FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September
21, 2016 A.D.
IRS Office of Chief Counsel
Now Obstructing a
Federal Tort Claim after
Protecting Lois Lerner
Personnel of the IRS Chief Counsel's
Office in Washington, D.C., are now suspected of obstructing a proper
administrative tort
claim initially submitted to the U.S. Marshals Service
by Paul Andrew Mitchell, a nationally recognized Private Attorney General.
The IRS Chief
Counsel's Office is the same group implicated in aiding and abetting Lois
Lerner's systematic retaliations against Tea Party affiliates and conservative
organizations whose applications for tax-exempt status were intentionally and
corruptly delayed.
This evidence
now calls for the conclusion that the Lois Lerner scandal also orchestrated
criminal retaliations against individuals and activists, in addition to
organizations reportedly targeted by Lerner and her accomplices.
The Supreme Law Firm
has now obtained a copy of email correspondence
between Lois Lerner and Mark S. Kaizen,
Associate Chief Counsel for the IRS.
Disclosure of that email was compelled by litigation originally
commenced by the organization Judicial Watch.
The administrative tort claim in question was initially
submitted by Paul Andrew Mitchell to the Office of General Counsel
for the U.S. Marshals Service in Washington, D.C. USMS personnel were principally responsible
for his false arrest and false incarceration for 11 months during 2014.
And, when Mitchell was finally released
in December 2014, USMS personnel attempted to throw him out of the Gering,
Nebraska jail
into 4 inches of snow at 4:30 PM on a Friday, with no clothes, no money, no
food, no job, no friends and nowhere to go.
Mitchell recently obtained a copy of the USMS Policy
Directives which leave no doubt that the USMS are responsible for all
prisoner custody and all prisoner transportation. Mitchell was never in any mode of IRS custody
at any time during those 11 months.
Moreover, Gerald M. Auerbach, claiming to be the General Counsel for the
USMS, has now failed
to produce valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS, which are clearly required of all such
Federal officers by the U.S. Constitution and by Acts of Congress which
have implemented that Clause.
Auerbach referred Mitchell's tort
claim to the IRS Office of Chief Counsel after what Auerbach
described as "consultation with the Internal Revenue Service". "IRS is the federal agency responsible
for the final determination of your claim," Auerbach
alleged in a letter
dated December 21, 2015.
Auerbach then refused to disclose any
names of IRS Chief Counsel personnel with whom he had
consulted, after Mitchell followed up with a request
for their identities.
Auerbach is also listed as the chief
of the "Ethics
Team" in the USMS General Counsel's Office. All those Ethics Team members have now failed
to produce any evidence of valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS, after Mitchell
submitted proper FOIA Requests for their credentials.
Thus, not only was Auerbach in
error by referring Mitchell's tort claim to the IRS; he is also suspected now of impersonating an
officer of the Federal Government in blatant violation of numerous sections of
the Federal Criminal Code e.g. impersonation, mail fraud, witness
retaliation, obstructing justice, and conspiring to engage in a pattern of
racketeering activities.
Mark S. Kaizen attempted to "deny"
Mitchell's tort claim for spurious reasons.
For example, Kaizen tried to say that Mitchell's tort claim had failed
to state a claim for false arrest and false imprisonment under the laws of
Wyoming and Washington State. However,
Mitchell had been moved a total of 55 different times,
which caused him to cross the boundaries of many other States.
Moreover, after investigating the relevant Federal statutes
and court decisions, Mitchell found
no requirement that his original administrative tort claim needed to cite any
such State laws by chapter and verse.
In any event, Kaizen's Office of
Chief Counsel never had any
jurisdiction to review or to "deny" Mitchell's tort claim, primarily
because of the clear duties imposed upon the U.S. Marshals by their own written
Policy
Directives.
Like Auerbach's "Ethics
Team," personnel employed by the IRS Office of Chief Counsel have also
failed to produce evidence of valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS, after Mitchell
promptly submitted FOIA Requests for that mandatory credential required of each
of those personnel by applicable Federal statutes.
An Act of Congress at 5 U.S.C. 5507 even
bars such personnel from being paid if they have not executed a valid U.S. Office of Personnel Management Standard Form
61.
Even though all have received extensive follow-up
documentation in support of Mitchell's tort claim, the 2 U.S. Senators from
Oregon and the Congressman
representing the district where Mitchell now lives and works, have all fallen
totally silent, even after Rep. Peter DeFazio agreed to assist
with Mitchell's FOIA Requests.
Further
reading:
http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/credential.investigation.facts.and.laws.htm
# # #
