Sheila Terese, Wallen, Sui Juris
c/o General Delivery
Arivaca [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

In Propria Persona

Under Protest, Necessity, and
by Special Visitation Only






                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                  JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,       )  Case No. 95-484-WDB
                                )
     Plaintiff,                 )  NOTICE OF FORMAL OBJECTION
                                )  TO TRANSCRIPT FEE IMPOSED
     v.                         )
                                )
Sheila Terese, Wallen,          )
                                )
     Defendant.                 )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Sheila Terese,  Wallen, Sui  Juris, Citizen of Arizona

state and  Defendant in  the above  entitled matter  (hereinafter

"Defendant"), formally to object to the $460 fee imposed upon the

Defendant to  obtain a  transcript of  the  evidentiary  hearing,

merely because  She was  proceding In Propria Persona and did not

have Court-appointed  Counsel at  the  time  She  requested  said

transcript.   Defendant was  told by  the Court  transcriber that

there would  have been  no charge  for said  transcript, had  the

Defendant been  represented by  Court-appointed  Counsel.    This

practice is blatantly discriminatory against litigants proceeding

In Propria  Persona and  without Bar  licensed representation, in

direct violation  of the  original Thirteenth Amendment, ratified

in  the   year  1819  when  Virginia  voted  to  amend  the  U.S.


       Notice of Formal Objection to Transcript Fee Imposed:
                          Page 1 of 3


Constitution with  same.   See also Full Faith and Credit Clause;

Haynes v.  Kerner, 404  U.S. 519;   Defendant's NOTICE AND DEMAND

FOR THE  RIGHT TO ENJOY THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL OF CHOICE;  and

Defendant's MEMORANDUM  OF POINTS  AND AUTHORITIES  IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANT'S  CHALLENGE   TO  JURISDICTION   FOR   VIOLATING   THE

FUNDAMENTAL  GUARANTEE   FOR  EFFECTIVE  ASSISTANCE  OF  COUNSEL,

already filed  in the instant case.  Defendant is being penalized

for Her  objections to  ineffective assistance of Counsel and for

exercising Her  fundamental  Right  to  effective  assistance  of

Counsel.   If She  had been  unable to  obtain the  transcript in

question, for  whatever reason,  She would  not  have  been  able

adequately to prepare an effective defense in the instant case.


Executed on July 22, 1996


/s/ Sheila Wallen

Sheila Terese, Wallen, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and
Counselor at Law and federal witness

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


       Notice of Formal Objection to Transcript Fee Imposed:
                          Page 2 of 3


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Sheila  Terese,  Wallen,  Sui  Juris,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without  the United  States, that I am at least 18 years

of age  and a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and

that I personally served the following document:

                   NOTICE OF FORMAL OBJECTION
                    TO TRANSCRIPT FEE IMPOSED

by placing  said document  in first class U.S. Mail, with postage

prepaid and properly addressed to the following individuals:


Office of the United States Attorney  [hand-delivered]
110 South Church Avenue, Suite 8310
Tucson [85701]
ARIZONA STATE

Attorney General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Solicitor General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


Dated:  July 22, 1996


/s/ Sheila Wallen
________________________________________
Sheila Terese, Wallen,
Citizen of Arizona state

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


       Notice of Formal Objection to Transcript Fee Imposed:
                          Page 3 of 3


                             #  #  #
      

Return to Table of Contents for

U.S.A. v. Wallen