Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
c/o Forwarding Agent at:
350 – 30th Street,
Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
In Propria Persona
All Rights Reserved
without Prejudice
District Court of the United States
Eastern Judicial District of California
Paul Andrew
Mitchell, ) No. CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS
)
Plaintiff, )
AUTHOR’S VERIFIED
) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
v. )
) 4 U.S.C. 101;
AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al., ) 18 U.S.C. 242;
) 28 U.S.C. 1652, 1746;
Defendants. )
Article VI, Clause 3,
______________________________) U.S.
Constitution.
COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff in the
above entitled case, Citizen of California, Private Attorney General and
Federal Witness, to provide
formal notice to all interested parties, and to demand mandatory judicial
notice by this honorable Court, of this, Plaintiff’s VERIFIED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT charging the following named individuals with the corresponding
criminal violations enumerated infra.
Plaintiff
hereby formally charges:
Dale A.
Drozd with:
commission
of a high misdemeanor by practicing law from the bench without any authority
whatsoever to preside on the Article
III District Court of the United States,
in violation of 28
U.S.C. 454 (one count) (see 28 U.S.C. 631).
Walter P. DeForest with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of
America, as required by Article
VI, Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Wesley C.J. Ehlers with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate
of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the
California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same
(one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such
without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required
to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the California Business and
Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of
America, as required by Article
VI, Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Geoffrey A. Goodman with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate
of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the
California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same
(one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such
without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required
to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the California Business and
Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of
America, as required by Article
VI, Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Jeffrey M. Hamerling with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate
of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the
California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same
(one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such
without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required
to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the California Business and
Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of
America, as required by Article
VI, Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Susan H. Handelman with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate
of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the
California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same
(one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such
without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required
to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the California Business and
Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of
America, as required by Article
VI, Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Eugene J. Majeski with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate
of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the
California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same
(one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such
without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required
to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the California Business and
Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of
America, as required by Article
VI, Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Nancy J. Newman with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate
of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the
California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same
(one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such
without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required
to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the California Business and
Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of
America, as required by Article
VI, Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Benjamin L. Webster with:
commission of a misdemeanor
by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate
of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the
California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same
(one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such
without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required
to be indorsed upon a license by Section 6067 of the California Business and
Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor
by depriving Plaintiff of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are
bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of America,
as required by Article VI,
Section 3, and by 4
U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one
count).
Plaintiff
hereby incorporates by reference His MOTION TO
STRIKE ALL PLEADINGS BY ATTORNEYS LACKING CREDENTIALS and all documents
attached thereto, as previously filed in the instant case, as if set forth
fully herein.
Plaintiff
now testifies that the evidentiary documents incorporated supra are true
and correct, and they do constitute probable cause to charge the above named individuals
with the corresponding criminal violations enumerated supra.
Plaintiff
cites the following authorities in support of His VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,
to wit: Powell v. Alabama, 287
U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”); Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d
1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court
....”); Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson
Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section
“II.”); “Let Us Be Officers of the
Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997); and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes,
1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”).
Plaintiff
hereby demands that Dale A. Drozd recuse himself, effective immediately and
permanently, from all further proceedings in the instant case.
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Plaintiff in the
above entitled action, hereby verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws
of the United States of America, without the “United States”
(federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and
correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and
belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: November 30, 2001 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
___________________________________________
Printed:
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A.,
M.S., Sui Juris
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify,
under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America,
without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18
years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF
the United States of America, and that I personally served the following
document(s):
AUTHOR’S VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
4
U.S.C. 101; 18 U.S.C. 242; 28 U.S.C. 1652, 1746;
Article VI,
Clause 3, U.S. Constitution.
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in
first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to
the following:
Clerk of Court
District Court of the United States
501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento 95814-2322
CALIFORNIA, USA
Courtesy copies to:
Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley DeForest & Koscelnik
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oath)
1001 Marshall Street 3000 Koppers Building
Redwood City 94063 436 Seventh Avenue
CALIFORNIA, USA Pittsburgh 15219
PENNSYLVANIA, USA
Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld LLP Pillsbury Winthrop LLP
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oaths)
P.O. Box 1319 400 Capitol Mall, Suite
1700
Sacramento 95814-1319 Sacramento 95814-4419
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Dated: December 4,
2001 A.D.
Signed: /s/
Paul Andrew Mitchell
__________________________________________________
Printed: Paul
Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff In Propria Persona
(not “Pro Se” [sic])