Certified U.S. Mail c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-476-653-251 Tucson, Arizona state
Return Receipt Requested zip code exempt
Restricted Delivery Requested June 15, 1996
Ms. Harriet L. Turney
General Counsel
"State Bar of Arizona"
111 West Monroe, Suite 1800
Phoenix, Arizona state
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND
Re: State of Arizona, The Oath of Admission to the Bar
Status of "State Bar of Arizona" under state law
Dear Ms. Turney:
I am doing some research for a client who wishes to present
certified evidence to a federal court of the official wording of
"The Oath of Admission to the Bar" and of the "Lawyer's Creed of
Professionalism of the State Bar of Arizona" which is mentioned
in the former Oath (see attached).
Would you be so kind as to provide us with a certified copy
of said Lawyer's Creed as soon as possible? Because of related
research which we have been doing with other investigators around
the country, we have reason to believe that the Lawyer's Creed is
written so as to override all previous statements, including that
part of The Oath of Admission to the Bar which states that the
affiant "will support the Constitution of the United States and
the Constitution of the State of Arizona." We need confirmation
from the source on this point.
Moreover, we have contacted the Office of the Arizona
Secretary of State, and the "State Bar of Arizona" is not
registered to do business in Arizona. If this is so, then would
you please be so kind as to provide us with correct citations to
the statute(s) and/or constitutional provision(s) which authorize
the "State Bar of Arizona" to issue licenses to practice law in
the State of Arizona? Since your letter will become a matter of
evidence in one or more federal court cases, please certify your
answer under penalty of perjury, so as to render your written
response admissible, pursuant to the appropriate section of 28
U.S.C. 1746 and the Federal Rules of Evidence.
One last thing: we will also need a certified copy of your
license to practice law in the State of Arizona, if you have one.
If we do not hear from you within ten (10) working days, we
will be entitled to proceed on the basis of the conclusive
presumption that the requested documents do not exist, on the
strength of the following authority: "Silence can only be
equated with fraud where there is a legal or a moral duty to
speak, or where an inquiry unanswered would be intentionally
misleading." U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977).
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and Federal Witness
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
attachments: copy of "The Oath of Admission to the Bar"
quotation from Bouvier's Law Dictionary,
1856 edition, defining "Counsellor at Law"
"Esquires," by John E. Trumane, all rights reserved
article by Joyce Rosenwald in re: bar monopolies
copy of Colorado records custodian:
certified evidence of original 13th Amendment
email: supremelawfirm@altavista.net
website: http://supremelaw.com
copies: case files
clients
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena