[D R A F T]
Puerto Rican Special Agent Cardenas
Federal Alcohol Administration
a/k/a "Internal Revenue Service"
a/k/a "Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue"
a/k/a "Bureau of Internal Revenue"
a/k/a "Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Puerto Rico"
a/k/a "Director, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division"
a/k/a "Puerto Rico Special Fund (Internal Revenue)"
a/k/a "Philippine Special Fund (Internal Revenue)"
a/k/a "Director International Operations"
a/k/a "Assistant Commissioner (International)"
a/k/a "Internal Revenue/District Director, Ogden, Utah"
[street address]
Tucson, Arizona
Robert L. Miskell
Agent of Foreign Principals
a/k/a "Assistant United States Attorney"
a/k/a "U.S. Attorney's Office"
c/o 110 S. Church Avenue, Suite 8310
Tucson, Arizona
520-620-7300
RE: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY
dated March 5, 1996
D E C L A R A T I O N
Arizona state )
) ss
Pima county )
I, Dr. Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D., Sui Juris, do
depose and declare, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of
the United States of America, without the "United States," per 28
U.S.C. 1746(1), that I have read the following statement and that
it is true, correct, and accurate to the best of My current
information, knowledge, and belief.
Further, I, Dr. Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D., Sui Juris,
do depose and declare that the attached exhibits are true,
correct, and accurate copies of the original documents, also to
the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief.
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 1 of 18
This is a response to the above cited SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY
BEFORE GRAND JURY improperly served on "New Life Health Center
Company, 484 E Speedway, Tucson, Arizona 85712", whereby the "New
Life Health Center Company" is commanded to appear and testify
before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at 9:10
a.m. on March 27, 1996 at the Grand Jury Room, Fourth Floor, of
the U.S. District Courthouse, 55 E. Broadway, Tucson, AZ 85701,
and whereby the "New Life Health Center Company" is commanded to
bring the following document(s) or object(s):
Any and all originals of the following documents (and copies
thereof made before service of this subpoena), in your
custody or subject to your control, for the period of
January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1995.
1. All financial ledgers and journals of the New Life
Health Center Company (hereinafter referred to as "New
Life") including but not limited to: the general
ledger, cash receipts journal, sales journal, cash
disbursements journal, voucher register, and any other
ledgers and journals maintained by New Life.
2. All banking records of New Life including but not
limited to: a) bank statements, canceled checks, check
books, check stubs or registers, check vouchers, and
deposit slips; b) all savings account records; c) all
records of certificates of deposit and other time
deposits purchased or redeemed; and d) records of all
safe deposit boxes.
This is My statement of facts, objections, assertions,
denials, and conclusions, but not necessarily My only or final
such statement. A copy of the instant Subpoena is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full, and
identified as Exhibit "A".
FACTS
The above cited entities are the literal aliases of the
Federal Alcohol Administration. I further depose and declare:
1. That Special Agent Cardenas is a duly authorized
Commonwealth Internal Revenue Agent of the Department of the
Treasury of Puerto Rico, as evidenced by 27 CFR Ch. 1, Sect.
250.11;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 2 of 18
2. That the Secretary of the Treasury, in whom all
administrative and enforcement authority is vested, pursuant to
Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter "IRC") section 7801, has
determined and published that "enforcement" authority is only
redelegated to the:
a. U.S. Customs Service;
b. U.S. Secret Service;
c. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; and,
d. Federal Law Enforcement Training Center;
as evidenced by Treasury Order (hereinafter "TO") 101-05;
3. That the "Internal Revenue Service", as a known alias
of the Federal Alcohol Administration, is clearly and completely
outside of the limited scope of their enforcement authority;
4. That the terms "Director, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
Division" and "Commissioner of Internal Revenue", wherever used
in regulations, rules, instructions, and forms issued or adopted
for the administration and enforcement of the laws specified in
paragraph 2, which are in effect or in use on the effective date
of this order, shall be held to mean the Director, as evidenced
by TDO 120-01;
5. That Special Agent Cardenas is an agent attached to the
Director, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division is self-evident,
or he is operating outside of his delegated jurisdiction; and
that the term "Director, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division"
was replaced by the term "Internal Revenue Service" is evidenced
by Volume 41 of the Federal Register;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 3 of 18
13. That the "New Life Health Center Company" has never
knowingly, intentionally, or voluntarily consented to the
examination of books and records, as mandated by Delegation Order
4 (Rev. 21): "Authority to Issue Summonses, to Administer Oaths
and Certify, and to Perform Other Functions"; that said Subpoena
was not properly served because it was not served upon the
official Records Custodian of "New Life Health Center Company";
14. That there is no evidence that the "New Life Health
Center Company" is a "taxpayer"; that there has been no judicial
determination or order on record, issued by a court of competent
jurisdiction, declaring "New Life Health Center Company" to be a
"taxpayer"; that the Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201,
cannot be invoked to issue declaratory relief in matters of
federal income taxation; and that the term "taxpayer" means "a
citizen who has established or seeks to establish a constructive
reserve fund under provisions of section 511", or any person
subject to any internal revenue tax, as evidenced by IRC section
7701(a)(14); and further, that:
a. there is no evidence that the "New Life Health Center
Company" was/is now engaged in any activity relevant to
"internal revenue", i.e. Philippine special fund, as
evidenced by 31 U.S.C. 1321(2);
b. there is no evidence that the "New Life Health Center
Company" was/is now engagaed in any activity relevant to
"internal revenue", i.e. Puerto Rico special fund, as
evidenced by 31 U.S.C. 1321(62);
c. there is no evidence that the "New Life Health Center
Company" has established or seeks to establish a
constructive reserve fund under provisions of section 511;
d. there is no evidence that the "New Life Health Center
Company" is a "citizen" of Puerto Rico, as evidenced by 48
U.S.C. 733(A);
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 4 of 18
40. That there is no evidence that either the "New Life
Health Center Company" or any of its officers, agents, assigns,
or instrumentalities, was ever served with formal notice, by
either the Assistant Commissioner (International) or any District
Director(s) of Internal Revenue, to keep such records as shall
show whether or not such "person" is liable for tax under the
IRC, pursuant to Delegation Order No. 24 (Rev. 1), effective 5-
12-86: "Authority to Require Records to be Kept";
41. That Affiant has undertaken a course of study into
applicable laws and, during this course of study, discovered
that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 219, individuals employed by the
"Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service" are
"officers and employees acting as agents of foreign principals"
and "foreign" agents as described in 18 U.S.C. sections 219 and
951;
42. That Affiant, to the best of His current knowledge,
information, and belief, understands that the weekly compilation
of Presidential Documents for Monday, February 1, 1993, Volume
29, Number 4, pages 113-114, submitted on January 28, 1993, is an
official document which demonstrates that President Clinton
nominated Lloyd Bentsen to be the U.S. Governor of the
International Monetary Fund for a term of five (5) years;
15. That Title 31, United States Code, Chapter 3,
Department of the Treasury, Subchapter 1, Organization, does not
even mention, indicate, name, or even allude to an agency of the
Treasury Department known as the "Internal Revenue Service";
16. That the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has
determined and caused to be published at Part 601 of 26 CFR, that
the term "Commissioner" shall be construed to mean "Director,
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms", as evidenced by 26 CFR
601.101;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 5 of 18
19. That the term "Internal Revenue Service" means the
Puerto Rico special trust fund is evidenced by 31 U.S.C.
1321(62);
20. That Chapters 61 through 80, inclusive, of the IRC are
delegated exclusively to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms is evidenced by Treasury Order ("TO") 120-01;
21. That the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Puerto
Rico is evidenced by 27 CFR Ch. 1, Section 250.11;
25. That the Department of Justice (hereinafter "DOJ") and
the alleged "Internal Revenue Service" have an agreement to
conduct joint investigations which include perjury and rigged
evidence, as evidenced by Internal Revenue Manual Section 9230-1;
26. That the DOJ has a national policy to commit perjury
and commit other unlawful acts of rigging evidence, as evidenced
by the deposition of former Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent
William R. Stringer;
27. That Internal Revenue Manual (hereinafter "IRM"),
Handbook of Delegation Orders, MT 1229-99, page 1229-80, dated 1-
12-89, contains the following information from Exhibit 1, Chart 2:
Senior Deputy Commissioner (Continued) is Delegated
Authority to
ASSIGNMENTS
As Chairperson, Executive Resources Board, to approve the
assignment of an employee serving under a Schedule A or B
appointment to a competitive position
AWARDS
Approve monetary awards and exceptions to monetary award
scales up to and including $10,000 for any one individual or
group, and incur necessary expenses for the recognition of
contributions
Approve monetary awards and exceptions to monetary award
scales of $5,000 -- $10,000 (excluding PMRS Cash Awards) for
any one individual or group
As Chairperson, Executive Resources Board, to review and
concur in recommendations for all awards for executives
Recommend to Treasury, monetary awards of $10,001 -- $25,000
($5,001 or more for Performance Management and Recognition
System (PMRS) Cash Awards) for any one individual or group.
Recommend an additional monetary aware of $10,000 (total
$35,000) to the President through Treasury.
[emphasis added]
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 6 of 18
29. That it is evident from the above that United States
Attorneys and the President of the United States both stand to
gain large sums of money from the issuance of grand jury
indictments against "illegal tax protestors," a term invented by
the Congress to oppress lawful protest, which has always been a
sacred Right protected by the First Amendment; and that, because
the adjective "illegal" cannot lawfully modify the noun "protest"
without also violating said First Amendment, then it follows that
the adjective "illegal" must, therefore, modify the noun "tax,"
revealing a telling admission on the part of our vaulted Congress
that the income tax is, indeed, illegal as it is administered by
the Federal Alcohol Administration a/k/a and dba the "Internal
Revenue Service";
28. That a United States Attorney, acting as a prosecuting
officer, should make no attempt to influence any of the actions
of a grand jury, or to give effect to the evidence adduced; that
public employees, particularly police officers, should not avail
themselves of devices to impede and circumvent the functions of a
grand jury; and that any illegal or corrupt interference by
outsiders or attempts by outside influences to control a grand
jury's action is a contempt of court; See 38 Am Jur 2d, Sec. 33,
page 979;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 7 of 18
28. That the United States Attorney's Manual, "Title 6-
4.270 -- Tax Division," contains the following statement
concerning responsibilities of the Criminal Division of the
Department of Justice, to wit: "The Criminal Division has
limited responsibility for the prosecution of offenses
investigated by the IRS. Those offenses are: excise violations
involving liquor tax, narcotics, stamp tax, firearms, wagering,
and coin-operated gambling and amusement machines; malfeasance
offenses committed by IRS personnel; forcible rescue of seized
property; corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or
employee acting under the internal revenue laws; and
unauthorized mutilation, removal or misuse of stamps. See 28
C.F.R. Sec. 0.70."; that the instant Subpoena was signed by Mr.
Robert L. Miskell, Assistant United States Attorney ("AUSA"), and
NOT by any duly authorized Federal Grand Jury Foreperson; and,
therefore, that the scope of the Grand Jury's investigation in
the instant case must be limited to those offenses which are
itemized in this paragraph above;
28. That Puerto Rican agent Cardenas has not been delegated
authority to operate within any of the 50 states of the Union;
29. That the "New Life Health Center Company" is not
subject to any lawful investigation procedures of the Federal
Alcohol Administration a/k/a and dba the "Internal Revenue
Service"; and that the "New Life Health Center Company" is
neither a "citizen living abroad or a nonresident alien", nor is
it involved in the manufacture and/or sale of any alcohol,
tobacco or firearms, nor is it related in any way to the
Caribbean Basin Tax Treaty;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 8 of 18
30. That Puerto Rican agent Cardenas is criminally
conspiring with other U.S. Government officials to extend the
provisions of the tax laws by implication, in a clear, malicious,
and willful violation of the holdings in the cases of United
States v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story 369; American Net & Twine Co. v.
Worthington, 141 U.S. 468; Benziger v. United States, 192 U.S.
30, 55; and Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62,
62 L.Ed. 211 (1971);
31. That Puerto Rican agent Cardenas lacks delegated
authority to subpoena or otherwise summon information from the
"New Life Health Center Company";
32. That the instant Subpoena is fraudulent and
unenforceable on its face;
33. That the "New Life Health Center Company" is not a
third-party record keeper required to maintain and/or disclose
records to the "Internal Revenue Service" or to the "U.S.
District Courthouse, 55 E. Broadway, Tucson, AZ 85701"; and that
there has never been any order or judicial determination, by a
court of competent jurisdiction, that "New Life Health Center
Company" is a first-, second-, or third-party record keeper
required to maintain and/or disclose records to the "Internal
Revenue Service";
34. That the instant Subpoena is obsolete and may be used
under the terms of the Caribbean Basin Tax Treaty as authorized
by rules and regulations published by the Secretary of the
Treasury; and that Puerto Rican agent Cardenas has willfully,
capriciously, and with criminal intent, violated the published
rules and regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury and of the
Congress of the United States of America;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 9 of 18
35. That I have a legal and moral duty to report Puerto
Rican agent Cardenas' willful, malicious, and criminal violations
of applicable federal and Arizona state law, and that I have so
reported the instant violations;
36. That Puerto Rican agent Cardenas is false, fraudulent,
and capricious by representing the "Internal Revenue Service"
(a/k/a "IRS") as a lawful agency within the United States
Department of the Treasury on a United States District Court
SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY;
37. That said SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY, as
issued by a department of the executive branch of the federal
government, is an Information Collection Request (hereinafter
"ICR") which is a bootleg request because it fails to exhibit a
valid Office of Management and Budget (hereinafter "OMB") control
number and expiration date; and that, according to the clear and
unambiguous public protection provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, I have been specifically enlisted by the Congress
to enforce said Act by ignoring such a bootleg request for the
collection of information, specifically by placing it in the
trash can, to be taken to the nearest landfill, where it belongs,
to rest quietly in peace among other garbage and refuse;
37. That no court has license to rewrite enactments and
thereby make law, see Chapman v. U.S., 111 S.Ct. 1919, 1922
(1991);
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 10 of 18
38. That the federal government, by and through its
accomplices in the Federal Alcohol Administration a/k/a "Internal
Revenue Service", is attempting to extend the clear import of the
statutes by implication; that, in the interpretation of statutes
levying taxes, it is the established rule not to extend their
provisions, by implication, beyond the clear import of the
language used, or to enlarge their operations so as to embrace
matters not specifically pointed out; and that, in the case of
doubt, they are to be construed most strongly against the
government, and in favor of the Citizen, see U.S. v.
Wigglesworth, 141 U.S. 468, 474; Benziger v. U.S., 192 U.S. 38,
55; Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62 L.Ed. 211
(1917);
43. That Affiant knows the International Monetary Fund to
be an international governmental organization in accordance with
22 U.S.C. sections 285(t) and 286;
44. That the Affiant, to the best of His information,
knowledge, and belief, has read and possesses documents copied
directly from law books, and from other public documents, proving
that the International Monetary Fund has international
jurisdiction;
45. That Affiant, to the best of His information,
knowledge, and belief, has read and taken information from public
records which prove that, in accordance with Article VIII(2)(B)
of the International Monetary Fund Articles of Agreement, said
International Monetary Fund maintains multi-national use of
currencies and multi-national jurisdiction stability;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 11 of 18
46. That Affiant has been informed and believes, through
His perusal of public documents and a course of study, that Lloyd
Bentsen formerly held the position of Secretary of the
"Department of the Treasury," which is the overseer of the
"Internal Revenue Service";
47. That Affiant has read 22 U.S.C. 611, wherein the
following relevant definitions are found:
(c) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section,
the term "agent of a foreign principal" means --
(1) any person who acts as an agent, representative,
employee, or servant, or any person who acts in any
other capacity at the order, request, or under the
direction or control, of a foreign principal or of a
person any of whose activities are directly or
indirectly supervised, directed, controlled, financed,
or subsidized in whole or in major part, by a foreign
principal, and who directly or through any other person
--
(i) engages within the United States in political
activities for or in the interests of such foreign
principal;
(ii) acts within the United States as a public relations
counsel, publicity agent, information employee or
political consultant for or in the interests of such
foreign principal;
(iii) within the United States solicits, collects,
disperses, or dispenses contributions, loans money, or
other things of value for or in the interests of such
foreign principal; or
(iv) within the United States represents the interest of
such foreign principal before any agency or official of
the Government of the United States; and
(2) any person who agrees, consents, assumes or purports to
act as, or who is or holds himself out to be, whether
or not pursuant to contractual relationship, as agent
of a foreign principal as defined in clause (1).
[emphasis added]
These definitions show that the "Internal Revenue Service"
operates under the jurisdiction, control, and authority of a
"foreign principal";
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 12 of 18
48. That Affiant has read pertinent IRC sections 7801 and
7802, pursuant to all tax legislation through December 31, 1996;
49. That Affiant knows that these sections of the IRC
describe the powers and duties of the Secretary of the Treasury,
and that the delegated authority from the Secretary of the
Treasury to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue originates in
IRC section 7802, as follows:
There shall be in the Department of the Treasury a
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, who shall be appointed by
the President, by and with the advice and consent of the
Senate. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall have
such duties and powers as may be prescribed by the Secretary
of the Treasury.
[emphasis added]
50. That, contrary to popular opinion which is widespread
and erroneous, IRC section 7802 falls within subtitle F of the
IRC, which subtitle has no legal force or effect because Title
26, as such, has not yet been enacted into positive law; that
the proof of the previous sentence is found in IRC 7851(a)(6)(A),
to wit: "The provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the
day after the date of enactment of this title ...." [emphasis
added]; and that subtitle F contains all of the enforcement
provisions of the IRC, including but not limited to IRC sections
7802 and 7851 as quoted above;
50. That Affiant believes and avers that information He has
obtained from the database known as "LegalTrac" under the key
words "International Monetary Fund", which contains 115 entries
to research, enables a Person of average intelligence quickly to
determine that the "Internal Revenue Service" operates under the
dictum of a foreign principal, as described in Article IX,
Section 3, of the Articles of Agreement of the International
Monetary Fund, which has been given full force and effect in the
United States by the Bretton Woods Agreement Acts, 22 U.S.C.
section 286(h) et seq.;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 13 of 18
51. That Affiant further believes, based on information
obtained from public records, that Executive Order number 9751 of
July 11, 1946, designated the International Monetary Fund as a
public international organization entitled to enjoy certain
privileges and immunities, based on the legal effect that
international organizations shall enjoy the status, immunities,
and privileges granted to international organizations;
52. That Affiant believes and avers that the International
Organizations Immunities Act, Public Law 291, 79th Congress, 59
Statutes at Large, page 669 et seq., approved December 29, 1945,
and 22 U.S.C. sections 288 and 288(f), clearly show that the U.S.
Governorship by the Secretary of the Treasury of the
International Monetary Fund, his position as Secretary of the
Treasury a/k/a Department of the Treasury, and his oversight and
delegation of authority to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
unequivocally demonstrate that any and all agents employed by the
"Internal Revenue Service" are clearly "foreign agents" and, as
such, are required by law to register their status pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 219;
53. That Affiant believes and avers that agents of the
"Internal Revenue Service" do routinely impersonate officers
and/or employees of the United States and do, as such, routinely
violate 18 U.S.C. sections 912 and 913 when they "... demand
money and/or documents, and detain any person or search the
person, building or property of any person ....";
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 14 of 18
54. That Affiant believes, avers, and asserts that foreign
agents of the "Internal Revenue Service" have no jurisdiction or
legal authority to detain, falsely imprison, search, or seize
Persons or property within the 50 several states which are
members of the Union of states called the United States of
America;
55. That, when a government becomes bankrupt, it loses its
sovereignty; that, in the year 1933, the United States declared
bankruptcy, as expressed in President Roosevelt's Executive
Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and 6260, see Senate Report 93-549, pages
187, 594, under the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, codified
at 12 U.S.C. 95, see also House Joint Resolution number 192
(hereinafter "HJR 192"), dated June 5, 1933, confirmed in Perry
v. U.S., 294 U.S. 330-381 (1935), 79 L.Ed. 912, and 31 U.S.C.
5112, 5119;
56. That, in the Perry case, the U.S. Supreme Court stated
that HJR 192 signified that the United States had repudiated,
dishonored, and disavowed its own notes and obligations (i.e.
declared bankruptcy); that the United States has continued ever
since to repudiate, dishonor, and disavow its obligations,
thereby dissolving the lawful governmental structure; that, by
doing so while attempting to bypass the law, they have no remedy
at law, relief in equity, or claim under any body of law
whatsoever; and that, as a bankrupt insolvent entity, the United
States has no standing to sue at law or equity, or to bring any
civil or criminal action against anyone;
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 15 of 18
57. That Congressman Traficant stated to the House of
Representatives on March 17, 1993 that, "Mr. Speaker. We are now
here in Chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees
presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity
in world history, the U.S. Government." See Congressional
Record, March 17, 1993, Volume 33;
58. That Affiant believes and avers, based on many years of
direct and indirect experience with agents of the "Internal
Revenue Service," that his business activities have been
monitored by such foreign agents, and that He has become the
target of their terrorist tactics to silence Him through fear;
and that Affiant has learned that the "Internal Revenue Service"
has disseminated false information to the public concerning its
true status and alleged authority over Sovereign Citizens of the
United States of America, as formed under the Constitution for
the United States of America by our Founding Fathers; and,
through private association with many Persons at times and places
of His choosing, Affiant has been educating others as to the
truth of the matters discussed and documented herein;
59. That Affiant believes and avers that He has become a
target of retaliation, reprisals, and terrorism by foreign agents
of the "Internal Revenue Service" in order to silence Him, in
clear violation of 18 U.S.C. 1513 which prohibits retaliating
against a witness and/or persons possessing "any information
relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense ...", and that this statute contains extraterritorial
Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section;
60. That Affiant believes and avers, to the best of His
current information, knowledge, and belief, that Special Agent
Cardenas, who is employed by the "Department of the Treasury,
Internal Revenue Service," is in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections
241 and 242, in violation of the IRC, and in violation of 22
U.S.C. sections 7214(a)(1) and (7), for making false and
fraudulent statements and representations in order to cause a
SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY to issue upon the "New Life
Health Center Company";
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 16 of 18
61. That Affiant believes and avers, to the best of His
current information, knowledge, and belief, that Special Agent
Cardenas acted with willful disregard, wanton negligence, and
egregious conduct in assisting or otherwise causing said Subpoena
to be issued "on application of the United States of America";
62. That Affiant, over many years, has sustained extreme
loss, and suffered pain and injurious harm as a direct result of
acts committed by agents of the "Internal Revenue Service" in
glaring, blatant disregard and utter contempt for Affiant's
Sovereign Rights, for applicable statutes governing their
conduct, and for other laws, rules, and regulations governing
agents of the "Department of the Treasury" and their police
actions against Sovereign Citizens of the 50 states of the Union;
63. That the U.S. Supreme Court, in the recent case of U.S.
v. Lopez, 115 S.Ct. 1624 (1995), held that, under the Commerce
Clause, the Congress has no general police powers within the 50
states of the Union, to wit: "Indeed, on this crucial point, the
majority and Justice Breyer agree in principle: the Federal
Government has nothing approaching a police power." [emphasis
added]
FURTHER, Affiant sayeth naught.
Executed this __________ day of __________________________, 1996.
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 17 of 18
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Eugene A. Burns
Dr. Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D., Sui Juris
Managing Director
New Life Health Center Company
copies: Sheriff, Pima county
Attorney General, Arizona state
Affidavit of Eugene Arthur, Burns, D.C., N.D.:
Page 18 of 18
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena