Re: Use the USC?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Dan DePriest on May 25, 1997 at 18:43:50:

In Reply to: Re: Use the USC? posted by Common Right Group at San Diego county on May 23, 1997 at 04:48:57:

: : : : The men/women of Oath an Affirmation are UNDER the U.S.C..
: : : : If Citizen In Party makes a special visit upon the court
: : : : to expose the Knowledge and Neglect of 42 USC 1986 which
: : : : with others of Oath an Affirmation set up the conspiracy
: : : : to deprive other Citizens In Party of rights protected
: : : : per 42 USC 1985, thus causing an injury due to such
: : : : deprivation of rights under 42 USC 1983 then the Citizen
: : : : In Party has set his case in stone IF the Complaint
: : : : contains NONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
: : : : 1. adjectives
: : : : 2. adverbs
: : : : 3. assumptions
: : : : 4. conclusions
: : : : 5. presumptions
: : : : 6. pronouns

: : : : Remember the following rules of procedure which are NOT taught
: : : : in law schools:

: : : : 1. No fact may introduced into evidence.
: : : : 2. All facts must be:
: : : : a) Timely
: : : : b) Highly defined

: : :
: : : Thanks for the reply but... I'm still a little
: : : confused: I think my question was worded badly,
: : : what I was trying to ask was in all the Affadavits
: : : of recission, Affadavits of State Citizenship,
: : : etc..., that people are posting/selling on the
: : : internet, the authors of these forms use the
: : : IRC, the USC, and the CFR to bolster and
: : : substantiate rights and claims of status, and to
: : : PROTECT THEMSELVES by these federally created
: : : statutes. Aren't they then "having their cake
: : : and eating it too?" In other words how can one
: : : state that you are free of jurisdiction by the
: : : IRS by using the IRC to bolster that argument.
: : : and how can one use the UCC or CFR to protect
: : : oneselft when you are already probably protected
: : : by the Constitution and Laws that do apply to
: : : you? (side: why wouldn't one have the right to
: : : have cake and eat it too, what a dumb saying,
: : : i'm sorry i used it now.)

: : If you want to use the Constitution, by all means,
: : do so. But it behooves all who would to read and
: : understand the document so as to be able to quote
: : it forward and backward and KNOW what the words
: : mean. For this a copy of Bouvier's Law Dictionary
: : of 1839 and Webster's 1828 Dictionary of the
: : English language would help to enable each to know
: : the meanings of the words used.

: : Comparison between Webster's 1828 and a current
: : dictionary might amaze one at how much the meaning
: : of words has changed. Ditto for comparison between
: : a 1st Edition of Black's Law and the 6th Edition or
: : comparison between Bouvier's 1839 "Entered according
: : to an Act of Congress" and the "copyrighted" 1914
: : edition.

: : Use of the Internal Re-venue Code is resorted to in
: : order to establish the wrongs perpetrated by agents
: : of the I.R.S./B.A.T.F. crowd in order to cowe the
: : people into submission to unconstitutional secret
: : "codes" whose real meanings are known only to a
: : select few and withheld from the rest.

: : Same with the United States Code and Federal Rules
: : of Civil Procedure.

: : You have to establish that your opponents had
: : knowledge of the law and failed to stop the wrong
: : being done which damaged you. Since they swore an
: : oath to protect and support the Constitution, any
: : failure to do so is prima facie evidence of
: : contempt for the constitution, constructive treason
: : and perjury of oath under 18 U.S.C. 1621.

: : I am involved in litigation in a county court. The
: : prosecutor used My spelling of name and location to
: : send me an envelope containing paper addressed to a
: : fictitious "person" whose name can be spelled in
: : all capital letters. Since I had already denounced
: : such spelling of My Christian appellation absent
: : an instrument with My bona fide signature which
: : established My subjugation to statutory enactments,
: : the prosecutor's mailing of such a document is
: : prima facie proof of malfeasance and violation of
: : 18 U.S.C. 1342, Mail Fraud. And prosecutor
: : prattles on about court cases establishing the duty
: : of "persons" (i.e. those failing to demurr the use
: : of their names in all capital letters) to obey the
: : statutes enacted by their peer "persons" who are
: : U.S. citizens "residing" in the states.

: : First know who you are and then learn how to defend
: : your status and put the burden of proof on your
: : opponents.

: : If you're not having fun, you're not doing it
: : right!
: By jove, I think you've got it maitee (mate)! The rest of youse guys, listen to this one, he's been doing his homework!

A complete understanding of appelations and their effects
plus a very advanced approach to action remedies using
Christian Non-statutory Abatements, sheck out the
voluminous work of The King's Men and The California
Jural Society. You can find them on the web using a
search engine.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]