REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION
TO: Mr. Thomas F. Hogan
dba U.S. District Judge
333 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington 20001
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
DATE: April 18, 2007 A.D.
SUBJECT: malfeasance in office
Greetings Mr. Hogan:
I honestly regret to say that your recent misconduct and demonstrable malfeasance, in several matters for which my office is responsible, now cause me to request your immediate resignation from the office of United States District Judge.
First of all, your letter to me, dated February 16, 2007, manifested a total disregard for the federal statutes which expressly designate the Clerk of Court as the legal custodian of all APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS, and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) as the legal custodian of all PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS, for duly appointed federal district judges. Please see this Internet URL for scanned copies of your letter and of our proper refusal for cause:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hogan.thomas/letter.2007-02-16/
If you had bothered to perform your known legal duties in this matter, you would have investigated and confirmed that a proper SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE was served on the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, and that SUBPOENA is now PAST DUE and in DEFAULT:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/
Secondly, as you should already know in your capacity as “Chief Judge” of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, DOJ has now replied to our proper FOIA Request with a written admission that several personnel currently seated on that court are lacking one or more of the four (4) credentials required of all federal district judges. As their supervisor in fact, you are now liable to the United States, and to the People of the United States of America, for multiple violations of the federal statutes at 42 U.S.C. 1986 (neglect to prevent, refusal to prevent) and also 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 3, 4, 912, 1001, 1341 and 1961 et seq. Confer also at “respondeat superior” in Black’s Law Dictionary in re vicarious liability.
Thirdly, and perhaps of immensely greater significance, I find it quite shocking and impossible to believe that you would summarily dismiss torture allegations against Donald H. Rumsfeld, when the historical record now documents extensive physical evidence of innumerable abominations at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. For example, read the interview with Dr. John Pace, UN Human Rights Commissioner, describing autopsy results on 900 of the 1,100 cadavers received from prison Abu Ghraib by the Baghdad morgue during July of 2005.
Concerning Mr. Rumsfeld, in particular, my office performed its duties under 18 U.S.C. 4, and under our pro bono verbal agreement to provide the U.S. Coast Guard with 9/11 follow-up, by lodging the following VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia i.e. “your Court”:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/vcc.htm
You should know that the Clerk of your Court attempted to return that VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT to me, via U.S. Mail. We refused that mail because it constituted evidence of obstruction of justice and a clear violation of the Petition Clause in the First Amendment.
Mr. Hogan, none of the above is a trivial or inconsequential matter, as far as we are concerned, and as far as the People of the USA are also concerned. On the contrary, the malfeasance which you and your accessories and co-conspirators have demonstrated to date is already enough to warrant long prison terms, if not also enormous actual damages for which the Congress has authorized the automatic triple damage multiplier at 18 U.S.C. 1964.
If you are not already familiar with this statute, then you never deserved to be a federal district judge in the first place. There is no doubt in my mind that you have grossly violated the two (2) solemn oaths of office required of you by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and 28 U.S.C. 453.
Kindly submit your prompt resignation to the Office of President, whence your PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION originated pursuant to signatures by President Ronald Reagan and Attorney General William French Smith.
Thank you for your immediate cooperation.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a), Rotella v. Wood:
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
