Posted by Dan on April 30, 1997 at 00:02:09:
In Reply to: Re: Use the USC? posted by Dean Arthur on April 29, 1997 at 11:03:46:
: The men/women of Oath an Affirmation are UNDER the U.S.C..
: If Citizen In Party makes a special visit upon the court
: to expose the Knowledge and Neglect of 42 USC 1986 which
: with others of Oath an Affirmation set up the conspiracy
: to deprive other Citizens In Party of rights protected
: per 42 USC 1985, thus causing an injury due to such
: deprivation of rights under 42 USC 1983 then the Citizen
: In Party has set his case in stone IF the Complaint
: contains NONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
: 1. adjectives
: 2. adverbs
: 3. assumptions
: 4. conclusions
: 5. presumptions
: 6. pronouns
: Remember the following rules of procedure which are NOT taught
: in law schools:
: 1. No fact may introduced into evidence.
: 2. All facts must be:
: a) Timely
: b) Highly defined
Thanks for the reply but... I'm still a little
confused: I think my question was worded badly,
what I was trying to ask was in all the Affadavits
of recission, Affadavits of State Citizenship,
etc..., that people are posting/selling on the
internet, the authors of these forms use the
IRC, the USC, and the CFR to bolster and
substantiate rights and claims of status, and to
PROTECT THEMSELVES by these federally created
statutes. Aren't they then "having their cake
and eating it too?" In other words how can one
state that you are free of jurisdiction by the
IRS by using the IRC to bolster that argument.
and how can one use the UCC or CFR to protect
oneselft when you are already probably protected
by the Constitution and Laws that do apply to
you? (side: why wouldn't one have the right to
have cake and eat it too, what a dumb saying,
i'm sorry i used it now.)