ACTUAL NOTICE OF PROBABLE FRAUD

 

TO:       Hon. Steven T. Mnuchin

          Secretary of the Treasury

          Department of the Treasury

          1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

          Washington 20220

          District of Columbia, USA

 

COPY:     David J. Kautter

          Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue

          1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

          Washington 20224-0002

          District of Columbia, USA

 

FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;

          Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;  and,

          Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

          Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

 

DATE:     January 18, 2018 A.D.

 

SUBJECT:  IRS Form 211, Application for Award for Original

          Information, Claim Number(s) 2018-003207

 

Greetings Secretary Mnuchin and Commissioner:

 

The attached letter dated 1/2/2018 from Mr. Joseph Hebb is hereby refused for reasons including but not limited to probable fraud.

 

To simplify some of the many reasons for this ACTUAL NOTICE, permit me to “take it from the top”:

 

(1)     names in ALL CAPS are “noms de guerrei.e. names of war, or war names, in the French language, and warring upon the several States of the Union is defined as treason at 18 U.S.C. 2381;

 

(2)     the information provided in support of my Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information, should result at a minimum in collection of penalties and interest e.g. see criminal penalties for perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621, and for impersonating an officer of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912;

 

(3)     the information provided was not “speculative” because it included correspondence on U.S. Government letterhead received from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in response to a proper FOIA Request for the specific credentials required by law of Lois G. Lerner when she was initially hired by DOJ;

 

(4)     the information provided was specific and credible information regarding violations of the internal revenue laws, chiefly section 6065 of the Internal Revenue Code, as expressly cited in Paragraph 10 of said Form 211 (cf. “Other (identify)”);


(5)     Mr. Layne Carver has failed and/or refused to disclose valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS, even after being shown proof that he signed a COUNTERFEIT Standard Form 61;  and, further, Mr. Carver stubbornly refuses to disclose a valid Standard Form 61;

 

(6)     Mr. Joseph Hebb appears to be retaliating against me for having lodged Form 211, and for having provided specific and credible information regarding violations of the internal revenue laws:  ignorance of those laws is no excuse for violating those laws;

 

(7)     Mr. Joseph Hebb either knew or should have known that willful violations of IRC section 6065 constitute probable cause that perjury was committed, and that violations of 5 U.S.C. 5507 barred Lois G. Lerner from being paid any salaries for the first two (2) years of her employment with DOJ’s Criminal Division;  and,

 

(8)     Mr. Joseph Hebb also manifests gross ignorance and negligence regarding the legal obligations imposed by the Federal criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 4 (Misprision of felony):  said Form 211 was submitted in good faith and full satisfaction of those same legal obligations, which arose because impersonation and perjury are felony violations of 18 U.S.C. 912 and 1621, respectively.

 

Accordingly, on the basis of reasons including but not limited to those enumerated above, and on the bases of evidence provided in all attached documents, Mr. Joseph Hebb’s letter dated 1/2/2018 is hereby refused for fraud and probable mail fraud, and returned to you.

 

In conclusion, all evidence made available to me as of March 1990 gives me no option now but to regard the Internal Revenue Service as a criminal enterprise routinely engaged in a pattern of racketeering activities, and to act accordingly.

 

Kindly, therefore, also accept this ACTUAL NOTICE as my formal notice of intent formally to charge Lois Gail Lerner with perjury, racketeering and impersonation in connection with all missing credentials during her first two years of employment at DOJ, and also in connection with “The IRS Targeting Scandal” [sic] and my false arrest and unlawful incarceration instigated by that Scandal.

 

Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter.

 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;  and,

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

 

All Rights Reserved

(cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

 

Attachments


http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2018-01-02/page01.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2018-01-02/page01.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-21/clarification.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-21/usps.sales.receipt.2017-12-22.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-19/page01.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-19/page01.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-19/page02.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-19/exhibits.htm

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-14/page01.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-14/page01.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-14/page02.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-14/exhibits.htm

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-11/page01.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-11/page01.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-11/exhibits.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-11/affidavit.carver.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2017-12-11/affidavit.carver.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/letter.2016-04-21/page01.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/norcal/letter.2017-11-22/page01.refused.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/norcal/letter.2017-11-22/page01.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/Form.211.2017-11-04.pdf

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/exhibits.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/certificate.of.mailing.2017-11-06.1.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/certificate.of.mailing.2017-11-06.2.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/usps.sales.receipt.2017-11-06.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/award.application/p5251.pdf

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-10-31/page01.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-10-31/page02.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/norcal/notice.of.intent.htm

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-05-08/page01.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-05-02/page01.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/foia.appeal.2.lerner.htm

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-03-30/page01.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-03-30/page02.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/refusal.for.fraud.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/usps.sales.receipt.2017-02-22.GIF

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/page01.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/page02.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/page03.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/usps.tracking.9505516498367013004648.htm

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/certificate.of.mailing.2017-01-11.1.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/certificate.of.mailing.2017-01-11.2.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/usps.sales.receipt.2017-01-11.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-12-08/page01.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/foia.request.2.lerner.htm

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-11-09/page01.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-11-09/appointment.gif

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-11-09/affidavit.gif

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/foia.request.lerner.htm

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/reservation.of.right.to.inspect.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/certificate.of.mailing.2016-10-11.2.GIF

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/certificate.of.mailing.2016-10-11.gif