EMAIL NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPLY FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Subject: Private Attorney General notifies Florida AG of intent to intervene

in Pensacola suit against Obamacare on behalf of the People of the USA

Cc: SupremeLaw <supremelaw@googlegroups.com>, dboardman@seattletimes.com, opinion@seattletimes.com, business@seattletimes.com

Re: Private Attorney General notifies Florida Attorney General

of intent to apply for intervention in Pensacola lawsuit against Obamacare

on behalf of the People of the USA

TO:

Hon. Bill McCollum

Attorney General

STATE OF FLORIDA

The Capitol, Suite PL-01

Tallahassee 32399-1050

FLORIDA, USA

SUBJECT: Florida et al. v. U.S., USDC/NDFL/Pensacola

No. 3:10-CV-00091-RV-EMT

Greetings Attorney General McCollum:

This is our informal Notice of Intent to petition for leave to intervene in the above entitled case on behalf of the People of the United States of America ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General. See 18 U.S.C. 1964(a).

The People are particularly concerned about the existence of hidden agendas, one of which clearly concerns the looming impact of the "Baby Boom" upon the solvency of the Social Security system. On this point, please see our Parametric Analysis, and the question-and-answer discussion that followed its publication and distribution in the District of Columbia and elsewhere:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ss/baby.boom.benefits.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ss/baby.boom.discussion.htm

The People now suspect that socialized medicine is a ruse to increase the death rate, rather than to maintain the solvency of the Social Security system during the coming 16 years, when the entire Baby Boom is predicted to retire.

Your office can easily project the financial impact of reducing average life expectancy below 75 years of age, using the same or similar "parametric" techniques.

The People also regard as now ripe for litigation the chronic issues that surround the use of "noms de guerre" in all similar civil, and criminal, litigation.

Put bluntly, if the "United States" (Federal government) has been in an undeclared, secret state of war against the Citizens of the 50 States of the Union, as strongly suggested by its chronic and stubborn resort to improper names for service of process, i.e. spelled in ALL CAPS, then the People wish to raise the possibility that treason is, in fact, now happening against them; and, they will need to take immediate steps to defend themselves. In this context, please see our Executive Summary to the U.S. Coast Guard concerning more evidence of treason:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/inside.job.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/executive.summary.htm

More plainly, there is a growing body of evidence that the STATE OF FLORIDA is, in fact, a de facto political subdivision of the District of Columbia, stemming chiefly from the secret bankruptcy of the "United States" which was begun during FDR's first term in office. In this context, please be aware that the United States has now formally declared its insolvency with respect to obligations allegedly owed to the Federal Reserve Banks. I am the Principal on that DECLARATION:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/insolvency.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/insolvency.explained.htm

And, it is not presently well known that Congress expressly extended the entire U.S. Constitution into D.C. in 1871:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm#1871

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/16/16stat426.gif

In light of the latter facts and Laws, the People believe they have an immediate need to apply for intervention, chiefly because they are not properly represented by a de facto corporate STATE OF FLORIDA or by any other de facto political subdivision of the District of Columbia. For further substantiation, please see the former Federal Regulations at 31 CFR 51.2 and 52.2:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/31cfr512.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/31cfr522.htm

Those former Regulations were cited in this winning Brief, which my office authored:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/jetruman/oppososc.htm

(names were changed to protect family privacy)

[begin quote] 3. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for Title 31, U.S.C., exhibits two (2) separate treasuries, see 31 CFR 51.2 and 52.2. Specifically, compare definitions of "Governor" at 31 CFR 51.2(i) and 52.2(f), of "Secretary" at 51.2(o) and 52.2(n), and of "State government" at 51.2(q) and 52.2(o). [end quote]

Thank, Attorney General, for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm