Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
c/o Forwarding Agent at:
350 – 30th Street,
Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
In Propria Persona
All Rights Reserved
without Prejudice
District Court of the United States
Eastern Judicial District of California
Paul Andrew
Mitchell, ) No. CIV.
S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS
)
Plaintiff,
) FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO
) NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
v. ) CERTIFICATE
OF NECESSITY:
)
AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al., )
28 U.S.C. 1746(1)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff in the
above entitled case, Citizen of California, Private Attorney General and
Federal Witness, to file and
serve this, His FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR CERTIFICATE OF
NECESSITY.
Plaintiff
is presently faced with the need to reproduce, file and serve documents with so
many pages, the costs of reproduction and mailing are creating a prohibitive
financial burden.
Lex
non cogit impossibilia. (The law cannot compel the doing of
impossibilities.)
However, all of the pertinent documents are presently available
from the Supreme Law Library on the Internet.
Plaintiff hereby requests all interested parties to obtain these
documents from the Internet, in order to ensure uniformity and to expedite
their availability at minimal cost to all concerned.
If any interested party insists
on obtaining a hard copy from Plaintiff, that party need only make a written
request for same to Plaintiff and He will do everything possible to expedite
the delivery of the requested hard-copy via U.S. Mail.
The documents in question are listed in the following Tables of
Contents in the Supreme Law Library, by Internet
URL:
USA v. Microsoft, USDC, District of Columbia
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/index.htm
USA v. Makarian, Ninth Circuit
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/makarian/index.htm
Warfield v. Edwards, Fifth Circuit
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/edwards/index.htm
USA v. Holcome, Fourth Circuit
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/holcombe/index.htm
USA v. Gilbertson, Eighth Circuit
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-e
Occurrences of “DCUS” in Title 28, United States Code
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/dcus.in.28usc.bold.htm
Occurrences of “USDC” in Title 28, United States Code
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/usdc.in.28usc.bold.htm
USA v. Wallen, USDC, Tucson, Arizona
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/wallens/nadjudge.htm
(docketed by ORDER of Judge Alex Kozinski)
For uniformity of results, Plaintiff recommends Microsoft Internet Explorer, File | Page Setup | Margins of:
Left: 1.60 inches
Right: 0.40 inches
Top: 0.75 inches
Bottom: 0.75 inches
Plaintiff attaches a true and correct copy of His TRANSMITTAL LETTER to Judge Alex Kozinski, dated December 18, 2001 A.D., and incorporates same as Attachment “A” by reference, as if set forth fully here.
Plaintiff hereby also incorporates by reference all documents listed in the Tables of Contents itemized above, as if set forth fully herein. (See offer supra to print and mail hard copies.)
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Plaintiff in the
above entitled action, hereby verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws
of the United States of America, without the “United States”
(federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and
correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and
belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: January 14,
2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul
Andrew Mitchell
___________________________________________
Printed: Paul
Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under
penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America,
without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18
years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF
the United States of America, and that I personally served the following
document(s):
FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO NOTICE AND DEMAND
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in
first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to
the following:
Clerk of Court (2
copies)
District Court of the United States
501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento 95814-2322
CALIFORNIA, USA
Courtesy copies to:
Judge Alex Kozinski
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 91510
Pasadena 91109-1510
CALIFORNIA, USA
Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley DeForest & Koscelnik
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oath)
1001 Marshall Street 3000 Koppers Building
Redwood City 94063 436 Seventh Avenue
CALIFORNIA, USA Pittsburgh 15219
PENNSYLVANIA, USA
Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld LLP Pillsbury Winthrop LLP
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oaths)
P.O. Box 1319 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento 95814-1319 Sacramento 95814-4419
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart Oliver
Kraemer & Sloan, LLP & Hedges, LLP
(oaths requested) (oaths requested)
727 Sansome Street 201 Sansome Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco 94111 San Francisco 94104
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Dated: January 15,
2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul
Andrew Mitchell
__________________________________________________
Printed: Paul
Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff In Propria Persona
(not
“Pro Se” [sic])
Transmittal Letter to Judge Alex
Kozinski
United States Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit
December 18, 2001 A.D.
TO: Hon. Alex Kozinski, Judge
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 91510
Pasadena 91109-1510
CALIFORNIA, USA
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
#CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS, DCUS Sacramento
DATE: December 18, 2001 A.D.
SUBJECT: Petition for Certificate of Necessity
Greetings Judge Kozinski,
Under separate cover, I have already mailed to you one (1) copy of My petition for a certificate of necessity, to assign an Article III federal judge to My civil case against AOL Time Warner, Inc. and 128 other named defendants (see enclosed).
You may recall that you ordered a similar petition docketed in the case of USA v. Sheila Wallen, Tucson, Arizona, several years ago.
My printing load has been so heavy, and my cashflow has been so severely strained in recent weeks, today is the first day I have been able to complete the task of providing your office with seven (7) more copies of My petition and of the Initial COMPLAINT in the above entitled case.
Please be advised that the Initial COMPLAINT, SUPPLEMENTS, and EXHIBITS are all available in electronic form at Internet URL:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/index.htm
I am also enclosing personal copies for you of certain related pleadings which I have authored on the issue of Article III district courts. In Gilbertson’s OPENING BRIEF, this issue is discussed at Topic “E”. These pleadings are also available at supremelaw.org/cc.
As soon as I can afford to do so, I will print seven (7) more copies of each and incorporate these pleadings properly for the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Kozinski, in closing I would like to take this opportunity to wish you a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year.
Thank you, again, for your professional consideration.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff
enclosures: pleadings in following cases
(seven (7) copies to follow):
USA v. Microsoft, USDC, District of Columbia
USA v. Makarian, Ninth Circuit
Warfield v. Edwards, Fifth Circuit
USA v. Holcome, Fourth Circuit
USA v. Gilbertson, Eighth Circuit
Occurrences of “DCUS” in Title 28, U.S.C.
Occurrences of “USDC” in Title 28, U.S.C.
copy: Clerk of Court, DCUS Sacramento (2x)