April 17, 2015 A.D.
Hon. Maria Cantwell
United States Senator
920 West Riverside Avenue
Washington State, USA
Greetings Senator Cantwell:
Thank you for your letter dated April 10, 2015. I will try to limit this cover letter to the major points of fact and law. The important details are already documented in the hyper-links provided below:
On January 28, 2014, I was abducted by rogue federal agents, detained for 325 days, moved 55 times, tortured, defamed, abused, and finally released on December 19, 2014.
A newspaper-style report of some details, up to May 1, 2014, is here:
The primary motive for this attack clearly emerged as the “credential investigation” my office has been conducting at least since 2001:
Even though I had tried to keep Deputy U.S. Marshals informed, over the course of 5 separate meetings, they failed to confirm our major findings e.g. by speaking with key officials at U.S. OPM and OMB:
Of course, it is also very important to realize that our credential investigation was conducted with the full knowledge and timely assistance of the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C.:
And, we did go the extra mile by documenting important results in various Federal Courts e.g.:
Prior to my abduction on 1/28/2014, my apartment was raided by certain Federal agents using a fraudulent “search warrant”, and that incident resulted in these two (2) VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS, ON INFORMATION lodged in State Courts in Wyoming and Colorado:
All evidence indicates that Messrs. James Marcy and Dave Guest have been rampaging the Western States, as part of ongoing IRS attacks on conservative organizations and Tea Party members.
I have also been watching Mr. William M. McCool at least since 1996, when I volunteered to search for missing children in Tucson, Arizona. After he trespassed on our private apartment property and attempted to intimidate me, I assembled the following accusations against him:
The 55 moves I was required to endure during 325 days of illegal incarceration are itemized and documented here:
The Federal “robe” in Wyoming was also clearly retaliating, no doubt because her 4 mandatory credentials turned up missing and defective:
Over the course of that litigation, I ended up filing and serving seven (7) different VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS, itemized here:
You should know that, after being moved to the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, I was repeatedly threatened -- verbally and in writing -- with forced administration of psychotropic pharmaceuticals. Congress has already defined “torture” to include threatening the administration of mind-altering drugs.
I fought back by commencing two (2) lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, in Springfield, Missouri:
The second lawsuit is particularly important because all personnel of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons have also failed to produce any evidence of the U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by the U.S. Constitution and by Acts of Congress which have implemented the Oath of Office Clause:
Because our “credential investigation” figured so prominently in all of the latter litigation, I should also tell you that I have now lodged four (4) “Qui Tam” Complaints under the False Claims Act, but the U.S. Department of Justice fell totally silent:
I am entitled to whistleblower awards under that False Claims Act, for having lodged those four Qui Tam Complaints.
Other retaliations have tortiously interfered with my utility patent pending, my business plans, and my desire to pursue graduate work in computer science at the University of Washington:
But, true to form, personnel of the U.S. Department of Education in downtown Seattle also turned up with counterfeit credentials:
I am a senior man, now 66 years old, and all of the abuses documented above certainly qualify as elder abuse.
More to the merits, the Act of Congress at 5 U.S.C. 5507 expressly prevents Federal officers from being paid if they have failed to execute valid OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS. As such, all of the suspects named above have engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity in direct violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962.
The Civil RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1964(c) expressly authorizes automatic TRIPLE DAMAGES for all such racketeering activities.
I hope this general introduction is sufficient to motivate a formal investigation by your good offices. If you or your staff need any more information, allow me to recommend that you browse all of the documents now archived here on the Internet:
I am particularly pleased with the formal challenge that we brought against the U.S. Senate’s ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:
Thank you again for your professional consideration.
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator, False Claims Act (4X):
31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.;
Qualified Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513, 1514, 3771;
Instructor, Inventor and Systems Development Consultant;
Webmaster, Supreme Law Library: http://supremelaw.org
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)