Supreme Law Firm Endorses

George W. Bush for President

 

by

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Counselor at Law, Federal Witness

and Private Attorney General

 

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                       October 28, 2000 A.D.

 

 

San Francisco.  The Supreme Law Firm, founded by Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General, today endorsed George Bush for President of the United States.  With the general election less than two weeks away, Mitchell took a break from judicial activism to applaud Bush for showing badly needed leadership -- by tackling tough issues, like Social Security.

 

“America is still waking up from a fuzzy dream,” Mitchell said.  “While their fellow Citizens were sleeping, undisciplined Democrats like Clinton and Gore have liberally robbed the trust funds, such as they are.  Gore now promises to do the same, by paying banks for their bogus liens, instead of retired Americans.”

 

Mitchell has spent the past 10+ years, struggling against enormous odds, to expose the Social Security system as a fraudulent municipal pyramid scheme.  Recently, in their lead editorial on 7/12/2000, the Wall Street Journal openly called Social Security a Ponzi Scheme.

 

The original Social Security Act is part of a much larger fraud, Mitchell argues, because the Congress has now been caught trying to enforce municipal laws inside the 50 States.  “Whenever this happens,” Mitchell added, “it is a blatant violation of the Tenth Amendment and proof that the federal government has become a criminal enterprise.”

 

“It is also clear, in light of this important admission, that the Social Security Administration is now violating many of the States’ laws prohibiting insurance fraud.  The letter ‘I’ in FICA stands for Insurance,” he explained.  Social Security taxes are identified as FICA contributions on most paychecks.

 

Mitchell’s prime target, during all these many years of activism, is the Internal Revenue Service, now exposed as a money laundry and extortion racket, with a legal situs in Puerto Rico.  Mitchell believes that Gore will perpetuate the federal government’s rampage against Rights, which Clinton has been leading for 8 full years.

 

“Just read Feeling Your Pain: The Explosion and Abuse of Government Power in the Clinton-Gore Years, by James Bovard,” Mitchell advises.  This book is currently in print.

 

“The IRS is operating under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration, which was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1935, in the case of U.S. v. Constantine,” Mitchell added.  “This explains all the cross-linkages between Titles 26 and 27, which clearly violate federal prohibitions against ‘cross-over’ regulations.”

 

“We recently persuaded a client to petition a federal court for an ORDER freezing all IRS assets, and a preliminary injunction preventing IRS from depositing any tax collections into any accounts other than the Treasury of the United States.”  Section 7809 of the Internal Revenue Code requires IRS to deposit all collections into the Treasury of the United States.

 

Mitchell emphasizes how revealing the IRS-written regulations are on this one point.  Regulations for Title 26 of the United States Code specify that checks and money orders should be made payable to the Internal Revenue Service, and not the Treasury of the United States.

 

“That is not the only serious discrepancy that exists between the laws and the regulations,” Mitchell warns.  “The regulations for IRC section 1 create a specific liability, but the corresponding statute at section 1 does not create a specific liability.  Gore knows, or should know, about these serious flaws in the federal income tax, but he has done nothing about them.”

 

“On the basis of sheer political probabilities,” Mitchell quips, “Bush is much more likely to side with the People, as the IRS crisis reaches its inevitable climax.  They deserve to be buried under the Titanic, to rust in peace along with the rest of the jelly fish of this planet.  Bush can lead;  Gore won’t.”

 

Mitchell goes on to explain that only Congress can make law;  the executive branch is attempting to make law when their regulations exceed the underlying statutory authority;  and, when they do so, they violate provisions in the U.S. Constitution, which vests all legislative power in the Congress.

 

“And, answer this one question:  Does Al Gore love the IRS?”  Mitchell asks.

 

“When we do a careful comparison of their actions, and not just their words, Bush is the clear winner for neutralizing the ‘third rail’ with his public willingness to take the helm.  Gore, on the other hand, is so entrenched in sustaining the oligarchy, we have every reason to expect that he does not have what it takes to prevent a Social Security disaster, when the baby boom begins to retire,” Mitchell elaborated.

 

Mitchell here refers to the unusually large population cohort of Americans born between 1946 and 1964 -– too large to be explained by soldiers returning from World War II.  It has been compared to a “pig in a python”, as this “bulge” moves through time.  The leading edge will be eligible to retire in 2008, just seven years from now.

 

In related developments, Mitchell recently informed the U.S. Supreme Court that the People of America now intend to apply for a Writ of Mandamus, compelling the 8th Circuit in St. Louis, Missouri, to rule on their application for intervention of right in a major tax case.  The initial decision in that case was UNPUBLISHED, but a recent ruling by that same court has held that unpublished opinions are unconstitutional.

 

The 8th Circuit’s original opinion held that the Internal Revenue Code is not vague.  Mitchell intends to challenge this ruling for creating a bad precedent.  “The proof of vagueness is well documented, and overwhelming,” Mitchell concluded.

 

More details are available at Internet URL’s:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/suter.10-26-2000.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/index.htm

 

 

#  #  #