Re: Deeds REPONSE


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Two Cities on August 26, 1997 at 13:09:52:

In Reply to: Re: Deeds REPONSE posted by Anne on August 23, 1997 at 10:53:07:

:
: Hope nobody minds my deleting the original question for expediency:
: 1) If you provide your e-mail address, I'll e-mail
: you directly with the name of a fella out west
: that deals with this type of info..he's super
: busy but knows about all the de factor vs de jure
: instruments dealing with "property."I hesitate
: to put his phone number/address out on inet w/o
: his permission, etc.

: Also: Surely some of these groups that deal
: with allodials/land patents and such would probably
: know. Search on these topics and some of these
: groups are bound to come up.

: Ann

The search was informative. Thanks.
Municipalities are perhaps raising the land patent
issues at time of incorporation, and at all times
subsequent in the event of annexations, thereby
establishing their PARAMOUNT interest in the land
under their "jurisdiction".Any additional pointers
are always welcome. A YES vote in an annexation
election, is perhaps akin to a feudal oath of fealty.
Does anyone know.

Property transfers that do not transfer the interest in
the land patent, such as warranty deeds, deeds of trust or
other instruments may only transfer the illusion of
color of title, keeping the patent holder as the
true owner, and entitled to his fief.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]