Does 28 U.S.C. 451 destroy "Karma"? Answer: NO!

Subject:

Comments:
: By mistake, I omitted the full cite : to McAllister: : McAllister v. U.S. : 141 U.S. 174, 11 S.Ct. 949, : 35 L.Ed. 693 (1891) : /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, Federal Witness : and Private Attorney General : : : : Here are more pertinent authorities in re : : the two classes of federal district courts: : : 8. District courts of United States-- : : Generally : : Term "District Court of the United States," : : standing alone indicates only constitutional : : courts. U.S. v. King, 119 F.Supp. 398 (1954), : : 14 Alaska 500 : : [28 U.S.C.A. 451, Notes of Decisions] : : : : "This title", as used in said section 451 : : [of the Judiciary Code] must refer to Title 28, : : the Title in which the Tucker Act appears; : : and Alaska [had] no court constituted by : : said Chapter 5 [in the year 1954]. : : [U.S. v. King, 119 F.Supp. 398 : : (D.C. Alaska 1954)] : : : : In 1891, the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed : : a number of pertinent cases on this point, : : as follows: : : "... [U]pon the theory that a territorial court : : is one of those mentioned in article three : : of the Constitution ... numerous decisions : : of this [Supreme] court are inconsistent with : : that theory. To these decisions we will now : : advert." : : citing: : : * American Insurance Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton, : : 26 U.S.(1 Pet.) 511, 546, : : 7 L.Ed. 242, 256 : : * Benner v. Porter, : : 50 U.S. (9 How.) 235, 242, 243, : : 13 L.Ed. 119, 123 : : * Clinton v. Englebrecht, : : 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 434, 447, : : 20 L.Ed. 659, 662 : : * Hornbuckle v. Toombs, : : 85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 648, 655, : : 21 L.Ed. 966, 967 : : * Good v. Martin, : : 95 U.S. 90, 95, : : 24 L.Ed. 341, 343 : : * Reynolds v. U.S., : : 98 U.S. 145, 154, : : 25 L.Ed. 244, 246 : : * The City of Panama, : : 101 U.S. 453, 460, : : 25 L.Ed. 1061, 1064 : : "These cases close all discussion here as to : : whether territorial courts are of the class : : defined in the third article of the : : Constitution. It must be regarded as settled : : that courts in the Territories, created under : : the plenary municipal authority that Congress : : possesses over the Territories of the United : : States, are not courts of the United States : : [sic] created under the authority conferred : : by that article." : : [McAllister supra] : : : : "Two classes of courts are created in the : : federal system for the exercise of the : : necessary original jurisdiction, but in the : : Territory, as provided in the Organic Act, : : there is but one class of courts created : : for that purpose." : : [The City of Panama supra at page 1063] : : : : I hope this helps. : : : : Sincerely yours, : : /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : : Counselor at Law, Federal Witness : : and Private Attorney General

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: