MEMO
TO: Susan H. Handelman
Eugene J. Majeski
Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley
1001 Marshall Street
Redwood City 94063
CALIFORNIA, USA
fax: (650) 367-0997
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell
Private Attorney General
DATE: October 12, 2001 A.D.
SUBJECT: Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
From our Forwarding Agent in Oakland, California, I received today six (6) pleadings filed by your firm in the above entitled case.
Before we go any further, I wanted to give you an opportunity to amend a systematic error which appears on all 6 pleadings:
I have petitioned the Article III District Court of the United States (a constitutional court), not the Article IV United States District Court (a legislative tribunal).
For pertinent authorities on this all important distinction, please see the following Internet URL’s:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/dcus.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/karmacts.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-e
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/makarian/notice.rule.44.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/makarian/mot.strike.oppos.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/transmittal.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/intervention.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/dcus.in.28usc.bold.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/usdc.in.28usc.bold.htm
I trust that, taken together, these Internet resources do more than enough to substantiate the important differences between these two courts. They are provided free of charge to you, and to the entire nation.
In summary, your pleadings petition the wrong court.
If you don’t amend your pleadings to reflect the correct caption, I will proceed on the presumption that you wish to continue pleading to the wrong court.
Also, please regard this paragraph as a polite demand that you and Eugene J. Majeski serve a certified copy of your licenses to practice law, with your oaths of office correctly indorsed upon same, at My proper mailing location, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 19, 2001 A.D.. See Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code. Do not file any more pleadings until you have complied with this paragraph.
Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff,
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/index.htm
U.S. Mail c/o:
Forwarding Agent
350 – 30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]
p.s. I never spell my name in ALL CAPS, so your caption makes
another grievous error there, as well.
copies: Walter P. DeForest
DeForest & Koscelnik
Clerk of Court
Attention: L. Reader
District Court of the United States
501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento 95814-2322
CALIFORNIA, USA
paralegals
This memo published at Internet URL: