"BOHICA, Berg and Obama et al.:
What are the Feds REALLY Hiding?"


Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

October 24, 2008 A.D.

(updated July 26, 2009 A.D.)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



Our answer to that question is already well documented in numerous
documents and court pleadings now archived in the Supreme Law Library
on the Internet.  A good place to start, if this topic is entirely new to you,
is this essay entitled "Before and After the Civil War":


Prior to the Civil War, there was only one class of State Citizens:


Because the Qualifications Clauses have never been amended, such People
are STILL identified in the Constitution as Citizens of the United States.
Note well the UPPER-CASE "C" in "Citizens".  As one-time California Judge
Pablo de la Guerra explained so clearly, the term "United States" in
all three Qualifications Clauses means "States united":



Thus, the Framers should have elaborated those Clauses by
identifying the class of eligible People as "Citizens of one of the
United States of America":  the proper name for our supreme Law
is the Constitution for the United States of America.  They did so
in the famous Northwest Ordinance, which provides us an excellent
clue as to their intent when drafting the organic (organizing version)
of the U.S. Constitution.  We cover that history in this Chapter
of the book I authored:



See also 28 U.S.C. 1746 -- the ONLY place in all of Title 28
of the U.S. Code where the term "United States of America"
occurs, by the way:


Bouvier's Law Dictionary also clearly explains that "USA" means the
Union of several States, of which there are now 50 in number:


After the Civil War, a second class of "federal citizens" was created
specifically for members of the black race who were freed by the
Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery and involuntary servitude.

Unfortunately for numerous generations of Americans born after the Civil War,

Congress chose instead to identify these second-class people as

"citizens of the United States" instead of using the unique term

"federal citizens".

Confer now at "Federal citizenship" in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition!
Once you come to understand the FRAUD here, you will see how this one
definition is very condemning of the CONgress that proposed the infamous
Fourteenth amendment (lower-case "a").

Yes, it's hard to believe, but the ONLY difference between the two classes,
as far as their current and legally correct nomenclature is concerned,
is the UPPER-CASE "C" in State Citizens and the lower-case "c" in federal citizens.

Hard to believe that CONgress would be so deceitful, isn't it?

Well, then you had better buckle down and start looking into the
CONgress that introduced the infamous Fourteenth "amendment":


We deliberately use a lower-case "a" in "amendment" because
the Utah Supreme Court has already demolished the lies issued
falsely to prop up its ratification, in Dyett v. Turner.  Find it here
after it was filed in a Federal District Court in order to require
the Court's mandatory judicial notice that 27 is still less than 28
(always has been and always will be):

(don't miss the dramatic ending!!)

The rest of this sordid story is laid out in enormous detail
in our now classic book entitled "The Federal Zone":



And, to bring you right up-to-date about the lawsuit that is
now pending in Philadelphia -- the cradle of American Liberty --
which my office has filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit, also in Philly:

(follow the links and follow the money;  more links below!)

Even conservative luminaries like Joel Skousen
have chosen to overlook the pertinent historical facts
and STILL standing court cases that should have
decided that lawsuit in a New York minute.

If you don't educate yourself about all of these frauds
now being forced down your throat by corrupt politicians
and corrupt judges -- being paid handsomely by the
proceeds they derive from various extortion rackets
still ongoing in this country -- then you had better stop
complaining and resign yourself to a BOHICA posture:

Bend Over [because] Here It Comes Again!!


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



p.s.  The United States ex rel. intervention in Berg v. Obama et al.

is in the Supreme Law Library here on the Internet:



http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/nad02.htm (cf. Official Report)