Re: 2 IRS Agents Expose it all

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Common Right Group on January 09, 1998 at 05:52:58:

In Reply to: 2 IRS Agents Expose it all posted by joe on January 07, 1998 at 07:11:40:

Joe and ....
Do you guys or either of you have a private e-mail address? If you feel paranoid about giving it out publicly, we understand and don't blame you. If you are suspicious of us, take another peek at some of our posts. True, we don't overtly antagonize the beast, but we aren't crawling underr rocks either. We'd like to communicate with you a little on a one-to-one basis, if you are willing. You may send us your e-mail "slot" by using ours, thus keeping it out of the mainstream of traffic.
We are a little curious about your failure to mention 4 USC 72. Some of our greatest successes with federales of any color, shape, or size, have come from wheeling that little, easy to remember, statute out of the woodwork, just like the IRS ( an entity that does not lawfully exist except under P.R. Trust #62 - as you said ), likes to wheel out the anti-injunction statute, which, of course, only applies to the collection of a 'legitimate' tax.
Actually, we have found, after about five years of buying silver bullets (finally quit that) and reading everything - twice - that Otto Skinner's book (....Loophole...) is the best overall, and cuts past the frills and foolishness pretty doggoned well.
'Names' are private property.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]