FORMAL COMPLAINT against The State Bar of California

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:16 PM

Subject: FORMAL COMPLAINT against The State Bar of California, and

all 253,306 living "members" (as of February 2015)

To: dca@dca.ca.gov

Department of Consumer Affairs

Consumer Information Division

1625 North Market Blvd., Suite N 112

Sacramento 95834

California, USA

Attention: Executive Officers

Greetings DCA Executive Officers:

Beginning in late August 2001, my office has been investigating

registered "members" of The State Bar of California in my capacities

as a Private Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. 1964 (Civil RICO), and later

as an Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4 TIMES)

under 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq. (Federal Civil False Claims Act).

See, for example, the list of seven (7) SUBPOENAs issued by

the Federal District Court Clerk in Sacramento in the matter

of Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/related.subpoenas.htm

Soon after those 7 attorneys failed to produce any valid licenses

and any valid certificates of oath, as the sole Plaintiff in that case

we served The State Bar of California with the following blanket

SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/subpoena.statebar.1.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/delivery.instructions.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/subpoena.statebar.4.gif

No licenses to practice law, and no certificates of oath,

were transmitted to the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court,

as required by the latter Directions for Delivery.

This is still true, even today!

We hereby formally complain that the FRONT SIDE ONLY

of one (1) required license has been disclosed, and

the BACK SIDE ONLY of one (1) other certificate of oath

has been disclosed to date. Electronic copies of those

two (2) sides are archived here:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/rainmaker/azar/State.Bar.License.1.landscape.JPG

http://supremelaw.org/cc/rainmaker/azar/nad.reverse.side.htm (also IN DEFAULT)

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/customized.certificate.jpg

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/customized.certificate.transmittal.jpg

As such, we further complain that The State Bar of California

are now IN CONTEMPT of the above blanket SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE; and,

as such, given the passage of so much time after it was duly served

via Registered U.S. Mail, their CONTEMPT of said SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE

has resulted in activating estoppel against The State Bar of California

and against all of its 253,306 reportedly living "members".

Such silence can be equated with fraud: U.S. v. Tweel; and,

such silence also activates estoppel: Carmine v. Bowen.

Cf. also "laches" as defined in Law Dictionaries.

Thank you for your careful and professional consideration of this

FORMAL COMPLAINT.

Please also appreciate my sincere desire to reach a fair and reasonable

resolution of this matter, without requiring extensive and expensive

Court litigation. For example, it may be that the Office of President Trump

may consent to supervise settlement negotiations, after delegation to the

United States Attorney General as soon as the latter is duly confirmed

by the United States Senate. The United States Secretary of the Treasury

may also wish to join settlement negotiations, in light of the principal

amounts now showing as payable to the Treasury of the United States

in these PAST DUE INVOICEs:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/invoice.3.htm ($2.25 TRILLION minus Management Fees)

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/invoice.2.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/invoice.1.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/notice.of.intent.to.invoice.htm

For example, there is an opportunity here for settlement amounts

to be paid, either in part or in full, by professional liability insurance

underwriters, assuming such insurance contracts remain in force.

Further reading:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/pastor.don.broadcast.outline.htm (see all links)

p.s.

It is not wise or prudent to transfer jurisdiction of this FORMAL COMPLAINT

to The State Bar of California, because additional research

has now confirmed that it currently employs several attorneys

who are likewise also "members," as registered here:

http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/membersearch/quicksearch

We object in advance to all such conflicts of interest.

Bcc:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C.

Attention: The Hon. Jeff Sessions (nominated for the Office of Attorney General)

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4 times),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.:

U.S. ex rel. Madden v. General Dynamics Corp. (9th Cir.)