The Credential Investigation is motivating DEFAMATION

Re: The Credential Investigation is motivating DEFAMATION

Greetings,

This is a brief message directed at anyone who has been exposed to the deliberate LIE that I was somehow “not competent” [sic] to stand trial in the case of USA v. Hill et al.

The following APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS is a good place to start, because it documents in some detail the vicious bias exhibited by a Federal “robe” at the U.S. District Court in Cheyenne, Wyoming, during a preliminary hearing in the “criminal” case:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/disqualifications/application.for.disqualifications.htm

Her “apology” during an open Court hearing was noteworthy.

Nevertheless, that case went quickly downhill anyway, after I was transported back to the Federal Detention Center at SeaTac.

Upon arrival there a second time, I was verbally threatened with solitary confinement if I did not consent to a second “psychological interview” with a full-time BOP psychologist.

Dr. Cynthia Low later turned up withOUT credentials, as did all other BOP personnel, after I requested their APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS with proper FOIA Requests; all of those Requests are now IN DEFAULT:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil2/

I was finally released after filing two (2) civil lawsuits on my own behalf at the Federal District Court in Missouri:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/

And, I seriously doubt that any capable specialist would still question my sanity after reading all of the other pleadings which I authored on my own behalf in that “criminal” case:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/criminal/

There is no question that it was “The Credential Investigation” all along that motivated all of the defamation and criminal retaliations documented in detail above e.g.:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vcc.matrix.htm

And, it is indeed “delusional” in the extreme for anyone to harbor the expectation that the evidence already provided by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) will somehow disappear -- by falsely accusing me of lacking competence. The following is a subset of DOJ’s many written admissions:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/

Shame on all of these suspects. Shame! Shame!! Shame!!!

Further reading:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/credential.investigation.facts.and.laws.htm

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

(cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)