TRANSMITTAL LETTER

 

 

TO:       Hon. Alex Kozinski, Judge

          Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

          P.O. Box 91510

          Pasadena 91109-1510

          CALIFORNIA, USA

 

FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff

          Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.

          #CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS, DCUS Sacramento

 

DATE:     December 18, 2001 A.D.

 

SUBJECT:  Petition for Certificate of Necessity

 

 

Greetings Judge Kozinski,

 

Under separate cover, I have already mailed to you one (1) copy of My petition for a certificate of necessity, to assign an Article III federal judge to My civil case against AOL Time Warner, Inc. and 128 other named defendants (see enclosed).

 

You may recall that you ordered a similar petition docketed in the case of USA v. Sheila Wallen, Tucson, Arizona, several years ago.

 

My printing load has been so heavy, and my cashflow has been so severely strained in recent weeks, today is the first day I have been able to complete the task of providing your office with seven (7) more copies of My petition and of the Initial COMPLAINT in the above entitled case.

 

Please be advised that the Initial COMPLAINT, SUPPLEMENTS, and EXHIBITS are all available in electronic form at Internet URL:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/index.htm

 

I am also enclosing personal copies for you of certain related pleadings which I have authored on the issue of Article III district courts.  In Gilbertson’s OPENING BRIEF, this issue is discussed at Topic “E”.  These pleadings are also available at supremelaw.org/cc.

 

As soon as I can afford to do so, I will print seven (7) more copies of each and incorporate these pleadings properly for the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit.

 

Judge Kozinski, in closing I would like to take this opportunity to wish you a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year.

 

Thank you, again, for your professional consideration.

 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell

Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff

 

enclosures:  pleadings in following cases

            (seven (7) copies to follow):

 

     USA v. Microsoft, USDC, District of Columbia

     USA v. Makarian, Ninth Circuit

     Warfield v. Edwards, Fifth Circuit

     USA v. Holcome, Fourth Circuit

     USA v. Gilbertson, Eighth Circuit

     Occurrences of “DCUS” in Title 28, U.S.C.

     Occurrences of “USDC” in Title 28, U.S.C.

 

copy:  Clerk of Court, DCUS Sacramento (2x)