Freedom Law School, not being even as
legitimate as most beauty colleges, heavily
markets a collection of "Freedom Packages"
designed to ensure that you'll never have to pay
taxes again. Their Royal Freedom Package ("For
those who wish to live free And be treated like
royalty!") offers a collection of the same books
and tapes that many tax protestors have relied
upon right up to time of their sentencing
hearings. The package also purports to fund your
defense against the IRS or any other
administrative authorities, presumably by the
"Freedom Law Dream Team" (Peymon, plus Dave
Wellington, Ed Bruning, Dr. Robert Clearkson,
and Paul Ballmer -- none of whom are practicing
attorneys, just by the way). You get all this
for a mere $6,000 up front and $2,000 per year
-- pretty pricey when you consider that most of
Freedom Law School's clientele are tax
protestors working cash jobs cleaning windows or
chopping firewood.
But wait! For those
who don't want or can't afford the Royal
Treatment, Freedom Law School offers a "Simple
Freedom Package" for only $4,000 and $700 per
year, that basically gives you everything that
the Royal Freedom Package does (i.e., nothing of
value), BUT which also claims to "educate the
said public servants" so that presumably they
will see the light and not pursue you. Good
idea.
A unique aspect of Peymon's scam is
that he alludes to connections with other tax
scam artists who wouldn't give him the time of
day. Fellow tax scam artist and Quatlooser Devvy
Kidd wrote an article blasting Peymon and Freedom Law
School for falsely claiming that she and Bob
Schultz would speak at his 2001 "Freedom Rally".
According to Devvy, "This is very disturbing and
in my opinion, out and out fraud. Peymon has
been selling tickets to an event when he's known
weeks in advance that two of the 'hot' names he
has listed as key note speakers on the front
page of his expensive color brochure, had both
declined the invitation. Knowing that neither
Bob Schulz nor Roscoe Bartlett would appear at
his event, he still put out the brochure through
a mass postal service mailing (10,000 copies)
and has it posted on his web site."
Even
Devvy now warns about
Peymon:
Fellow tax scam artist and Quatlooser Bill
Conklin has this to say about Peymon:
"Number Two in the Weasel Hall of Shame is
Peymon Mottahedeh of Freedom Law School, which I
have renamed Scams R Us. This man is especially
dangerous because he is very charismatic when he
speaks. But Peymon Mottahedeh is a WEASEL of the
first order. Stay away from him. He ranks right
up there -- er, I mean 'down there' -- with
Judge Rizzo." Conklin goes so far as to suggest
for people to file a complaint with the
California Bar Association against Peymon and
his bogus "Freedom Law School" and even provides
the complaint form! See http://www.anti-irs.com/hall_of_shame.htm
Notwithstanding this endorsement, Freedom Law
School sells Conklin's book "Why No One Is
Required to File Tax Returns" online. Go
figure.
Of course, when we say that
Peymon and Freedom Law School sell any of this
stuff we really mean it -- cash, check or money
orders only. Their order form humorously
explains: " Send check or money order with the
'pay to' line left BLANK, or preferably, send
CASH. Please see the U.S. Supreme Court ruling
on page 26 of why we MUST use CASH to protect
your's and our privacy." Page 26 of what? Must
be the federal tax liens that Devvy claims to
have the records of that Peymon is unable to
discharge. Oh well -- we're only amazed that
they don't suggest to any sucker who would buy
their stuff that they leave the amount blank too
because of the "U.S. Supreme Court ruling on
page 26". Probably, Peymon just never thought of
this.
Thurston Bell says Freedom Law
School are Scam Artists
from http://www.nite.org/docs/academic-deficiency.htm
Notice of Academic
Deficiency
5.12.2001
There just seems to be an endless number
of people out here on the internet, who, without
credentials, positive accomplishments, or
evidence of prior experience or knowledge of
their work on the Internet, and who also believe
that they have some argument "worthy" of hearing
by the federal courts, will ask that YOU send
them some money. There are in fact SO MANY of
these people, that I could spend every day for
the rest of my life arguing against and exposing
them. This will do nothing but serve the wishes
of the Treasury Department.
I have to learn to trust that individuals
can be responsible for themselves, can show
prudence, and judge that which is sent to them
over the World Wide Web.
When it comes to IRS lawsuits, I can only
share a few points of certainty regarding the
issues of lawsuits.
A: The Federal Courts do NOT want to rule
in YOUR favor because;
B: No Federal Judge wants to be the
Federal Judge who collapses the House of Cards
known as the Economic Stabilization
Program.
C: The Government and the Judge will use
Rule 12(b)(6) to throw your case out at the drop
of a hat. That rule is: Failure to state a claim
for which relief can be granted.
D: The Courts and the Government will
look for the weakest point of your argument and
they will rule on that one and ignore the rest
of the issues.
So, if someone is sending an e-mail
regarding wanting money from you to help support
a case where there is no specifically damaged
plaintiff and there are multiple arguments, I
will not respond to such e-mails.
If you are seriously considering
spreading news of or financially supporting the
ideas of such people who have discovered the
Internet as a means of conning people out of
money, instead of sending me their e-mail please
write back to them and ask them what their
credentials are, what results have they had,
what is their area of expertise and experience,
and do they have references from anyone that you
might hold in esteem.
This how the Establishments of Academia
control discussions and discourse. (References
are important.) And believe me folks, if someone
out there was doing something that you needed to
know about, I would have told you already. And
if they don't have the guts to come to me
directly and seek counsel with people like me
who have results, they certainly are NOT worth
your time and effort.
Thurston P. Bell
Founder
PLEASE NOTE:
NITE has VERY strict standards about
following the letter of the Law. The people and
organizations listed below use arguments that
the courts have already deemed frivolous, and
make all sorts of claims with no results to show
for themselves. While some have truth mixed in
with lies, there is just enough truth to get
people tangled into their web. Some of these
people are academic plagiarists who have been
using NITE's work product and claiming it as
their own and / or intermingling our argument
with frivolous res judicata patriot arguments.
Many of these people / organizations are
networked (i.e. working together). A few of them
are SHAM trust salesmen / women. Therefore, we
can truthfully say that from our experience and
first hand knowledge, the following people are
"Snake Oil" peddlers and / or CON-men/women who
do not deserve your trust:
Al Adask;
Al Beyer;
Al
Thompson;
American Rights
Litigators;
American Tax
Consultants;
Barry Konicov;
Big
Al;
Bill Benson;
Bill "William"
Conklin;
Bill Drexler;
Bob Schulz;
Brad
Barnhill;
Bruce Hatcher;
Chad
Prater;
Christopher H. Hansen;
Christopher
M. Hansen;
Dale Livingston;
Dan Meador;
Dave Bosset;
Dave Champion;
Dennis
MacPhaeddon ;
Devvy Kidd;
Dick
Simkanin;
Don Proctor;
Ed
Akehurst;
Eddie Kahn;
Ed "Eduardo"
Rivera;
Edmund Fitzsimmons;
Erwin Rommel
School of Law;
Fairtax;
Financial
Fortress;
Financial Prosperity;
Freedom
Above Fortune;
Freedom
Hall;
Freedom Law
School;
Free Enterprise
Society;
Gordon Phillips;
Howard
Freeman;
Inform America;
Institute of
Global Prosperity;
IRS
Decoder;
Inhabitant;
Irwin Schiff;
Jeff
Dickstein;
Jack Cohen;
Jim Deal;
John
Feld;
John Gliha;
John Hecht;
John B.
Kotmair;
Joseph Banister;
Joy Foundation;
Justin Garriott;
Ken "The Hornet"
Hunter;
Lamar Hardy, Hawaii;
Larry
"Lowell" Becraft;
Law Research
Registry;
Les Hollingshead;
Lynda
Wahl;
Lynn Meridith;
Marcia Doerr;
Mel
Stamper;
Pat Patton;
Paul Andrew
Mitchell;
Paul Lienthall;
PreferredServices;
Richard
Cornforth;
Richard Standring;
Right Way
Law;
Save-A-Patriot Fellowship (SAPF);
Sean O'Hara;
Solutions Group;
Steve
DeLuca (S.T. Fitzgerald, Thomas Luca, other
alisases)
Steven Swan;
Steven
Beresford;
Supreme Law Firm;
Tax
Ax;
Taxgate.com (NOT Tax-Gate.com);
Tax
Statement;
The Informer;
Tom
Scambos;
Tom Smith (Alleged
Doctor);
Treasury Tax Secrets;
Virginia
Cropsey a/k/a Little Red Hen
Wallace
Institute ( A Disgrace to William Wallace and
Clan Wallace);
Wayne C. Bentson
"We The
People Foundation"
Review Pending
Paul Sulla,
Attorney
People who do not seem to understand
have not seen as many people as Mr. Bell has
seen, get hurt. They lose their property, jobs,
paychecks, and / or families. They obviously do
not have the discernment to understand how
vitally important this issue is, and how we MUST
stay on point or lose.
There is no room for those who claim it
is their 1st Amendment Right for supporting
people who are espousing such res judicata
arguments. The courts and the Kotmair case made
it clear. Guilt by association is NOW supported
by CASE LAW.
