SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO TRANSMITTAL OF MAIL FRAUD REPORT:
UNDER PROTEST (cf. UCC 1-308)
TO: Hon. Megan Brennan
Postmaster General
Attn: Postal Inspection Service
475 L'Enfant Plaza
Washington 20260
District of Columbia, USA
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
DATE: January 11, 2017 A.D.
SUBJECT: Mail Fraud Reports (PS Form 8165)
Greetings Postmaster General, Postal Inspectors:
The enclosed are transmitted to your official attention, to supplement our prior TRANSMITTAL OF MAIL FRAUD REPORT dated November 7, 2016, and our prior FIRST SUPPLEMENT dated November 22, 2016.
This SECOND SUPPLEMENT concerns Messrs. Erik H. Corwin, Christopher B. Sterner and William J. Wilkins as presently employed by the Office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C.
Our FOIA Request for Mr. Corwin’s APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS was dated June 27, 2016 A.D. In a letter dated November 29, 2016, Mr. Byron D. Endo disclosed a Standard Form 61 which we refused for cause. In order to leave no doubts about our reasons for refusing same, our annotated copy is attached, and those annotations are repeated as follows:
Refused for Causes: no OMB control number or expiration date
SF-61 is inchoate: “(Title)” of administering person is
conspicuous for its absence, prevents inspection for compliance
with 5 USC 2903; “bootleg ICR” violates the Paperwork Reduction
Act: see 44 USC 3512 in particular -- RTS (Returned To Sender)
Documents re: Christopher B. Sterner
Our FOIA Request for Mr. Sterner’s APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS was also dated June 27, 2016 A.D. In a letter also dated November 29, 2016, Mr. Byron D. Endo disclosed a Standard Form 61 which we refused for cause. In order to leave no doubts about our reasons for refusing same, our annotated copy is attached, and those annotations are repeated as follows:
Refused for Cause: “Personnel Clerk” is not an “officer”
authorized to administer Standard Forms 61,
violates 5 U.S.C. 2903 as correctly cited below:
cf. “person specified” -- RTS
Documents re: William J. Wilkins
Our FOIA Request for Mr. Wilkins’ APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS was also dated June 27, 2016 A.D. In a letter dated December 29, 2016, Ms. P. Sharisse Tompkins disclosed a Standard Form 61 which we refused for causes. In order to leave no doubts about our reasons for refusing same, our annotated copy is attached, and those annotations are repeated as follows:
Refused for Causes: no OMB control number or expiration date
no paragraph at bottom citing to 5 U.S.C. 2903 (Authority to
administer) “bootleg ICR” violates Paperwork Reduction Act:
see 44 U.S.C. 3512 in particular -- RTS
Kindly also take particular note of the admission by Ms. Tompkins -- that our FOIA Request dated June 27, 2016 was received by her IRS office on July 6, 2016, and her reply was dated December 29, 2016.
Of greater significance is her failure to disclose any SENATE CONFIRMATION or PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION for Mr. Wilkins, in apparent violation of the Federal statutes cited at Items 3 and 4 in our FOIA Request, namely IRC section 7803(b)(1) and 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).
Furthermore, Ms. Tompkins disclosed Standard Forms 61 for Messrs. Corwin, Sterner and Wilkins on which key signatures were redacted, in apparent violation of long-standing policy of DOJ’s Office of Information Policy in Washington, D.C.
Obviously, Mr. Endo did not deem it necessary to redact the same signatures (see attached).
We are hereby lodging a FORMAL PROTEST to the actions and decisions of Ms. Tompkins. It is now apparent that IRS disclosure personnel are attempting to apply FOIA “exemptions” in error, so as to conceal the identities of personnel who appear to lack authority to administer Standard Forms 61.
This willful concealment is fraud chiefly because of authorities previously cited in our RESERVATION OF RIGHT TO INSPECT all such Standard Forms 61 for compliance with all applicable Federal laws and regulations. See all enclosed copies.
Thank you for your professional consideration in this matter.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964; and,
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et
seq.
All
Rights Reserved
(cf.
UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/corwin/affidavit.refused.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/corwin/affidavit.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/corwin/letter.2016-11-29/page01.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/corwin/foia.request.corwin.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/corwin/affidavit.2.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/sterner/affidavit.refused.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/sterner/affidavit.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/sterner/letter.2016-11-29/page01.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/sterner/foia.request.sterner.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/sterner/affidavit.2.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/affidavit.refused.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/affidavit.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/letter.2016-12-29/page01.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/letter.2016-12-29/page02.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/letter.2016-12-29/page03.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/letter.2016-12-29/page04.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/foia.request.wilkins.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/corwin/reservation.of.right.to.inspect.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/sterner/reservation.of.right.to.inspect.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/wilkins/reservation.of.right.to.inspect.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/mail.fraud.report/usms/page01.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/mail.fraud.report/usms/page02.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/mail.fraud.report/irs/page01.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/mail.fraud.report/irs/page02.gif