|
THE
TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren .
Last updated Dec 25 2004 The Web pages
below have been backed up. If any links are dead, the backed up page can
be mailed on request. Some of the links below duplicate information. The
duplicates are included as insurance against a single source link
disappearing. SECTION
1. THE GOVT DELIBERATELY LET IT HAPPEN. 1.1
AIRFORCE STANDOWN If
one accepts the official story
about how the hijackings occurred
, then the air force would have to have been stood down in order to ensure the
success of the attacks , as the following research articles conclusively
demonstrate. It
has become popular mythology in the media that fighter jets were
scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. This is not true . 1.1.1 Guilty For 9-11:Part
1. Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, by Illarion Bykov and Jared 1.1.2 Guilty for 9/11 Mr. Cheney's
Cover up -- Part 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm
1.1.4 Frequently asked questions on
9/11 Planes "did scramble " on
9/11,they just " arrived late " http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm 1.1.5 Scrambled Messages, by George
Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001 1.1.6 Russian Air Force chief says
official 9/11 story impossible http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm Scrambling
of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine procedure.
Here's
an example of how routine it is. 1.1.7 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov.
Plane. Netscape news. May 15 2003. http://newsmine.org/archive/9-11/norad-faa-response/jeb-bush-plane-intercepted.txt The
procedures were already in place before Sept 11 2001. They
were implememnted 67 times in the 10 months between September 2000 and
June 2001. (Items 1.1.9 to 1.1.11 are
alternative sources for the same story) 1.1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to
prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml 1.1.10 ABC News Jets on high Alert.
Aug 13 2002. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html 1.1. 11 Military now notified
immediately of unusual air traffic events. Aug 12 2002 http://www.wanttoknow.info/020812ap
I
have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race
tracks. 1.
2 The complicit behaviour of George W. Bush An
examination of the movements of George W. Bush on the morning of Sept 11, and
the subsequent lies told by Bush, the govt and the media to try to cover up his
movements demonstrates that Bush had prior knowledge of the attacks , pretended
to know less than he did once they began, and conspired to ensure that nothing
was done to minimize or prevent them.
1.2.1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3:
Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel. This
is not the only lie which has been told about his movements that morning. See
how many times the story has changed. 1.2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of
US collusion by Steve Grey. http://hamilton.indymedia.org/newswire/display/922/index.php (Read the
section called "A tangle of lies") 1.2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies
Part 1. A strange press conference. By Jared Israel and Francisco
Gil-White Sept 25 2002. http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm 1.2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11
Lies, Part 2: http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm Bush
claims to have seen the 1st WTC impact live on TV while at Booker school
and to have thought at the time that it was an accident. We know that this
is a lie - a) because he hadn't yet arrived at the school when it happened.
b) because the first impact was not broadcast live. No footage of it was shown
live. 1.2:5 The President as Incompetent
Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm Why
did the President - after being told "America is under attack" continue to
listen to schoolchildren reading for another 20- 25 minutes ? Why was he
cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at least one more
hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV footage which proves
treason at the top level. 1.2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm Clinton
was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying about where he was, what
he was doing and what he knew during the crucial period between 8.45 and 9.45
A.M. on Sept 11. 1.3
OTHER EVIDENCE OF GOVT FOREKNOWLEDGE In
the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported on US TV
networks that investigators were already looking into huge volumes of
insider trading on airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
Investigative and regulatory authorities could easily find out who placed these
trades, apparently attempting to profit from
foreknowledge. Why
has this story since completely disappeared? More than two
years later, we see no sign of any inquiry. If the executive
director of the CIA had previously managed the firm which handled much of the
trade, are we expected to believe that authorities can't find out who was
responsible? Clearly, they don't want to know - or at least ,don't want us to
know. Was
an urban rescue team sent to New York the night before
the 1.3:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm Attorney
General, John Ashcroft was warned in July 2001 not to fly commercial
anymore. Ashcroft flying high. CBS News
July 26 2001. 1.3.4 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml Willie
Brown got low-key early warning about air travel. San Francisco Chronicle Sept
12 2001 1.3.5 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/12/MN229389.DTL National
Security Advisor Rice and Whitehouse spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that
nobody had ever conceived of planes being used in this manner. Their statements
are in this article, Bush Was Warned of Hijackings
Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16
2002 1.3.6 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html when
the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in article 1.2.1 demonstrates
that the potential problem had been recognized for
decades. And
there are other examples of this possibility having been widely recognized prior
to Sept 11. 1.3.7 "Omens of terror." by David
Wise Oct 7 2001 http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm In
article 1.3.6 Rice also lied in saying that any threat had
been overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas. The statement she
made is in this press briefing. 1.3.8 Press Briefing by National
Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html But
this is the truth about the memo to which she refers. 1.3.9 August memo focused on
attacks in the U.S. by Bob Woodward and Dan Eggen.Washington Post staff writers.
May 18 2002. page A01. 1.3.9 Former top German Cabinet
Minister rejects official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas von
Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html 1.4:
THE COVER UP In
spite of the magnitude of the attacks, and the fact that even the official story
recognizes catastrophic failures of intelligence, while trying to gloss over the
similarly catastrophic failures of standard airline security and air defence
procedures, the White House has fought tooth and nail against any
serious inquiry into Sept 11. Even the watered down inquiries which have taken
place so far have been bitterly opposed by the White House and only conceded due
to tremendous public pressure. They have been almost completely restricted
to the issue of "intelligence failures" prior to the attacks, leaving the
glaring issues of the air force stand down, and Bush's complicity and
subsequent lies, as well as the insider
trading unaddressed. Bush asks Daschle to limit
Sept. 11 probes CNN Jan 29 2002. 1.4.1 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/ Bush,GOP blast calls for 9/11
inquiry. CNN May 17 2002 1.4.2 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators/ Daschle: Bush,
Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26
2002 Bush
and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation By Mike Hersh Oct 24,
2002, 2:22pm 1.4.4 http://www.mikehersh.com/Bush_and_Cheney_Block_911_Investigation_.shtml Bush Was Warned of Hijackings
Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16
2002 1.3:6 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html 1.4.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query
panel. CBS News. May 23 2002. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml 1.4.6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers
told Bush. White House retreats on independent probe.
Dana Priest and Dana Milbank. Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page
A01 1.4.7 White House refuses to
release Sept 11 info. by Frank Davies Miami Herald May 5
2003 http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/5792329.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp Four 9/11 Moms Battle Bush by
Gail Sheehy Aug 22 2003 1.4.8 http://www.nyobserver.com/pages/story.asp?ID=7816 F.A.A. Official Scrapped Tape
of 9/11 Controllers' Statements 1.4.9 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/06/national/06CND-TAPE.html?hp SECTION
2. THE GOVT DIDN'T JUST "ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN" - IT PLANNED, ORGANIZED
AND CARRIED OUT THE ATTACKS ITSELF. The
evidence in section 1 demonstrated that even if we uncritically accept the
govt claims about 19 Arabs hijacking 4 planes and deliberately crashing
them, we have overwhelming proof that the govt must have known about the
attacks beforehand and been deliberately complicit in allowing them to
happen. As strong as this evidence is, it only scratches the surface. The
following evidence will demonstrate that the official story of the hijackings is
total fiction. |