The Credential Investigation:

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

 

 

Partial Chronology of FOIA Requests and Replies:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm

 

Folder with Partial List of FOIA Requests, Appeals and Replies:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/

 

Master List of Missing and Defective Credentials for the Federal Judiciary:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm

 

Master List of Missing Licenses for California State Judiciary:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/calcourts/evidence.folders.2012-12-13.htm

 

Summary of Applicable Laws, Regulations and Court Decisions:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/laws.and.regs.htm

 

Standing Authorities re: Commissions and Oaths:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm

 

Laws Designating Custodian of Oaths of Federal Judges:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/federal.judges.htm

 

Talkshoe Transcript Discussing Federal Credential Requirements:

http://supremelaw.org/authors/stark/transcript.re.credentials.htm

 

Reservation of Right to Inspect Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS:

http://supremelaw.org/letters/reservation.of.right.to.inspect.htm

 

COUNTERFEIT revisions of Standard Form 61 – June 1986, June 1996, August 2002:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/opmdocs/sf61.June.1986.pdf

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/opmdocs/sf61.June.1996.pdf

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/opmdocs/sf61.August.2002.pdf

 

VALID versions of Standard Form 61:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/opmdocs/sf61.December.1966.pdf

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/rehnquist/affidavit.gif

 

Formal NOTICE OF MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE CREDENTIALS, Second Circuit:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm

 

Formal NOTICE OF MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE CREDENTIALS, USDC Oregon:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hammond/United.States.Notice.htm

 

Crucial Admission by U.S. Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”):

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/letter.2012-08-06/

 

Crucial Admissions by U.S. Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”):

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/letter.2012-08-23/

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/letter.2013-01-25/

 

Key Excerpt from OPM’s GUIDE TO PROCESSING PERSONNEL ACTIONS:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/entry.on.duty.process.htm

 

Longer Excerpt from OPM’s GUIDE TO PROCESSING PERSONNEL ACTIONS:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/gppa03.pdf

 

Key Points of Crucial Meeting #4 with Deputy U.S. Marshals, Seattle:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/USMS.Meeting.No.4.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/document.130/notice.errors.clarifications.htm

 

Status Memo to Deputy U.S. Marshals, San Diego, California:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/marshals/memo.2006-09-22.htm

 

Status Memo to Oregon Department of Justice, General Counsel Division:

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/uoregon.edu/memo.ag01.htm

 

Essay Analyzing Duties of Federal Court Clerks and Deputy Clerks:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/initial/clerks.or.jerks.htm

 

Essay Documenting Extensive Retaliation by USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/initial/blowing.whistles.htm

 

MEMORANDUM OF LAW Re: CLERK OF COURT IS AN OFFICER:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/pleading.05/memorandum.htm

 

NOTICE OF BONA FIDE CONTROVERSY AT LAW:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/pleading.06/controversy.at.law.htm

 

Formal Pleading Documenting Bias and Prejudice against Investigator:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/disqualifications/application.for.disqualifications.htm

 

First Cross-Complaint Seeking Relief from Such Retaliation:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/

 

Leading MOTION to Enforce ICCPR and Courts of Competent Jurisdiction:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/iccpr/

 

Second Cross-Complaint to Enforce FOIA on U.S. Bureau of Prisons:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil2/

 

List of Seven (7) CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS Arising from Documented Retaliation:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vcc.list.htm

 

VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS Violation Matrix:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vcc.matrix.htm

 

Four (4) Qui Tam Complaints Lodged Under the Federal False Claims Act:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc1/criminal.complaint.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc2/criminal.complaint.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc3/criminal.complaint.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/davis/Tax%20Court/vcc4/criminal.complaint.htm

 

Internet Broadcast Discussing The State Bar of California:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/pastor.don.broadcast.outline.htm

 

SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE to Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (IN DEFAULT):

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/subpoena.director.1.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/delivery.instructions.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/subpoena.director.2.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/subpoena.director.3.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/reminder.htm  (IN DEFAULT)

 

SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE to The State Bar of California (IN DEFAULT):

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/subpoena.statebar.1.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/delivery.instructions.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/subpoena.statebar.2.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/subpoena.statebar.3.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/subpoena.statebar.4.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/subpoena.statebar.5.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/related.subpoenas.htm

 

Q&A Concerning 2 Major INVOICEs, Both PAST DUE and IN DEFAULT:

http://supremelaw.org/authors/maugans/Two.Invoices.htm

 

VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT against The State Bar of California:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/criminal.complaint.4.htm

 

Demands to California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal (IN DEFAULT):

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/calcourts/

 

Master List of Missing Licenses for California State Judiciary:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/calcourts/evidence.folders.2012-12-13.htm

 

 

Other documentary evidence will be added to this list,

as the need arises and when such evidence becomes available.

 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

 

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

 

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

 

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)