Time: Sun Apr 20 12:14:30 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA10403
	for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 11:05:33 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To: liberty-and-justice-outgoing@majordomo.pobox.com
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 12:10:47 -0700
To: <fwolist@sportsmen.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: L&J: SLS: IRC is "Void for Vagueness"

And now we have elevated this debate 
one step higher:


Some are convinced it is void for vagueness.

Some are convinced it is NOT void for vagueness.

I mean, REALLY CONVINCED!  You know, like:

          C-O-N-vinced


Will the real "void for vagueness" please stand up!  

Laughing all the way to my reward!!


/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com

<snip>

>>>
>>>How do you expect to enforce the void for vagueness against the IRC?
>>>
>>>"The Federal Zone"  By whom and is this book still in print?
>>>
>>>Conservatively yours April 1997 my 2c from the Sovereign State of
California,
>>>Carl William Spitzer IV   All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
>>>Long live the legacy of the Great Ronald Reagan
>>>Pray for Bill and Gore - Psalm 109:8-9
>>>They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
>>>deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
>>
>>Wangrud:
>>I don't think the IRC is void for vagueness, I understand it. 
>>I believe its void because it extends the LAW-Martial power. 
>>See Martial-LAW rule by Robert Wangrud  
>
>Paul Milne's interpretation of the IRC found at 
>http://members.tripod.com/~fedinfo/tax_page.html
>indicates that he doesn't think it's void for vagueness
>either. Paul hasn't left a rock unturned in his offering,
>for those who are interested.
>
>Sam Jarvis
>
<snip>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>

      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail