c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA REPUBLIC
November 30, 1997
Mr. Richard Matsch
United States District Court
Federal Building
Denver, Colorado state
Subject: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
Dear Mr. Matsch:
I am finally going to break my self-imposed silence on one of the
most heinous acts of terrorism this nation has ever experienced.
I believe that you, sir, are a traitor, and I am quite willing
and able to prove it. I do so, herein. Read on.
In my several years of specializing in federal law, you can
imagine my shock one day, when I discovered how easy it had
become to rip any federal indictment into manifold shreds of
paper, without even reading to the second page.
Beginning at the top, we usually find one or more U.S. ATTORNeys
listed as having power(s) of ATTORNey to represent the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA (spelled in CAPITAL LETTERS, per force). But,
Title 28 of the U.S. Code does not authorize U.S. ATTORNeys to
represent the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, but only the United
States. Count one: misrepresentation.
To "ATTORN" is to supervise the transfer of an estate from the
old lord to the new lord; it is a term from feudal law. Isn't
it interesting how closely the terms "feudal" and "federal" do
sound, when juxtaposed right next to each other? The long chain
of coincidences does not stop here. Keep reading!
Further on down the first page of any federal indictment, we then
find that all criminal prosecutions are commenced in the United
States District Court ("USDC"). Unfortunately, the USDC has no
criminal jurisdiction whatsoever. This has now been proven by
the utter and demonstrable silence by the Department of Justice
to several Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests for the
statute(s), if any, which grant the USDC original jurisdiction
over criminal prosecutions. There is none. Count two:
deprivation of due process.
Reaching the so-called real parties of interest now, these bogus
criminal actions [sic] invariably show the UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA as the moving Party, but the Congress of the United
States has never granted legal standing to the UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA to sue, or be sued, in the USDC. It is true that the
United States has been granted standing to sue, or be sued, in
the USDC, but the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the United States
[sic], are not one and the same. This you should have learned
way back in law school but, alas, they did not teach these things
in law schools way back when you were a student; they still
don't teach these things in law schools. Count three: fraud.
The names of criminal defendants are likewise always spelled in
ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, which has now been nailed for invoking a
subtle, unconstitutional, yes, even criminal subterfuge whereby
martial rule is impressed upon the People of America, in blatant
violation of the prohibition against treason. Evidently, I need
to remind you that one of the penalties for treason is death.
But, you already know these things, correct? Count four:
treason (a capital offense).
Very rarely, however, do litigants think to challenge the
legality of the body which issued these bogus indictments in the
first place. You probably do not know how many times this has
already been done -- properly, timely, lawfully, and correctly --
because an active conspiracy is afoot, within the Department of
Just US, to obstruct any and all pleadings which nail the federal
Jury Selection and Service Act for blatant, unconstitutional
discrimination against Citizens of the several states. Quite
simply, those who are qualified to make law in America are,
nevertheless, prevented from serving on grand and petit juries,
or from voting in general elections. Those who can serve on
grand and petit juries, or vote in general elections, are
prevented by Law from serving in any federal elected offices.
Doesn't this strike you as strange? Count five: conspiracy.
All federal judges are also paying income taxes on their judicial
compensation, in blatant violation of the prohibition against
same which is found in Article III. This prohibition was upheld
in the magnificent opinion of the Supreme Court in Evans v. Gore
in 1920. Lately, however, our august Chief Justice has
confirmed, in front of a graduate class in the Law School of the
University of Arizona, that "there has been a change in
doctrine." But, in a rare moment of sanity, one of your own
colleagues proved, in Lord v. Kelley, that the IRS exerts undue
influence on every judge who is also a taxpayer. Go figure!
Count six: extortion (NOT a change in doctrine!)
Delving even deeper into this putrid swamp of self-serving
traitors, we find that the IRS is also bribing federal
prosecutors to the tune of $25,000 for each indictment which they
obtain from federal grand juries, against the President's
political enemies. Would you have us believe that federal judges
have remained completely above this criminal practice? Perhaps
you do need to be reminded here, lest you conveniently forget,
that Congress abolished the Performance Management and
Recognition System in 1993, whereas the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986
remains on the books (see Title 41, U.S.C., sections 51 et seq.).
When was the last time you completed the financial disclosure
which is required of you by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978?
Count seven: bribery.
And now, we get to the meat of this matter. Your efforts to
prevent the truth from emerging in these various show trials are
now becoming too painfully obvious, even to less educated
Americans. General Partin, a demolition expert in the Pentagon,
has already proven that the structural columns in the Murrah
building were severed, most likely by plastic explosives which
were drilled into the bearing columns, and then exploded with
pressure-sensitive detonators. That famous bullshit bomb of
which you are so fond, did its job quite well -- the shock wave
triggered the deaths of numerous innocent children, not to
mention all the adults who lost their lives as well. What a
coincidence that ATF personnel were conveniently gone on that
terrible day, at that precise moment!
Isn't it a shame, that you too were not in the Murrah building at
that precise moment, so that you could now provide us with an
exacting eyewitness account of how explosive bullshit has become
in America.
Bullshit, Matsch. You're no match for it, and it's all over your
face, leaving permanent stains on your eyes, ears, nose and
throat. The other stains -- the ones on your soul -- will remain
there, forever indelible, forever yours.
Irreverently submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
Counselor at Law, and Private Attorney General
copy: the Internet
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Letters of Correspondence