HEAR YE! YEAR YE! HEAR YE!
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FROM ALL QUALIFIED ARTICLE III
FEDERAL JUDGES
This is a general public request for proposals from all
individuals who are qualified, interested, and available to
preside as an Article III Judge on the bench of the District
Court of the United States in Tucson, Arizona state. This is an
Article III district court, pursuant to the holding of the U.S.
Supreme Court in the case of Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298,
312, 42 S.Ct. 343, 66 L.Ed 627 (1921).
Pursuant to the holding in Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920),
your proposals must confirm, under penalty of perjury, that your
compensation is currently not being diminished by any federal or
state income taxes, unless you have chosen knowingly,
intentionally, and voluntarily to contribute a portion of your
compensation to the state and/or federal governments, without any
threat, duress, or coercion.
Pursuant to 31 U.S.C., the "Internal Revenue Service" is not an
agency or bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury.
See Chapter 3, Subchapter I, Organization. Voluntary
contributions to the "Internal Revenue Service" shall be grounds
for disqualification, because of the danger of undue outside
influences as described in the case of Lord v. Kelley, 240
F.Supp. 167, 169 (1965). Plaintiff therefore reserves the Right
to recuse any judge who currently has any contract, or has filed
any tax returns, with the "Internal Revenue Service" or with any
of its agencies, assigns, instrumentalities, or principals.
If you have so chosen to contribute a portion of your
compensation to the state and/or federal governments, please
affirm, under penalty of perjury, that this is the case. The
Plaintiff, who desires a qualified and competent Article III
federal judge, reserves the fundamental Right, under Article III,
Section 1, to a judge whose compensation for the office of
federal judge has not been diminished during his/her Continuance
in office. See Constitution for the United States of America, as
lawfully amended, Article III, Section 1.
Please submit your proposals, with accompanying affidavit, to
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, Supreme Court of the United
States, One First Street Northeast, Washington, District of
Columbia. Please use first class or priority United States mail,
Attention: Clerk of Court. Please do not call either the Chief
Justice, or the Clerk of the Supreme Court, concerning this
matter.
Please submit a courtesy copy of your proposal to Judge Alex
Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, 125 South Grand Avenue,
Suite 200, Pasadena, California state. Please also do not call
Judge Kozinski's office either concerning this matter.
Please also submit a courtesy copy of your proposal to Paul
Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Counselor at Law and federal
witness, c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson [zip code exempt],
ARIZONA REPUBLIC.
All proposals must be on 8.5 x 11 inch white paper, and be signed
in original with blue ink, and verified pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1746.
It would assist the Plaintiff very much if you were to forward
this request for proposals to as many different email lists as
possible. We are utilizing the Internet exclusively, in order to
expedite the dissemination of this request. Hard copies of this
request for proposals have already been mailed to Chief Justice
Rehnquist, and to Judge Alex Kozinski, for their information.
Thank you very much for your consideration. Questions about this
request for proposals should be directed to email address:
pmitch@primenet.com, attention: Mr. Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A.,
M.S., Counselor at Law and federal witness. See 18 U.S.C. 1513.
All communication must be in writing, and will be kept strictly
confidential, as much as possible. Public disclosures of
candidate proposals will happen only under lawful court order(s),
or with the prior written consent of the candidate.
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
August 31, 1996
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
U.S.A. v. Wallen