FINAL NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR

CREDENTIALS REQUIRED BY LAW

TO: Jennifer A. Giaimo

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 683

Ben Franklin Station

Washington 20044-0683

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

DATE: May 8, 2003 A.D.

SUBJECT: missing credentials

Greetings Ms. Giaimo:

Enclosed please find evidence of my lawful FOIA request for your Appointment Affidavit (OPM Form 61) and delegation of authority to represent the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” before federal courts.

Please note from the enclosed that your Appointment Affidavit is defective for missing essential information. For your convenience, I have highlighted the missing information in yellow (month, day, year, city, State, seal, commission expires, Title).

OPM Form 61 clearly states, in a NOTE at the bottom, that it must be administered by a person specified in 5 U.S.C. 2903. The missing information on your Form 61 gives us probable cause to conclude that the form you signed was not administered in compliance with 5 U.S.C. 2903. Therefore, I have now appealed my FOIA request, because the copy we received from the Tax Division appears to be either counterfeit or a forgery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (a felony).

Also, as you can confirm from the letter dated April 14, 2003, transmitted by Eileen J. O’Connor and signed by J. Brian Ferrel, the Disclosure Officers at the Tax Division were unable to locate any delegation of authority for you. This omission is another reason why I have appealed my original FOIA request in this matter.

I would also like to take this opportunity to provide you with a few cautionary notes concerning personnel currently employed by the United States District Courts in Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona.

In 1996, I was authorized to defend a trust against a bogus grand jury “SUBPOENA”. That litigation very quickly escalated into an inside investigation of mail fraud, jury tampering, perjury, extortion, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity.

Mr. Richard H. Weare, Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Phoenix, was formally charged with multiple counts of violating the federal criminal statutes at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 241, 242, 371, 912, 1510, 1512, and 1702. A copy of that VERIFIED CRIMINAL CROSS-COMPLAINT can be viewed at Internet URL:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/azvmitch/crossco4.htm

We were also making headway investigating the disappearance of some 2,500 missing children who evidently went into the Arizona Child Protective Services agency, never to be seen again. Our investigation led us to pursue facts which eventually disclosed some very serious violations of federal law at the Tucson International Airport (“TIA”). That airport is on land owned by the City of Tucson, but it was never incorporated inside city limits. At that time, it was leased to TIA for the sum of $1.00 per year.

We are still pursuing our major hypothesis that TIA is being used to kidnap children and young adults, and to transport them into foreign countries, where they are forced into prostitution, sex abuse slavery, and drug running. Also, we have reason to believe that some of these kidnapped people were murdered to supply live organs to the medical transplant industry in America. Tucson is a Mafia-controlled town.

It is quite clear to me that the individuals I was required to charge with felony federal offenses were motivated in particular to obstruct my ongoing investigation into the whereabouts of those 2,500 missing children and adults. See 18 U.S.C. 4.

I am citing this particular statute to you, because you need to know that I have no intentions of violating that statute in the case of Dr. and Mrs. Russell M. MacDonald, D.C., with medical offices in Spokane, Washington State. The fact that you may not have proper credentials raises a host of related issues which could eventually lead to formal felony charges being filed against you, in the not too distant future.

Without proper credentials, your appearances in federal courts to date constitute fraud, willful misrepresentation, and contempt of court. Also, all legal mail you may have generated since 5/11/98 constitutes probable cause to charge you with mail fraud (one count for each separate piece of mail transmitted under false and fraudulent pretenses). And, mail fraud is a predicate act to racketeering. See 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.

Please be advised that, if I do not receive any lawful delegation of authority for you, within the statute of limitations stated in the Freedom of Information Act, I will, in that event, have probable cause and a legal obligation to charge you with multiple felony federal offenses in connection with the case(s) in which Dr. and Mrs. MacDonald are currently involved.

Thank you, Ms. Giaimo, for your immediate cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

copies: Dr. and Mrs. Russell M. MacDonald

Hon. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General

J. Brian Ferrel, Senior Division Counsel, Tax Division

Clerk of Court, U.S. District Court, Spokane

Ms. Cynthia Imbrogno, U.S. District Court, Spokane