of
Birmingham, Alabama "If a state does convert a Constitutional secured
right into a privilege, issues a license for its exercise and charges a
fee for its use, the citizen can ignore the law with impunity." Miranda
v. Arizona, "Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there
can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.", etc..
(Proclaim Liberty Ministry, P. O. Box 339, Adrian, Mich 49221 Carl Miller
VHS tapes 324, 325, 326 [45.00 + 3.00 S&H] six hours total)
Now David Wynn Miller (no relation) of Ohio teaches how to go into state
court to establish the Knowledge and Neglect through Will of Intent of
those of Oath an Affirmation in order to claim the up to $5,085,300 per
individual of Oath an Affirmation in the courtroom who has aided and
abetted in the injuries done to the Citizen because of the claimed
wrongdoing as to her/his private affairs. Each of the Officers of the
court (i.e., Judge, Clerk of Court, Bailiff, and EVERY attorney present
in the courtroom) has sworn an Oath to obey, protect and support the
Constitution of these United States in America and that of the State in
which the court is located. That Oath, filed with the corporation of the
city, county or state is a security instrument which is a blank check
good for the amount claimed for their Perjury of Oath and Constructive
Treason against the national and state constitutions. If you are
convicted of a crime and sentenced to "pay an or stay" you may have
grounds for a Title 42 suit for Knowledge and Neglect on their part..
The appeal process was started by the bar associations as a means by
which you forgive their wrongdoing and prevent yourself from filing a
damage suit. You are saying that there was a technial fault in your
trial but that the actions of the trial were correct except for that
fault. You are addmitting that the evidence was correct and the verdict
for your wrongdoing was a correct one. You are attempting to get the
verdict overturned due to a procedural error not because the whole thing
was a farce done without due process.
If you would truly enjoy your perceived rights, protected by the
Constitution and secured to you by Supreme Court decisions then you must
stop these farces perpetrated by attorneys and upheld by judges of less
than honorable intent toward those whom the oath says the judges and
attorneys will protect.
Call 1-414-466-3584 and ask for Procedural Seminar material from the St.
George Seminar of March 15, 1997. You may be glad you did IF you have
the intestinal fortitude to stand up for what you claim to be your
rights. It all devolves on each of us to stand and be counted, not to
put our faith in attorneys an or judges.