Harassing without cause or provocation


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Eric Wiley on July 22, 1998 at 12:50:42:

In Reply to: Re: Can you say IDIOT? posted by Eat my shorts, dude. on July 22, 1998 at 11:24:01:

I got a copy of Mr. Mitchell's e-mail as well. When I asked him to send me more specific information, he sent me the most insulting and unprofessional reponse I've ever read from an "educated" person. Rather than share my personal views of his lack of professionalism, I'll let you decide for yourself. Here's his response to my *second* polite request for more information about the copyright violation he claims we're makeing:

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [SMTP:supremelawfirm@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 12:09 PM
To: Wiley, Eric G.
Subject: COPYRIGHT VIOLATION #2

The information you are now requesting
has already been supplied -- in the
NOTICE AND DEMAND previously transmitted.

An electronic copy of that message is
not conveniently available to me at
this moment.

You have our permission to contact the
individual subscriber(s) responsible for
the web page(s) in question.

In further reply to your message below,
we refer you to Internet URL:

http://supremelaw.com/wwwboard/messages/1200.html

If you don't understand plain English,
then get some help -- somewhere else.

Copies of "The Federal Zone" now extant on the
Internet were stolen, and then modified
WITHOUT THE AUTHOR'S PRIOR PERMISSION.

We are therefore now demanding that ALL copies,
in whole or in part, and ALL links, whether
in web pages or in search indexes, be removed
COMPLETELY AND IMMEDIATELY.

I am sure that Webster's Dictionary has most
of the above words well defined, for your
reading enjoyment.

If you don't understand the legal implications,
then hire someone who can explain it all to you.

There are criminal penalties in the federal
copyright laws, in case you are ignorant of
these laws.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Author (under a pen name)


---"Wiley, Eric G." wrote:
>
>
> Paul,
>
> Please specify the exact URL that is in violation at the www.xxx.xxx
> site and we'll remove it. Currently, I have no idea what your talking
> about but will gladly cooperate if you give me more information. Your
> form letters tells me nothing.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Eric Wiley
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Wiley
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 12:56 PM
> > Subject: FW: COPYRIGHT VIOLATION #2
> >
> >
> > >
> > >----------
> > >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 12:46:34 PM
> > >To: Eric Wiley
> > >Subject: COPYRIGHT VIOLATION #2
> > >Auto forwarded by a Rule
> > >
> > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
> >
> > A lawful PUBLIC NOTICE TO COPYRIGHT VIOLATORS
> > has been published and posted at Internet URL:
> >
> > http://supremelaw.com/wwwboard/messages/1181.html
> >
> > with a supplement at URL:
> >
> > http://supremelaw.com/wwwboard/messages/1182.html
> >
> >
> > You are hereby served with same.
> >
> >
> > Sincerely yours,
> >
> > /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
> >
> > Counselor at Law, Federal Witness,
> > Private Attorney General, and Candidate
> > for the U.S. House of Representatives
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---Eric Wiley wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul,
> > >
> > > Is there a link to the material from anywhere on www.ans.net? If
> > so,
> > > please let me know and we'll have it removed.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Eric Wiley




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]