MEMO

 

TO:        Susan H. Handelman

           Eugene J. Majeski

           Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley

           1001 Marshall Street

           Redwood City 94063

           CALIFORNIA, USA

           fax: (650) 367-0997

 

FROM:      Paul Andrew Mitchell

           Private Attorney General

 

DATE:      October 12, 2001 A.D.

 

SUBJECT:   Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.

           Case No. CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS

 

 

From our Forwarding Agent in Oakland, California, I received today six (6) pleadings filed by your firm in the above entitled case.

 

Before we go any further, I wanted to give you an opportunity to amend a systematic error which appears on all 6 pleadings:

 

I have petitioned the Article III District Court of the United States (a constitutional court), not the Article IV United States District Court (a legislative tribunal).

 

For pertinent authorities on this all important distinction, please see the following Internet URL’s:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/dcus.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/karmacts.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-e

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/makarian/notice.rule.44.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/makarian/mot.strike.oppos.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/transmittal.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/intervention.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/dcus.in.28usc.bold.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/usdc.in.28usc.bold.htm

 

 

I trust that, taken together, these Internet resources do more than enough to substantiate the important differences between these two courts.  They are provided free of charge to you, and to the entire nation.

 

In summary, your pleadings petition the wrong court.

 

If you don’t amend your pleadings to reflect the correct caption, I will proceed on the presumption that you wish to continue pleading to the wrong court.

 


Also, please regard this paragraph as a polite demand that you and Eugene J. Majeski serve a certified copy of your licenses to practice law, with your oaths of office correctly indorsed upon same, at My proper mailing location, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 19, 2001 A.D..  See Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code.  Do not file any more pleadings until you have complied with this paragraph.

 

Thank you.

 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff,

Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/index.htm

 

U.S. Mail c/o:

 

     Forwarding Agent

     350 – 30th Street, Suite 444

     Oakland 94609-3426

     CALIFORNIA, USA

 

[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]

 

p.s.  I never spell my name in ALL CAPS, so your caption makes

      another grievous error there, as well.

 

copies: Walter P. DeForest

        DeForest & Koscelnik

 

        Clerk of Court

        Attention:  L. Reader

        District Court of the United States

        501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200

        Sacramento 95814-2322

        CALIFORNIA, USA

 

        paralegals

 

This memo published at Internet URL:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/cmu.edu/memo01.htm