Re: Use the USC?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Common Right Group at San Diego county on May 23, 1997 at 04:48:57:

In Reply to: Re: Use the USC? posted by Dean Arthur on May 02, 1997 at 04:35:52:

: : : The men/women of Oath an Affirmation are UNDER the U.S.C..
: : : If Citizen In Party makes a special visit upon the court
: : : to expose the Knowledge and Neglect of 42 USC 1986 which
: : : with others of Oath an Affirmation set up the conspiracy
: : : to deprive other Citizens In Party of rights protected
: : : per 42 USC 1985, thus causing an injury due to such
: : : deprivation of rights under 42 USC 1983 then the Citizen
: : : In Party has set his case in stone IF the Complaint
: : : contains NONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
: : : 1. adjectives
: : : 2. adverbs
: : : 3. assumptions
: : : 4. conclusions
: : : 5. presumptions
: : : 6. pronouns

: : : Remember the following rules of procedure which are NOT taught
: : : in law schools:

: : : 1. No fact may introduced into evidence.
: : : 2. All facts must be:
: : : a) Timely
: : : b) Highly defined

: :
: : Thanks for the reply but... I'm still a little
: : confused: I think my question was worded badly,
: : what I was trying to ask was in all the Affadavits
: : of recission, Affadavits of State Citizenship,
: : etc..., that people are posting/selling on the
: : internet, the authors of these forms use the
: : IRC, the USC, and the CFR to bolster and
: : substantiate rights and claims of status, and to
: : PROTECT THEMSELVES by these federally created
: : statutes. Aren't they then "having their cake
: : and eating it too?" In other words how can one
: : state that you are free of jurisdiction by the
: : IRS by using the IRC to bolster that argument.
: : and how can one use the UCC or CFR to protect
: : oneselft when you are already probably protected
: : by the Constitution and Laws that do apply to
: : you? (side: why wouldn't one have the right to
: : have cake and eat it too, what a dumb saying,
: : i'm sorry i used it now.)

: If you want to use the Constitution, by all means,
: do so. But it behooves all who would to read and
: understand the document so as to be able to quote
: it forward and backward and KNOW what the words
: mean. For this a copy of Bouvier's Law Dictionary
: of 1839 and Webster's 1828 Dictionary of the
: English language would help to enable each to know
: the meanings of the words used.

: Comparison between Webster's 1828 and a current
: dictionary might amaze one at how much the meaning
: of words has changed. Ditto for comparison between
: a 1st Edition of Black's Law and the 6th Edition or
: comparison between Bouvier's 1839 "Entered according
: to an Act of Congress" and the "copyrighted" 1914
: edition.

: Use of the Internal Re-venue Code is resorted to in
: order to establish the wrongs perpetrated by agents
: of the I.R.S./B.A.T.F. crowd in order to cowe the
: people into submission to unconstitutional secret
: "codes" whose real meanings are known only to a
: select few and withheld from the rest.

: Same with the United States Code and Federal Rules
: of Civil Procedure.

: You have to establish that your opponents had
: knowledge of the law and failed to stop the wrong
: being done which damaged you. Since they swore an
: oath to protect and support the Constitution, any
: failure to do so is prima facie evidence of
: contempt for the constitution, constructive treason
: and perjury of oath under 18 U.S.C. 1621.

: I am involved in litigation in a county court. The
: prosecutor used My spelling of name and location to
: send me an envelope containing paper addressed to a
: fictitious "person" whose name can be spelled in
: all capital letters. Since I had already denounced
: such spelling of My Christian appellation absent
: an instrument with My bona fide signature which
: established My subjugation to statutory enactments,
: the prosecutor's mailing of such a document is
: prima facie proof of malfeasance and violation of
: 18 U.S.C. 1342, Mail Fraud. And prosecutor
: prattles on about court cases establishing the duty
: of "persons" (i.e. those failing to demurr the use
: of their names in all capital letters) to obey the
: statutes enacted by their peer "persons" who are
: U.S. citizens "residing" in the states.

: First know who you are and then learn how to defend
: your status and put the burden of proof on your
: opponents.

: If you're not having fun, you're not doing it
: right!
By jove, I think you've got it maitee (mate)! The rest of youse guys, listen to this one, he's been doing his homework!




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]