Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris

c/o Forwarding Agent at:

350 – 30^th Street, Suite 444

Oakland 94609-3426

CALIFORNIA, USA

In Propria Persona

without Prejudice

District Court of the United States

Eastern Judicial District of California

Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) No. CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS

)

Plaintiff, ) AUTHOR’S FOURTH NOTICE AND DEMAND

) FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE

v. )

)

AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al., )

)

Defendants. )

______________________________)

COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff in the above entitled case, Citizen of California, Private Attorney General and Federal Witness, to incorporate Attachment “A” by reference as if set forth fully herein, to demand mandatory judicial notice of same, and to provide formal notice to all interested parties of same.

Attachment “A” includes the following three (3) documents:

(1) Partial Invoice to Lonnie G. Schmidt,

dated November 10, 2001 A.D.

(2) FIFTH SUPPLEMENT TO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

AND COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT

(previously filed in the instant case)

(3) AUTHOR’S FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO COMPLAINT

AGAINST DEFENDANT CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY

(previously filed in the instant case)

Attachments A(1) and A(2) are particularly relevant because they provide evidence of continuing economic retaliation against Plaintiff and probable obstruction of justice. Such retaliation violates 18 U.S.C. 1512 and/or 1513 (see COUNTS THREE and FOUR in the Initial COMPLAINT).

Occurring as it did while Plaintiff was attempting to stay current with the pleading requirements of the instant case, that economic retaliation has caused additional consequential damages for which Plaintiff deserves to be compensated.

Attachment A(3) is particularly relevant, and essential, because it explains a general methodology for locating and formally discovering evidence of complicity by any and all named Defendants, using commonly available search engines to scan the database of electronic evidence presently available from the Supreme Law Library.

Furthermore, Attachment A(3) also explains in relevant detail the all important differences between raw HTML code, and the screen images that standard Internet browsers display, using that HTML code as input.

The material evidence of electronic copyright violations is found, in most cases, in the raw HTML code and not in the corresponding screen images or printed copies of those images.

For example, the screen image (or printed copy) may display the text “click here”, whereas the underlying HTML code will contain the full text of the Internet URL to which that text refers.

The Internet domain suspected of infringing Plaintiff’s exclusive copyrights in the subject book will be a substring of text in that URL, for example “cmu.edu”, “aol.com” or “deoxy.org”.

INCORPORATION OF PLEADINGS

Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference, as if set forth fully herein, the following pleadings as previously filed in the official record of the instant case, and hereby demands mandatory judicial notice of same, to wit:

(1) FIFTH SUPPLEMENT TO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

AND COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT

(2) AUTHOR’S FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO COMPLAINT

AGAINST DEFENDANT CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY

VERIFICATION

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Plaintiff in the above entitled action, hereby verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).

Dated: December 1, 2001 A.D.

Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

___________________________________________

Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s):

AUTHOR’S FOURTH NOTICE AND DEMAND

FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:

Clerk of Court

District Court of the United States

501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200

Sacramento 95814-2322

CALIFORNIA, USA

Courtesy copies to:

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley DeForest & Koscelnik

(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oath)

1001 Marshall Street 3000 Koppers Building

Redwood City 94063 436 Seventh Avenue

CALIFORNIA, USA Pittsburgh 15219

PENNSYLVANIA, USA

Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld LLP Pillsbury Winthrop LLP

(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oaths)

P.O. Box 1319 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700

Sacramento 95814-1319 Sacramento 95814-4419

CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA

Dated: December 4, 2001 A.D.

Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

__________________________________________________

Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff In Propria Persona

(not “Pro Se” [sic])

Attachment “A(1)”:

Partial Invoice to Lonnie G. Schmidt

November 10, 2001 A.D.

PARTIAL INVOICE

TO: Lonnie G. Schmidt

Constitutional Educational Research Foundation

11357A Pyrites Way, Suite 3

Gold River 95670

CALIFORNIA, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General

c/o Forwarding Agent

350 – 30^th Street, Suite 444

Oakland 94609-3426

CALIFORNIA, USA

DATE: November 10, 2001 A.D.

SUBJECT: unpaid professional services and

damages from breach of contracts

This is My PARTIAL INVOICE for unpaid professional services performed and accepted, and for damages sustained from breach of contracts, itemized as follows:

Qty Description Total

--- ----------- -----

Debits:

170 hrs. Professional Counsel as Private Attorney General

and litigation between July 7 and November 6,

2001 A.D. on behalf of clients in:

Arizona v. Cook, Arizona Supreme Court

USA v. Vazrik Makarian, Ninth Circuit

USA v. Ramona Holcombe, Fourth Circuit

Warfield v. Edwards et al., Fifth Circuit

USA et al. v. Microsoft, USDC, D.C.

@ $150.00 per hour