CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND
TO: Beverly A. Ginn
Principal Assistant City Attorney
City of Tucson Police Department
c/o 270 S. Stone Avenue
Tucson 85701-1917/tdc
ARIZONA STATE
FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law
DATE: November 8, 1997
SUBJECT: Challenge to Rule 8 in body, and in practice:
Citation #5668482
Dear Ms. Ginn:
Rule 8 of the Local Rules of Practice and Procedure, City Court
[sic], City of Tucson, states, in pertinent part, that:
(a) If a hearing is set on the complaint or citation, the
court shall promptly provide the defendant with written
notice that the right to be represented by counsel is
waived[,] unless the defendant notifies the court and the
City in writing at least 10 days prior to the hearing date
of defendant's election to be represented by counsel. Such
notice shall specify the appropriate place and manner for
filing the notice of counsel."
[brackets added]
Formal demand is hereby made of you to provide Me with a
certified copy of said written notice, and deliver same to the
mailing location shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday,
November 21, 1997. Arraignment was set for 9:00 a.m. on 10/30/97.
VERIFICATION
I hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the
United States of America, without the "United States" (federal
government), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1), that no such written
notice was ever provided to Me, promptly or otherwise.
Executed on November 8, 1997
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson 85719/tdc
ARIZONA STATE (See USPS Publication #221.)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
copy: Clerk of Tucson City Court [sic]
City Prosecutor
email: supremelawfirm@altavista.net
website: http://supremelaw.com
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Arizona v. Mitchell