---------- Forwarded message
---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:19 PM
Subject: PARTIAL OBJECTIONS to DOJ's PAST DUE reply to: FOIA Request
FOIA-2024-01773
To: Douglas R. Hibbard, Chief, Initial Request Staff c/o <DOJ.OIP.FOIA@usdoj.gov>
Cc: Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
REPORTING OBJECTIONS AND
PROBABLE CAUSE: 18 U.S.C. 4
(Misprision of felony)
Greetings Douglas R. Hibbard,
Chief, Initial Request Staff:
Thank you for your email reply
to our PAST DUE FOIA Request
for all 4 credentials required
of all 9 x S.Ct. Justices
(total of 36 discrete
credentials).
Please understand that
additional time will be needed
to scan and to incorporate all
pages of your Reply
into the archives of The
Credential Investigation here:
Meanwhile, we are responding
with a partial list of OBJECTIONS
to OIP's PAST DUE reply to our most recent FOIA
Request,
for reasons including but not
limited to the following
(1) U.S. DOJ is the legal
custodian of PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS,
designated as such by the Act of
Congress at 5 U.S.C. 2902(c);
your reply errs by
misrepresenting that law and falsely claiming:
"DOJ is not the official repository":
(2) the Court (Clerk) is
the legal custodian of APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS,
designated as such by the Act of
Congress at 5 U.S.C. 2906;
your reply errs by
misrepresenting that law and falsely claiming:
"AOUSC maintains personnel files of all federal judges":
(3) furthermore, that
AOUSC was served several years ago
with a PROPER SUBPOENA IN A
CIVIL CASE, and
not even one (1) credential was
disclosed by that AOUSC:
(4) on the merits,
applicable Federal laws require four (4)
discrete credentials for all
Federal Judges and Justices:
9 x 4 =
36 discrete credentials should have been disclosed;
(5) your cover letter and
.pdf attachments only disclosed
thirteen (13) discrete
credentials, and some of the OATHS
were duplicated i.e.
administered by 2 different S.Ct. personnel;
(6) for Neil M. Gorsuch, 2
x OATHS and 1 x APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
were disclosed;
no SENATE CONFIRMATION was
disclosed;
no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION was
disclosed;
Gorsuch's APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
are a known COUNTERFEIT credential
(e.g. no OMB control
number etc.)
(7) for Elena Kagan, 1 x
OATH and 1 x APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
were disclosed;
no SENATE CONFIRMATION was
disclosed;
no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION was
disclosed;
Kagan's APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
are a known COUNTERFEIT credential
(e.g. no OMB control
number etc.)
(8) for Brett M.
Kavanaugh, 2 x OATHS and 1 x APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
were disclosed;
no SENATE CONFIRMATION was
disclosed;
no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION was
disclosed;
Kavanaugh's APPOINTMENT
AFFIDAVITS are a known COUNTERFEIT
credential
(e.g. no OMB control
number etc.)
(9) for Ketanji Brown Jackson, 2 x OATHS and 1 x APPOINTMENT
AFFIDAVITS
were disclosed;
no SENATE CONFIRMATION was
disclosed;
no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION was
disclosed;
Jackson's APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
are a known COUNTERFEIT credential
(e.g. no OMB control number
etc.)
(10) for Sonia Sotomayor,
1 x OATH and 1 x APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
were disclosed;
no SENATE CONFIRMATION was
disclosed;
no PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION was
disclosed;
Sotomayor's APPOINTMENT
AFFIDAVITS are a known COUNTERFEIT
credential
(e.g. no OMB control
number etc.)
(11) for John G. Roberts,
Jr., no credentials were disclosed whatsoever;
(12) for Clarence Thomas,
no credentials were disclosed whatsoever;
(13) for Samuel A. Alito,
Jr., no credentials were disclosed whatsoever;
(14) for Amy Coney
Barrett, no credentials were disclosed whatsoever;
In the absence of any further
supplements, the latter due diligence fully supports
our legal conclusion that there
is presently no legal quorum at the U.S. Supreme Court
as required by the Act of
Congress at 28 U.S.C. 1.
If you need more time to find
and forward all of the missing credentials,
please give us a reasonable
estimate of the extra time you will need to do so.
The legal significance of so
many missing and/or defective credentials
should be self-evident to all
personnel presently employed by the
U.S. Department of Justice e.g.
see the maxim "ignorance of the law
is no excuse for violating the
law".
Absent more credentials, we have
every reason to lodge a proper and timely
VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON
INFORMATION,
formally charging the named
suspects with multiple FELONY Federal offenses.
See e.g. 18 U.S.C. 912
(impersonating an officer of the United States).
We proceed on the basis of the
Act of Congress at 18 U.S.C. 4,
which creates a legal obligation
to report same to an officer
in the civil or military
authority of the United States (Federal Government).
Thank you for your continuing
professional consideration in this matter.
Cc: President Donald J.
Trump
Attachment: DOJ/OIP FOIA
response dated April 29, 2024
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (Retired
/ pro bono)
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui
Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act:
31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
Attached
is correspondence from the Department of Justice’s Office of Information
Policy, which is associated with the above-referenced Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request.
Please
do not reply to this e-mail, as this account is not monitored.
Thank
you,
-----------------------------------------
Initial
Request Staff
Office
of Information Policy
U.S.
Department of Justice
202-514-3642
(Main Line)
202-514-1009
(Fax)
--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the
United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil
False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
