Re: FREEDOM VIDEO

Subject:

Comments:
: : : I AM PRODUCING A VIDEO FOR "THE COMMON MAN"; YOU KNOW, THE HEALTHY HARD-WORKING PERSON WHO FEARS THE GOV'T. I AM A TV AND FILM WRITER / PRODUCER (UCLA FILMSCHOOL, MOVIES OF THE WEEK, FEATURES, AND ALL THAT), BUT AM TAKING THIS TIME TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT. I WISH TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE LAYPERSON THAT HIS FREEDOM(!!) CAN BE RE-ATTAINED. I HAVE RESEARCHED SOVEREIGNTY AND FREEDOM TECHNOLOGY AND COOKING VULTURES AND HAVE YET TO DISCOVER A STRAIGHT-FORWARD METHOD OF "SETTING ONE'S SELF FREE". I WANT TO MAKE THIS VIDEO SO OTHERS CAN BECOME AWARE OF THE "MOVEMENT" BUT THIS MOVEMENT IS CONFUSING. I NEED TWO THINGS: 1. CLEAR-CUT METHODOLOGY TO FREEDOM, 2. PEOPLE WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE. EMAIL ME. : : What a great thing you're trying to do. Spare no : : effort to get it right and you might manage to : : help coelece all the growing number of differing : : groups passionately screaming for attention in : : this Chinese fire drill we call the patriot or : : freedom movement. There are numerous : : fundamental differences of opinion we must get : : settled before we can be confident in our : : "big guns" aimed at the heart of tyrrany. : : For example: : : 1. There are several sides to the question of what : : kind of "law" operates in the courts today: admiralty/maritime, : : martial/military, commercial, international, Roman : : civil, Lieber code, a Law-Equity hybrid, or a : : mix of some or all of these. : : 2. Some document the legitimate use of citizen : : "common law" courts. Others, like the California : : Jural Society and The Patrick Henry Foundation For : : Common Law Studies, say there is no such thing as a : : common law court only courts at common law which : : they lawfully and painstakingly set up through : : jural societies. Still others claim there is no : : common law to be appealed to any more since Eire : : Railroad vs. Thompkins combined common law with : : equity in 1938. These like the Restoring America : : people claim that our only access to common : : law principles now is through the Constitution, : : particularly the petition, free association : : clauses and most especially the article I contract : : liberties. However Jeff Ganoposki (Church of The : : Living Word, Atlanta) claims in his books that the : : Constitution was set up to govern the people of : : the UNITED STATES not the people of the united : : States of America, i.e. since it's a contract and : : only signitaries and their ensigns can be affected, : : the Constitution was drafted to ensure certain : : rights to citizens who gave up their sovereignty : : in order to become "We the people"who entered : : public service or registered to vote : : (see Article II, Articles of Cofederation). : : Wacky sounding,I know, but He does make the most : : convincing argument I've read on the pro side of : : what I believe to be potentially the most divisive : : issue in the whole freedom movement. Most, it seems, : : believe that the "sovereignty" retained to the : : people means individual status at law. Others, : : like the jural societies who have the best arguments : : for the opposition, are adamant that individual : : sovereignty means anarchy, and that sovereignty is : : collective in the free and lawful citizens. Still : : other controversy exists in how or where this : : sovereignty, wherever it resides, has it's force : : and effect, i.e. passively in our protected rights, : : or actively in court, or petition, or the voting : : booth. As you can see there's as much disagreement : : on strategy and some principle among freemen as : : there is among Christians regarding orthodoxy and : : orthopraxy. Both spheres can expect progress : : towards unity in confession and cooperation : : in practice,I think, if we remember that there is : : only one true Sovereign. Whatever our status at : : law regarding sovereignty, we must regard it as : : endowed to us by our creator. It is only a derived : : sovereignty. Otherwise we may hear Him laughing : : (Proverbs 1). : : If you like, e-mail me and I'll return the URLs : : and references for the most competent resorces : : among the various camps I've found. : Roderick, : : How's the video coming? Thanks for posting my : reply. : dan

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: