Time: Fri Jun 20 09:49:34 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA07724;
Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:45:36 -0700 (MST)
by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA21878;
Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:45:23 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:43:53 -0700
To: Charles Petras <cpetras@stratos.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Reconstruction Amendments' Debates
Many thanks, Charles.
I took the liberty of forwarding this
excellent post to all clients of the
Supreme Law School.
I am sure they will value it greatly.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
At 10:43 AM 6/20/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Paul,
>
>I thought you might be interested in the following list of recommended
>reading.
>
> Graham, The "Conspiracy Theory" of the Fourteenth Amendment,
> 47 Yale Law Journal 371, 48 Yale L. J. 171 (1938)
>
>=====
> Reconstruction Amendments'
> Debates
>
> THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND CONTEMPORARY DEBATES
> IN CONGRESS ON
> THE 13TH, 14TH, AND 15TH AMENDMENTS
>
> Published by the Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government
>
> Editor--Alfred Avins, J. S. D., Ph.D.
> (Cantab.) Professor of Law, Memphis State University
>
> ------
>
> Copyright (C) 1967
> by
> Virginia Commission on Constitutional Government
>
> ------
>
> SUPPLEMENT TO
> THE RECONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS' DEBATES
>
> (For Use With the Hardcover Edition)
>
> Reader's Guide
>
> ------
>
> Recommended Reading
>
>Avins, Literacy Tests and the Fourteenth Amendment: the Con temporary
>Understanding, 30 Albany Law Review 229 (1966)
>
>Avins, Fourteenth Amendment Limitations on Banning Racial and Religious
>Discrimination, 8 Arizona Law Review (1967), Hearings before the
>Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Senate Judiciary Committee, on
>S. 3296 et al. (Civil Rights), 89th Cong., 2d Sess. 805 (June 6 through 28,
>1966) (hereinafter called Civil Rights Hearings)
>
>Avins, The Civil Rights Act of 1875: Some Reflected Light on the Fourteenth
>Amendment and Public Accommodations, 66 Columbia Law Review 873 (1966),
>Civil Rights Hearings, p. 711.
>
>Avins, Freedom of Choice in Personal Service Occupations: Thir teenth
>Amendment Limitations on Antidiscrimination Legislation, 49 Cornell Law
>Quarterly 228 (1964)
>
>Avins, Social Equality and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Original
>Understanding, 4 Houston Law Review (1967)
>
>Avins, Involuntary Servitude in British Commonwealth Law, 16 International
>and Comparative Law Quarterly 29 (England, 1967)
>
>Avins, The Right to Hold Public Office and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth
>Amendments: the Original Understanding, 15 Kansas Law Review 287 (1967), 18
>Mercer Law Review (1967)
>
>Avins, The Right to Work and the Fourteenth Amendment: the Original
>Understanding, 18 Labor Law Journal 15 (1967) Avins, State Action and the
>Fourteenth Amendment, 17 Mercer Law Review 352 (1966)
>
>Avins, De Facto and De Jure School Segregation: Some Reflected Light on the
>Fourteenth Amendment from the Civil Rights Act of 1875, 38 Mississippi Law
>Journal (1967), Civil Rights Hearings, p. 642.
>
>Avins, The Right to Be a Witness and the Fourteenth Amendment, 31 Missouri
>Law Review 471 (1966)
>
>Avins, The Equal Protection of the Laws: the Original Under standing, 12
>New York Law Forum (1967)
>
>Avins, The Right to Bring Suit Under the Fourteenth Amendment: the Original
>Understanding, 20 Oklahoma Law Review (1967)
>
>Avins, The Civil Rights Act of 1866, the Civil Rights Bill of 1966, and the
>Right to Buy Property, 40 Southern California Law Review (1967)
>
>Avins, The Fifteenth Amendment and Literacy Tests: the Original Intent, 18
>Stanford Law Review 808 (1966)
>
>Avins, Freedom of Choice in Personal Service Occupations Revisited, 18
>Syracuse Law Review (1967)
>
>Avins, The Civil Rights Act of 1875 and The Civil Rights Cases Revisited:
>State Action, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Housing, 14 U.C.L.A. Law Review
>5 (1966), Civil Rights Hearings, p. 1789.
>
>Avins, The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871: Some Reflected Light on State Action
>and the Fourteenth Amendment, 1967 Utah Law Review, Civil Rights Hearings,
>p. 772.
>
>Avins, Anti-Miscegenation Laws and the Fourteenth Amendment: the Original
>Intent, 52 Virginia Law Review 1224 (1966)
>
>Avins, Literacy Tests, the Fourteenth Amendment, and District of Columbia
>Voting: the Original Intent, 1965 Washington University Law Quarterly 429.
>
>Avins, Racial Segregation in Public Accommodations: Some Reflected Light on
>the Fourteenth Amendment from the Civil Rights Act of 1875, 18 Western
>Reserve Law Review (1967), Civil Rights Hearings, p. 680.
>
>Avins, The Fourteenth Amendment and Jury Discrimination: the Original
>Understanding, Civil Rights Hearings, p. 615.
>
>Avins, Federal Power to Punish Individual Crimes Under the Fourteenth
>Amendment: the Original Understanding, Civil Rights Hearings, p. 754.
>
>Bickel, The Original Understanding and the Segregation Decision, 69 Harvard
>Law Review 1 (1955)
>
>Boudin, Truth and Fiction About the Fourteenth Amendment, 16 New York
>University Law Quarterly 19 (1938)
>
>Corbin, The Doctrine of Due Process of Law Before the Civil War, 24 Harvard
>Law Review 365 (1911)
>
>Crosskey, Charles Fairman, "Legislative History," and the Constitutional
>Limitations on State Authority, 22 University of Chicago Law Review 1 (1954)
>
>Fairman, A Reply to Professor Crosskey, 22 University of Chicago Law Review
>144 (1954)
>
>Fairman, Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights? The
>Original Understanding, 2 Stanford Law Review 5 (1949)
>
>Gillette, THE RIGHT TO VOTE: POLITICS AND THE PASSAGE OF THE FIFTEENTH
>AMENDMENT (1965)
>
>Graham, The Early Antislavery Backgrounds of the Fourteenth Amendment, 1950
>Wisconsin Law Review 479, 610.
>
>Graham, The "Conspiracy Theory" of the Fourteenth Amendment, 47 Yale Law
>Journal 371, 48 Yale L. J. 171 (1938)
>
>Howe, The Meaning of "Due Process of Law" Prior to the Adoption of the
>Fourteenth Amendment, 18 California Law Review 583 (1930)
>
>James, THE FRAMING OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT (1956)
>
>Kelly, The Congressional Controversy Over School Segregation, 1867- 1875,
>64 American Historical Review 537 (1959)
>
>Kendrick, JOURNAL OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE OF FIFTEEN ON RECONSTRUCTION (1914)
>
>Mathews, Legislative and Judicial History of the Fifteenth Amendment, 27
>Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science 305
>(1909)
>
>Pittman, The Fourteenth Amendment: Its Intended Effect on Anti-
>Miscegenation Laws, 43 North Carolina Law Review 92 (1964)
>
>Tansill, Avins, Crutchfield and Colegrove, The Fourteenth Amendment and
>Real Property Rights, in OPEN OCCUPANCY vs. FORCED HOUSING UNDER THE
>FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 68 (Avins ed. 1963), Civil Rights Hearings, p. 699.
>
>Van Alstyne, The Fourteenth Amendment, The "Right" to Vote, and the
>Understanding of the Thirty-Ninth Congress, 1965 Supreme Court Review 33,
>38-68.
>
> ###
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail