Re: Admiralty jurisdiction

Subject:

Comments:
: : Jim, : : I recommend listening to Howard Freeman teaching. : : Mr. Freeman is now deceased, but his expertise lives : : on in the form of audio tapes and writings. He : : talks slowly and in great detail about jurisdictions. : : Currently, I am defending a speeding ticket in San : : Diego by using the "confused defendant" manner of defense : : whereby you refuse to plead and place yourself under : : the Court's statutory jurisdiction. Rather, I say : : that I do not understand the "nature of the charges," : : and as long as that is the status, the judge cannot : : lawfully take jurisdiction. There is a lot more to it, : : of course, but it is all available in his 10-tape series : : that costs $40 and is available from America's Promise : : Ministries, P. O. Box 157, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864. : : (No e-mail or phone number availabe as I write this : : response. Sorry.) : : This method has been used quite successfully in several : : recent traffic court cases, and Mr. Freeman had a : : perfect record of wins over the IRS during the 70's and : : 80's with this defense. The goal is to force the : : judge back under common law by a series of innocent : : questions. : : Primary thing to remember: NEVER NEVER go into a : : Court criticizing the judge, demanding rights, accusing : : the Court of being under Admiralty (they're not, necessarily), : : or under statutory. The court can be under any juris- : : diction it chooses. It is up to you to use wisdom and : : careful words to get the Court to admit it's juris- : : diction and then exercise your remedy under UCC I-207. : : All that is fully and succinctly explained in the : : tapes. I can say that from having NO understanding : : whatsoever about the law and jurisdictions, I now have : : a confident understanding and can hold my own in any : : Court of Law without an attorney. Especially if I : : have not harmed anyone or any property. This defense : : is especially useful for those people facing willful : : failure to file charges. : : Good Luck and God Bless. : : LeAnne : LeAnne: : I have been listening to Howard's tapes : extensively, as I believe jurisdiction is the key : to understanding all this. : The one thing I have been looking for is : verification of Howard's claims about which : jurisdictions compel performance, which are : civil, and which are criminal. : Also, for a contract to be valid under Common Law, : one has enter it "knowingly", "voluntarily", and : "intentionally". Any other aspects about Common : Law we should know, since if we are going to : reserve our Common Law right(s) (UCC 1-207), we : should know what ones exist. : Is there a basic course on these jurisdictions, : please let know. : Also, Howard mentioned on the one of the tapes : some letters of people who had gotten letters from : the IRS, and they wrote response letters claiming : they were not under the jurisdiction of the United : States (as opposed to the United States of : America). The one example he gives is a lady's : response of "I do not reside in Washington, D.C., : nor in the federal enclaves, therefore I am not : under the jurisdiction of the United States." The : IRS then left her alone. I would love to get : copies of these letters. In fact, I would love to : get copies of everything he kept in his apartment : that he used to use as an office, where even his : stove was used a filing cabinet. : He mentioned a man named Harry Koombs (sp?) who : was supposedly going to put together a book on : how to read the IRS code. This man apparently had : a 17th grade english level, and claimed that if : people knew english, they would know immediately : that they were not required to file an income tax. : Have you heard of this man's book? : Well, gotta go. It's very late (3 a.m.). : I hope you can help me. Let me know if I can help. : Hope things went well with your ticket. : Lee

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: