Re: Legal definition of driving to/from work.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Common Right Group on January 27, 1998 at 06:05:51:

In Reply to: Re: Legal definition of driving to/from work. posted by Chris on January 26, 1998 at 19:49:43:

: : One would presume that what you said about AND is
: : true. However, look at how both California and
: : Arizona twist its meaning. Both have similar
: : constitutional provisions which state that "in a
: : criminal proceeding the accused shall have the
: : right to appear and defend in person AND by counsel."
: : The Religious Order of Black Frocks in both states
: : have ruled that in this instance, AND means OR. In
: : other words, you may appear and defend in person, or
: : you may appear and defend by counsel, but not both.
: : I submit that the drafters of both state provisions
: : knew the difference between the operation or AND
: : and OR. But then, how do you prevail when the
: : highest placed crooks in the state disagree? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------you used up all the spaces----------------------------------- Well you can just read that one and tell that it had to mean OR. It does not read grammatically correct as AND, only as OR. JMHO.

On the advise of counsel, we don't get into arguments. English professors from two universities have been our source on this statement. They also state that the statement IS gramatically correct, just not common form. That's how the Code Commissioners confuse the sheeple with their restatements of the law. Of course, the code is NOT the law. Check statutes.
Counsel also advises we not argue with idiots, so if you want to argue, go ahead - alone.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]