Seminar Outline
by
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law, Federal Witness
and Private Attorney General
All Rights Reserved
without Prejudice
Introduction
· 12 years of court activism completed
· Classic book cited by U.S. Supreme Court
· Nationwide research explosion spawned
· Supreme Law Library created and maintained
· “The Road to Tucson” and other miracles
· Cracking Title 28, United States Code
Case Highlights
USA v. Vroman (1991)
People v. Boxer (1992)
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
Hawks v. County of Butte (1995)
Arizona v. Taylor (1996)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (1996)
USA v. Wallen (1996)
People v. United States (1996)
Swan v. Ulan (1997)
USA v. Pixley (1997)
Kleinpaste v. United States et al.
USA v. Gilbertson (1997)
“The Lawless Rehnquist” (1997)
Mitchell v. Nordbrock (1997)
Mitchell v. City of San Marcos et al. (1998)
USA v. Wishart (2000)
George W. Bush v. Palm Beach Canvassing Board (2000)
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner et al. (2001)
Letter to President Bush, in re: Saving Social Security
USA v. Microsoft Corporation (2001)
USA v. Makarian (2001)
Meredith et al. v. Erath et al. (2002)
People ex rel. Bybee v. Erath et al. (2002)
USA v. Vroman (1991)
First client: a former California State judge
Defeated felony tax evasion charges
Exposed no IRS central/field organization, Federal Register
Exposed missing filing requirement, via demurrer
People v. Boxer (1992)
Defeated 16th amendment in California Supreme Court
Boxer’s silence activated estoppel, evidence of fraud
Documented equitable nature of Oaths of Office
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
Justice Anthony Kennedy uses “federal zone”
as a household word in concurring opinion
major re-evaluation of Commerce Clause
Hawks v. County of Butte (1995)
First U.S. Supreme Court case
Challenged doctrine of judicial immunity
Learned about Internet and email lists
First exposure to Human Rights Treaties
Discovered Internet copyright infringement
Arizona v. Taylor (1996)
Child kidnap racket investigated: 2,500 missing children
Links to Belgium and “The Franklin Coverup,” Nebraska
Tucson Int’l Airport and Red China implicated
Black market in America for live human organs
20/20 television coverage, other evidence
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (1996)
Appointed Vice President for Legal Affairs
Court granted leave to represent Trust
Routed IRS agent, 2 DOJ attorneys
Major research progress on several fronts, e.g. FOIA
Admitted evidence of “The Kick-Back Racket” in IRM
First procedural challenge to Jury Selection Act
Judge admitted obstructing correspondence to grand jury
Judge’s ORDER leaks admission of 2nd district court
Complaint of felony federal offenses against 2 judges
Supreme Law Library started, e.g. Citizen’s Guide to FOIA/PA
USA v. Wallen (1996)
2nd challenge to Jury Selection and Service Act
FOIA forced question of federal criminal jurisdiction
Discovered 2 classes of federal district courts
Removal procedure and Petition for Warrant of Removal
Selected supervisory judge on 9th Circuit, 18 U.S.C. 4
Judge ordered removal procedure docketed at 9th Circuit
12 threats against my life (in my living room)
People v. United States (1996)
Private Attorney General on behalf of People of USA
Moral “high ground” for Schweitzer cases, Montana
Major test of DCUS v. USDC thesis, S.Ct. case law
Conceived DOJ racketeering theory, 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.
Retaliation escalates
Swan v. Ulan (1997)
DOJ racketeering confirmed in AFFIDAVIT
Formal Offer to Prove Racketeering (RICO)
Fifth Amendment violation in Schweitzer methodology
More retaliation
USA v. Pixley (1997)
Client imprisoned for importing cancer cure from Canada
Court issued Gag order in re: compound 714X
Confirmed lack of regs for federal Jury Selection Act
Invoked administrative procedure to promulgate reg’s
Medical conspiracy confirmed (“Every Body Needs Milk”)
Kleinpaste v. United States et al.
Discovered DOJ’s missing Power of Attorney
Perfected pleadings to force the question
Confirmed that client was infringing book copyright
USA v. Gilbertson (1997)
3nd challenge to Jury Selection and Service Act
OPENING BRIEF to 8th Circuit: 50-page “masterpiece”
7 major points fully developed (itemize)
Only one typographical mistake found (to date)
Loophole confirmed in the Guarantee Clause
Obstruction/extortion by jailers and agents unknown
People’s Application for Intervention of Right
Recent 8th Circuit ruling overturns UNPUBLISHED rule
Mandamus to compel ruling on People’s intervention
Constitution binds D.C. and all federal Territories!!!
“The Lawless Rehnquist” (1997)
2 MAJOR mistakes by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist
· no provision to declare Acts of Congress unconstitutional
(see Marbury v. Madison)
· federal judges should be punished for tax evasion
(in re: impeachment trial of Samuel Chase in 1801)
Major admission: all federal judges now pay taxes on pay
Focus on specious Downes Doctrine from Downes v. Bidwell
Mitchell v. Nordbrock (1997)
Won jury verdict against embezzler accountant & wife
Losing attorney stopped payment on check ($3,000+)
Bank fraud/mail fraud complaint against losing attorney
Retaliation escalates
Mitchell v. City of San Marcos et al. (1998)
Retaliation escalates further
Denied phone, electricity & arrested for no SSN
Assaulted by 4-time felon, hospitalized in ER at CTMC
Exposed Social Security as municipal law
Formally argued Human Rights Treaties, State jurisdiction
Commenced systematic copyright enforcement at SWT
USA v. Wishart (2000)
Federal U.C.C. is municipal law (December 1963, JFK legend)
Accommodation provisions may violate 5th Amendment
First COMPLAINT severs DOJ power of attorney for IRS
· 5 U.S.C. 551 excludes “governments of the territories”
IRS domicile in Puerto Rico is further confirmed
First Circuit reveals 2nd Secretary of the Treasury:
· Used
Tire Int’l, Inc. v. Manual Diaz-Saldana
U.S. Supreme Court confirms no organic Act for IRS!
· Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, footnote 23
Second COMPLAINT sought:
· to freeze all IRS assets, pending final judgment
· injunction to force deposits into Treasury of the U.S.
· conspiracy to engage in pattern of racketeering activity
More retaliation: no pay, lost housing, theft of belongings
George W. Bush v. Palm Beach Canvassing Board (November 2000)
Political move against V.P. Albert Gore
Clarified 2 classes of citizens and related fraud:
· Citizen of the United States = State Citizen
· citizen of the United States = federal citizen
Federal citizenship is a “municipal franchise”
· domiciled in the District of Columbia since 1866
· Congress keeps profits from exercising the “franchise”
Dispositive cases discovered and cited:
Pannill v. Roanoke, Murphy v. Ramsey, many others
Federal citizens were not even contemplated when
organic U.S. Constitution was first ratified
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner et al. (2001)
“The Federal Zone” shareware stolen and modified
88+ months of copyright violations on Internet
6 million copies estimated @ $25.00, actual damages
88+ months of Lanham Act Violations, triple damages
200+ Internet domains implicated, AOL the kingpin
20 major universities implicated (CalTech, Stanford, UCI)
COMPLAINT sits atop 400 MB integrated hypertext database
Civil RICO COUNT SIX being researched/considered
Saving Social Security
letter to President George W. Bush
collection of Social Security evidence
important test of Article III
successful test of Article III
Meredith et al. v. Erath et al. and Cross-Appeal
intervention by the United States ex rel. Paul Mitchell
MOTIONS for preliminary injunction and to freeze IRS assets
People ex rel. Bybee et al. v. Erath et al.
APPLICATION for ORDER Dissolving the IRS
Major Lessons:
There are 2 Classes of Citizens
· Citizens of the United States, aka State Citizens
· citizens of the United States, aka federal citizens
· those qualified to make federal Laws are not eligible
to vote or serve on any juries, State or federal
· those eligible to vote and serve on State & federal juries
are not qualified to make any federal Laws
· separate and unequal treatment violates Guarantee Clause
and Principle of Equal Protection
· second Privileges and Immunities Clause in so-called
14th amendment is undeniable confirmation of 2 classes
The term “United States” has 3 legal meanings:
· confirmed by Supreme Court in Hooven & Allison v. Evatt
· correctly cited in Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition
· definition removed in Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition!
· 2nd meaning is the municipal jurisdiction of Congress
Fourteenth and Sixteenth “amendments” were never ratified
· Oaths of Office implicate exact provisions in Constitution
· People v. Boxer, Dyett v. Turner etc. can be cited
· validity of public debt CAN be questioned
· “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” means
“subject to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress”
U.S. Constitution binds D.C. and U.S. Territories
· expressly extended by Acts of Congress in 1871 and 1873
· Downes Doctrine is specious (see “The Federal Zone”)
· federal citizenship is a municipal franchise
· 2 classes violate Principle of Equal Protection
· 6th Amendment binds federal municipal law too
IRS must be
dismantled and IRC repealed
in toto
· Date Certain Tax Code Replacement Act, 4/13/2000:
· Code is “overly complex” --> void for vagueness
· Code cannot be justly administered or enforced
· Grace Commission under Reagan leaked MAJOR ADMISSION:
Federal income taxes are not paying for any federal
government services!!!
FOIA is a most powerful tool
· start with Freedom, the first letter in “FOIA”
· request and appeal letters are the only requisites
· administrative remedies are exhausted in 30 working days
· DCUS is the federal court of original jurisdiction:
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B), 18 U.S.C. 3231, many others
· typical use is a request for all statutes which create
a specific liability for taxes imposed
by IRC subtitle A
· relevance and materiality need not be demonstrated
· typical MOTION is for stay of proceedings,
pending formal discovery under FOIA
Article III DCUS needs to be restored fully
· Treaties guarantee courts of competent jurisdiction
and qualified judicial officers
· Statutes granting original jurisdiction must be
strictly construed, per 9th Amendment
· Supremacy Clause mirrors 3:2:1 and 28 U.S.C. 1331
· Ex post facto bar prevents re-definitions before 1948
· Sherman Anti-Trust Act and Microsoft case
Codes Re-defining “State”, “United States” unconstitutional
· Eisner v. Macomber prohibits Congress from re-defining
any term found in the U.S. Constitution
· terms “State” and “United States” figure prominently
· Guarantee Clause should become major litigation focus
The Future:
Finish Mandamus for People to intervene in Gilbertson:
· IRC is unconstitutional for violating Sixth Amendment
· Jury Selection and Service Act is unconstitutional
for exhibiting discrimination against State Citizens
· voter registration affidavits are likewise fraudulent
· Convene 3-judge DCUS panel to hear all major questions
Pursue Major Life Goals:
· Dismantle IRS, repeal IRC and income taxes
· Litigate Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner et al.
· Campaign for seat in U.S. House of Representatives
· Found and build the Supreme Law College, California
· Produce & distribute 3-part film of “The Federal Zone”
· Establish humanitarian trusts
e.g. indigent “EyeCare” fund, The Building Trust,
Cooler Building Concepts, favorite charities